EYES WIDE SHUT!!! Are we safter yet??? Deja vu 1929 ...

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit

The comparison to the 1930-1933 period is striking. Stock market patterns, debt levels, interest rate cycles, sentiment levels, and banking reserves are all aligning for a credit crunch and major asset deflation.

.

Pct GDP Spent-Health Care ........................... ................. Pct of Incomes in Taxes

caldems.com/ healthcare-snapshots

1929 deja vu

ltadvisors.net/ CreditExtremeEmotion

We believe “severe macroeconomic repercussions” are highly likely and that “banking system capital” will be impaired. Continuing from our previous article “Credit Extreme Emotion,” the comparison to the 1930-1933 period is striking. Stock market patterns, debt levels, interest rate cycles, sentiment levels, and banking reserves are all aligning for a credit crunch and major asset deflation.

National Debt Pct of GDP

mramseyking.com

bigpicture.typepad.com/ finance

"Despite the braying about the credit crisis being over, the economy about to rebound and stocks entering a new bull market, the fundamentals not only remain crappy, they are worsening.

Months ago, Goldman’s CFO said there was a historic disconnect between the stock market and the credit market. But that’s not the entire story. There is also a historic disconnect between L’Affaire Bear and the credit markets and the economy.

Because the US financial system did not implode when Bear was rescued, people assume all is well in the credit markets and financial system. This is a gross miscalculation. The Fed proved this last Friday when it expanded its record credit-creation gimmicks and loosed collateral standards to a new all-time low.

Bloomberg: The Federal Reserve said the proportion of U.S. banks making it tougher for companies and consumers to borrow approached a record in the past three months as the credit crunch deepened. A net 70 percent of banks increased loan rates over their cost of funds for commercial and industrial borrowing, according to the central bank's quarterly survey of senior loan officers released today in Washington. That compares with 45 percent in the January survey, the Fed said.

As we stated several missives ago, there is no way the US economy, which has never been more dependent on debt to generate GDP, can flourish without an enormous amount of debt creation. If debt is now being curtailed or rationed, there can be only one direction for the US economy.

Morgan Stanley economist Richard Brenner: DISCONNECT - The economic fallout begins: Financial turmoil peaked six weeks ago, but the economic downturn is only beginning. It’s still a recession, in our view, and that’s no longer in the price. Indeed, reflecting higher energy quotes and slipping growth abroad, we see weaker US growth over the next few quarters than we did a month ago

The Times of London: After the crunch, a crisis in banking confidence Credit risk – that of borrowers not repaying loans – was cited as the next-biggest risk after liquidity. Consumer indebtedness was also a worry. A senior banker in an American bank said: “Consumers are in worse shape than most observers appreciate … their failure rate will look like a tsunami to those lollygagging on the financial beaches.”

< Number of soldier suicides may overtake combat deaths | Follow this logic >
 Display:
Interesting comparison, the comparison you make is partial. What is missing from the analysis is how both in the 1920s and today Republicans are making the same spurious and empirically and theoretically invalid assumptions of a economy. Both in the 1920s and since the 1980s the logic of "supply-side economics", cutting taxes for the rich premised on the false assumption that giving the supposedly most "productive" members of society more money induces more investment and creates jobs. Well the entire claim is invalid both in terms of theory and in terms of empirical reality.

What happens usually is when the rich are given incentives such as cutting the capital gains tax, they tend to invest in the stock market or other asset markets, and they create bubbles. The rich do invest more, but in speculation not in productive assets. It is no coincidence that the US experienced a higher rate of growth, and at that more equitable growth when wealth went from the bottom to the top, under the Keynesian Welfare State. Regardless, capitalism is doomed to some crisis whichever form of accumulation it takes.

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 05/06/2008 06:47:12 PM EST


 Display: