Reintroducing "God" inside the schools...interesting. How? And why?

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!

I stumbled upon this in many english speaking forums. Americans, that talk about how God is not in the schools anymore, how prayer was taken out of schools, and how this nation was a nation under God, and more important that many social problems that America faces today are because God is supposedly "forbidden" in public schools.

 

I mean, God, being an entity that we cannot sense with out 5 basic senses, was supposedly taken out of schools, supposedly leaving the children with no morals, no ethics.

I think by taking out of school, they mean that secularity has taken effect within the public school walls, since public schools are a place of study for children from many other faiths, such as hindus, muslims, sikhs, jews or wikkenz.

Is it true that once, prayer was obligatory in schools, since they always brag about how prayer was taken out of schools? They didnt say that it was obligatory by their own words, but I just figured, hey if it was taken out once, it must have been some sort of an obligation...

What do you think? How was God "banished" from the public schools? How was prayer banished in the same manner? If they did, was it the right choice to do(imo, it was since secularity demands that the goverment is seperate from a specific religion)? 

< Framing The Debate | Republicans think Dems can not win without Jewish Vote >
 Display:
Sincere or sarcasm? Either is fine by me, I'm just curious.

by MedfordTim on 05/17/2008 04:02:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]
that link was concise .. well researched.. well documented and cant be argued with easily.

I really do love links like that .

I usually save the scarasm for conservatives.
since most of the links they provide are hog poop that have no basis in reality of fact and if they do . Somewhere in the link the article attacks thier own position.

by Chinese Democracy on 05/17/2008 08:28:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I have heard the phrase "you're not making sense" a lot lately, and I tend to worry because what I put forth always seems to make sense to me.

Come to think of it, isn't that a quote from Caligula? Or was it Dennis Miller?

by MedfordTim on 05/17/2008 08:46:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Here in Ontario, the government publicly funds the Catholic school board. I went to Catholic school all throughout elementary and high school. I will be honest, if I had to choose to send my child (which I do not have) to a secular public school or a Catholic school, I would choose the Catholic school. There is a perception, whether right or wrong that they offer better education and are safer. Its very much a psychological thing. 


I prayed three times a day, in the morning after the national anthem, lunch, and the end of class (in high school it was mostly only in the morning). As you can tell, that affected me little in my political views. Frankly, it is my Christianity that made me more left than not; the reason is that I do not think prayer alone is enough to change people's opinions. It all depends on how religion is taught to the students, I had a "faith-based" sexual education in the sense that the book we read said God, but the information from what I can remember was accurate, albeit tame. It was normative, no homosexuality was officially discussed, but tolerance was. 


The school's were rife with drugs, sex, etc. So going to a "Catholic" or Christian school, and praying does absolutely nothing in terms of social mores for the majority of the students. What I can say is that at least from my perceptions, violence was rare. So in my opinion, its not prayer thats the issue necessarily, of course it should not be enforced in a secular public school, but how  religion is taught to the students. 

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 05/17/2008 12:56:35 PM EST

To hold prayer sessions or whatever, but I'm talking about public schools, because that is the place where prayer and the Bible were taken out.

You may say that a Catholic school prefers a more strict type of education, valuing chasity and being a good person and such, and have generally less violence than most other public schools in America(I think it also depends on where you live in america)but it is not a "secular" type of school, though I dont think that in America catholic schools are much of a problem.

Well, if the education is OK, and if you want your child to be raised catholic, you may send your children there. But, I was actually talking about the Protestant christians, since they are the ones(mostly) that want the Bible reintroduced into school classes.

If I am generalizing too much forgive and correct me, but it has something to do with the convservative Baptist society in America I guess. 

by azmhyr on 05/17/2008 01:14:48 PM EST

is something that the christofacists want and so far have not got . I hope they never do.

If your kid wants to pray.. who is stopping them?
If your kid wants to read the bible .. who is stopping them?

If your kid wants the school itself to lead the prayer.. then they can find a religious school of their liking and go there.

by Chinese Democracy on 05/17/2008 01:33:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Catholic schools here are public, they are funded as much as public secular schools.

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 05/17/2008 02:06:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]
a sect of the Christian religion has become state sponsored religion. The minute the state starts paying for a religion. Well you get the drift.

Are buddhist, muslim. taoist hindu native american religions sponsored to? Or just certain christian ones.

by Chinese Democracy on 05/17/2008 08:31:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]
But I disagree with your conclusion, the state may pay for the education but I the rest of the logic is not there. Canada is not a theocracy, especially not a Catholic theocracy. The US has more in common with the Catholic Church's dogma than we do. The other schools I believe are not funded, or if they are, they are funded at much lower levels. Only Catholics get the equal funding that secular school do. 

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 05/18/2008 02:43:20 AM EST

[ Parent ]
a certain religion... its state sponsored religion.. theocracy or not.. right?

by Chinese Democracy on 05/18/2008 03:37:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]

The idea of "state sponsorship" means, to me at least, the state actively propagating the religion. The Canadian state does not propagate Catholicism as the state's religion, but it does support the funding of the Catholic school board (at least in Ontario), which begs the question, is that state sponsorship? To me, at least, the idea of state sponsorship is more akin to Iran or Saudi Arabia than Canada. I do not personally believe that merely funding the school board means that the state sponsors the religion, especially considering that the Catholic school board is still forced to teach secular issues like evolution (which we learned). The only substantive difference is that we prayed, had class on Christianity and eventually "world religions", we were taught sex education with a more religious bent, and we had a in-house priest and chapel. Now it all depends on how you define, "state sponsorship" and what values you put into the term. 

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 05/18/2008 04:02:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]
and its one that applies

by Chinese Democracy on 05/19/2008 04:05:17 AM EST

[ Parent ]

You are right, Catholics aren't real big on the Bible.  On of the tenets of the Protestant movement was that the bibile was the highest authority.  Catholic did not, and do not, accept this.  The Church (led by the Pope) is a higher authority.

In fact, I have a lot of school experience and the Catholics (at least here) show no interest in getting God or the church back into schools. 

by ProfRich on 05/18/2008 01:10:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]

"I mean, God, being an entity that we cannot sense with out 5 basic senses, was supposedly taken out of schools, supposedly leaving the children with no morals, no ethics."

Uh-oh.  A scary thought just occured to me:  What if God is Muslim?  God as a suicide bomber?  Think about it. 

by bfaul on 05/17/2008 02:19:56 PM EST

Here in the People's Theocracy of Utah, there is an LDS seminary adjacent to every single public middle school, jr. high, and high school. They are not on school property (wink wink) and the teachers are not school employees (nudge nudge). These are elective courses, of course, but the pressure on kids to attend is intense, and most do, especially in the small towns like where I went to HS. I ain't mo, so I didn't go.

Do other faiths have seminary programs like this in other States?

by Pritch on 05/17/2008 11:31:15 PM EST

You should have stated where you are from.  OBVIOUSLY, we welcome non-Americans here, seeing as Cenk is an IMMIGRANT.

It's really cool that you post around here and ask questions.  You can learn a lot more about America and American Psychology watching The Young Turks than the regular Media that we incessantly bombard the rest of the world with. 

The First Amendment to the Constitution says there shall be no Establishment of Religion in the United States.  Like Britain has the official state-sponsored Church of England, and many Catholic countries give special status to the Catholic Church.  And Islamic coutries which write into their Laws things straight from the Koran.

America was founded by people escaping oppressive religious tyrranny.  Be it Puritans in Massachusetts or the Catholics in Maryland, ostracized from England or the Hugenots, Protestants escaping France.  The Founding Fathers wanted a country where no sect or belief was endorsed by the State, because they had SEEN the consequences of such oppression.

But up until the middle of the 20th Century most Americans has been Christian, with a small but vibrant Jewish community, so most Americans saw no harm in poking a little religion into State functions, especially SCHOOLS because nearly everyone werer Believers, in some shape or form.

Then Atheists and Agnostics started to gain numbers and question WHY functions of the State were injecting Religion into public functions. And the Supreme Court agreed, deciding that even CHEERING for a vague non-Sectarian God had no place in anything having to do with the State.

______

About Ethics without God.

There are many schools of Philosophy about Ethics that do not involve God.  The "Natural Rights" of John Locke, whose work DEEPLY influenced the Founding Fathers.  David Hume's "Social Utility." John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism.  Ayn Rand's Objectivism.

I had a lot of dicussions with my College Roommate, a "wandering" Catholic about Ethics. Me being a devout Agnostic and he still being a Theist. 

He said, "If you don't belive in God, what's to keep you from KILLING ME?"

My response was, "I DON'T WANT to kill you!!!"

The very IDEA of murdering someone is repugnat to my nature.  To do so, even when I HAD to in order to survive would do such IRREPERABLE psychological DAMAGE to myself, the very THOUGHT chills me.

The idea that getting your Ethics from a BOOK or a PASTOR or a DOCTRINE, based upon some questionable, Metaphysical Gobbledygook scares ME, even more. What if the Book or Pastor or Doctrine says, "Kill Me"?

The History of Religion shows how people will use Religion and Doctrine as a justification to commit the most horrible ATTROCITIES.  From the INQUISITION, to the Russian POGRAMS, to the Nazi and Stalinist Ideology that murdered MILLIONS.  The BODY COUNT between Ideologues and Free-Thinkers is like 100,000,000 to ZERO.

by sunsawed on 05/18/2008 02:08:40 AM EST

He said, "If you don't believe in God, what's to keep you from KILLING ME?"

I understand what he's saying, but there is a crack in his logic. Not a put down, it happens so frequently that it's merely a talking point, not a belief shatterer (although there is always hope that one thought will lead to another...)

Among the many almost universal inborn spiritual traits humans share no matter when or where they are born is exhibited in the varied forms of "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." It is a shared belief between the atheistically inclined and the ones who like to exercise their knees frequently.

And when you think about it, "God" is responsible for a helluva lot more lack of restraint in killing people than atheists are...

No big argument, just a passing thought.

by MedfordTim on 05/18/2008 12:34:27 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The categorical imperative is basically the humanist alternative to a theist based morality. 

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 05/18/2008 01:54:52 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: