McCain plays the "Service" card

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
I've been waiting for this. Over the last week or so, I've been noticing more references than normal to McCain's military service in his talking points. I chalked it up to the pressure he's been under for not supporting the G.I.Bill.

But now, in response to some chiding by Obama, McCain has pulled it out and told Obama to to see how far his stream goes.

"I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those (Veterans) who did." Full transcript below.

Translation: Only McCain is allowed to have an opinion on military matters because he is a Vet. Please pass me the puke bucket...

What it leads to is the utterly ridiculous notion that a person can't possibly be a Commander-In-Chief if they haven't been in the military. Just wait.

What Obama said:

"I can’t believe why he believes it is too generous to our veterans, I could not disagree with him and the president more on this issue. There are many issues that lend themselves to partisan posturing, but giving our veterans the chance to go to college should not be one of them.”

Here's Senator McCain's full statement. (Short version: "Wah wah wah")

"It is typical, but no less offensive that Senator Obama uses the Senate floor to take cheap shots at an opponent and easy advantage of an issue he has less than zero understanding of. Let me say first in response to Senator Obama, running for President is different than serving as President. The office comes with responsibilities so serious that the occupant can't always take the politically easy route without hurting the country he is sworn to defend. Unlike Senator Obama, my admiration, respect and deep gratitude for America's veterans is something more than a convenient campaign pledge. I think I have earned the right to make that claim.

"When I was five years old, a car pulled up in front of our house in New London, Connecticut, and a Navy officer rolled down the window, and shouted at my father that the Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor. My father immediately left for the submarine base where he was stationed. I rarely saw him again for four years. My grandfather, who commanded the fast carrier task force under Admiral Halsey, came home from the war exhausted from the burdens he had borne, and died the next day. I grew up in the Navy; served for twenty-two years as a naval officer; and, like Senator Webb, personally experienced the terrible costs war imposes on the veteran. The friendships I formed in war remain among the closest relationships in my life. The Navy is still the world I know best and love most. In Vietnam, where I formed the closest friendships of my life, some of those friends never came home to the country they loved so well.

"But I am running for the office of Commander-in-Chief. That is the highest privilege in this country, and it imposes the greatest responsibilities. It would be easier politically for me to have joined Senator Webb in offering his legislation. More importantly, I feel just as he does, that we owe veterans the respect and generosity of a great nation because no matter how generously we show our gratitude it will never compensate them fully for all the sacrifices they have borne on our behalf.

"Senators Graham, Burr and I have offered legislation that would provide veterans with a substantial increase in educational benefits. The bill we have sponsored would increase monthly education benefits to $1500; eliminate the $1200 enrollment fee; and offer a $1000 annually for books and supplies. Importantly, we would allow veterans to transfer those benefits to their spouses or dependent children or use a part of them to pay down existing student loans. We also increase benefits to the Guard and Reserve, and even more generously to those who serve in the Selected Reserve.

"I know that my friend and fellow veteran, Senator Jim Webb, an honorable man who takes his responsibility to veterans very seriously, has offered legislation with very generous benefits. I respect and admire his position, and I would never suggest that he has anything other than the best of intentions to honor the service of deserving veterans. Both Senator Webb and I are united in our deep appreciation for the men and women who risk their lives so that the rest of us may be secure in our freedom. And I take a backseat to no one in my affection, respect and devotion to veterans. And I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those who did.

"The most important difference between our two approaches is that Senator Webb offers veterans who served one enlistment the same benefits as those offered veterans who have re-enlisted several times. Our bill has a sliding scale that offers generous benefits to all veterans, but increases those benefits according to the veteran's length of service. I think it is important to do that because, otherwise, we will encourage more people to leave the military after they have completed one enlistment. At a time when the United States military is fighting in two wars, and as we finally are beginning the long overdue and very urgent necessity of increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps, one study estimates that Senator Webb's bill will reduce retention rates by 16%.

"Most worrying to me, is that by hurting retention we will reduce the numbers of men and women who we train to become the backbone of all the services, the noncommissioned officer. In my life, I have learned more from noncommissioned officers I have known and served with than anyone else outside my family. And in combat, no one is more important to their soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen, and to the officers who command them, than the sergeant and petty officer. They are very hard to replace. Encouraging people not to choose to become noncommissioned officers would hurt the military and our country very badly. As I said, the office of President, which I am seeking, is a great honor, indeed, but it imposes serious responsibilities. How faithfully the President discharges those responsibilities will determine whether he or she deserves the honor. I can only tell you I intend to deserve the honor if I am fo rtunate to receive it, even if it means I must take politically unpopular positions at times and disagree with people for whom I have the highest respect and affection.

"Perhaps, if Senator Obama would take the time and trouble to understand this issue he would learn to debate an honest disagreement respectfully. But, as he always does, he prefers impugning the motives of his opponent, and exploiting a thoughtful difference of opinion to advance his own ambitions. If that is how he would behave as President, the country would regret his election."




Can you imagine what John McCain must have been like at 6 years old? On a playground? Hands on his hips, stomping his feet, holding his breath?

"...an issue he has less than zero understanding of."


Really? NO understanding? Is John McCain truly so insecure in his manhood that he would resort to such schoolyard taunts? This speech boils down to a red faced kid yelling, "Oh, YEAH? Well, You don't know nothing and if you did know anything I'd STILL know more than you 'cause I've been on this playground longer and **I** get to make the rules because you don't know nothin' anyhow!"


John, you're 71. Grow up.


< Bush-authorized torture = war crimes said FBI | Flak against Byrd & Ted Kennedy?? >
 Display:
instances that McBush has zero understanding of.
He seems so weak

by Chinese Democracy on 05/22/2008 08:22:57 PM EST


I have lost so much respect for this man.  Talk about a sell out.  It's so entertaining to have a democratic nominee that actually stands up to the republicans though!  A lot more fun than Kerry was.  We can look forward to many more little-boy snits and old-man gaffs from McCain. 

by desertpear on 05/22/2008 08:26:51 PM EST


is barely keeping a lid on his rage.

by hazmat on 05/22/2008 09:27:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]
That must be why he looks so damn uncomfortable in his skin every time I see him in front of the camera.

by desertpear on 05/22/2008 09:35:54 PM EST

[ Parent ]

The good Senator is profoundly "worried" about retention. He's afriad that the troops will run off and get, gasp, an education!

Dont worry Sen. McCain, the Rumsfeld plan took care of that for you , the DOD has been running off career service members since Bush took office:

....benefits for active duty have eroded significantly since Bush took office . Retirees dont even talk about it any more...and no, we dont get free health care or much of anything else.

But you have stumbled across the dirty little secret of the Rumsfeld molded DOD.

 

I call it the Wal-mart Military. Senior NCO billets have been drastically reduced. Your chances of reaching E-6,  unless you are in a extremely high demand specialty, are fairly limited. More restrictive tenure rules preclude service member from ever reaching retirement or other eligibilty points.

The Repubs say they want is a highly mobile force. What the really mean is mobile in the sense of high turnover so they can have low cost , entry level troops with no long term commitment.

They are doing this to cut manpower costs and plow the money  back to the biggest GOP political contributors and revolving door employers: Defense contractors.

Hence the cuts in Veterans care, funding for infrastructure that supports troops; barracks, habitability, education programs and so on.

Throw in a drain like Iraq and they are breaking the all volunteer force in the process.

Just think, these guys love America and support the troops.  As with all things with these so called conservatives..its all about the money.

But hey, nothing a good Flag pin won't cure.

 

by MRFred on 05/23/2008 12:43:10 AM EST


They want them to become mercenaries.

by ProfRich on 05/23/2008 01:55:39 AM EST

[ Parent ]
They will out source that too. There is a percentage of "Blackwater boys" that are not even American.

by z1p101 on 05/23/2008 02:30:10 AM EST

[ Parent ]
"There is a percentage of "Blackwater boys" that are not even American."

There is a large percentage of American military service people who are not even American.

by KenTX on 05/23/2008 04:11:08 PM EST

[ Parent ]

It is a way to earn your citizenship and not just a pay check. From your link...

“And at the end of that enlistment, then you would be eligible to become a citizen.”

We have been doing it  since the beginning of our country. It is a pretty good way for immigrants to proove their loyalty to the US.

Keep spinning spinboy. 

by z1p101 on 05/23/2008 04:17:49 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Maybe he can.

The non-American US soldier pledges his loyalty to the US, is indoctrinated, if not brainwashed to love and serve the US, is beholden to and answerable to the US (and its laws for that matter) whereas the Blackwater guy is beholden to his CEO and his paychek (an no laws at all.)

This is a stupid argument, Ken 

by ProfRich on 05/27/2008 09:30:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]
why doesn't this topic make it to the forefront of the presidential debates especially when joe-bible-thumping-gun-clut ching-thinks-Obama-is-musil im-red-neck opens his earholes? the hypocrisy is so frustrating it's comical.

by satanisreal on 05/23/2008 02:33:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: