The Group of 15

The pathetic Democratic capitulation on FISA is depressing to be sure. Sen. Feingold sounded pretty depressed when spoke to us about it yesterday on our show. He echoed the same frustration we have had for months now:

"It's the latest chapter of running for cover when the Administration tries to intimidate Democrats on national security issues. It's the most embarrassing failure of the Democrats I've seen since 2006, other than the failure to vote to end the Iraq war ... It's letting George Bush and Dick Cheney have their way even though they're that unpopular and on their way out. It's really incredible."

That really sums it up. And when I asked him why the Democrats were folding, he gave a frank response. I asked him whether it was because they were being craven, cowardly or complicit. He simply said the first two. You can watch the interview here (transcript included).

I think the Democrats who voted with the Republicans in this case are actually worse than Joe Lieberman. That's a heavy charge. Why? Because at least we know what we're getting with Lieberman. Before Lieberman was not upfront about his positions and we had to educate people on them. But now everyone knows Sen. Lieberman is an avid and enthusiastic neocon. He's almost principled in sticking to those convictions, no matter how much we might disagree with him. Now, that he's largely given up the façade of being a Democrat, I mind him a lot less.

Whereas these other capitulating Democrats have neither courage nor convictions. It's more than a little embarrassing. I almost feel bad for them. Their weakness reeks. You have to avert your eyes to not look at them with some degree of pity and scorn.

Yet, out of the ashes of this disaster I see some hope. Why? Because for so long it was just Feingold who fought the good fight. Then Dodd joined. Somewhere after his 2004 loss, John Kerry got emboldened. He was then met by the old lion, Ted Kennedy. Leahy, Wyden, Boxer and now Bernie Sanders and Sherrod Brown have picked up the fight from time to time. And they were all on the list of 15 who did the right thing here.

And it grows. From a few they became many.

And now we have The Group of 15. The fifteen senators who this time had the courage to stand up to Bush. Some of the people on this list are new to the fight. There are some who should be on the list but aren't (no, I don't mean Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, they have never fought Bush, so their absence is totally unsurprising; yes, I'm looking at you Sheldon Whitehouse). Of course, Senator Kennedy would be on here if he was healthy. But overall, this is a start. This is fifteen United States Senators we can be proud of today:

Joseph Biden, DE
Barbara Boxer, CA
Sherrod Brown, OH
Maria Cantwell, WA
Chris Dodd, CT
Dick Durbin, IL
Russ Feingold, WI
Tom Harkin, IA
John Kerry, MA
Frank Lautenberg, NJ
Patrick Leahy, VT
Robert Menendez, NJ
Bernie Sanders, VT
Chuck Schumer, NY
Ron Wyden, OR

You might say that this is way too little, way too late. I would be more than tempted to agree with you. I understand this trend has been maddeningly slow to materialize. But we're going to need these fighters. Just because Bush leaves doesn't mean the fight is over. The process of getting Senate Democrats a spine is glacial but essential.

And they should also be on notice. If they get a Democratic president to work with, they will be all out of excuses. No more waiting for the next election. These fifteen have to rally the rest and actually get something done!

Young Turks on You Tube

< Bush's Reaction to War | How Not To Vote >
 Display:
There were also 129 representatives to be proud of.
128 democrats and 1 republican.

What is very bad is that Obama promised to
try and stop any bill with telecom immunity.
He did not even show up.

by beelzibub on 06/26/2008 03:28:47 PM EST

Thanks for posting the names of the courageous senators and I'm glad to see my state's Maria Cantwell on the list.  I remain really mystified about the fact that so many dems voted for this bill, even with the craven and cowardly theory.  Have things devolved that far?  If I believe that, it is really depressing.  Hope for the hopeless!

by desertpear on 06/26/2008 03:57:54 PM EST

what do you expect when the democrats are led by a guy like harry reid. he says he'll vote against the bill, but he also voted against the filibuster. 

democrats dont stand up for anything, they just do what their told so they can move up in the party leadership

by orangnblue122 on 06/26/2008 04:27:57 PM EST

I read a recommended diary on DailyKos today from a former defense attorney that gives an interesting view on FISA that places the emphasis on the USA Patriot Act.

Here is an excerpt:

I'm sure [Barack Obama] recognizes that this bill is a classic political bait-and-switch, wrapping telecom immunity in the mantle of "safeguarding our constitutional rights," when in fact those rights are already voided by use of secret, non-reviewable FISA warrants to gather information for criminal cases.  I'm sure Barack Obama realizes that this petty knoll is not "the hill to die on."

"The hill to die on" is the [Patriot Act's] breaking down the wall of separation between intelligence-gathering and criminal investigation.  And that is not even at issue yet.  We'll need a Democratic president, and at least 60 Democratic senators, to fight that battle. 

Link to "A Pragmatist's View on FISA"

by desertpear on 06/26/2008 07:02:55 PM EST

For some, it's never the right time to do the right thing.
Hillary found lots of excuses over the years to waffle.
In his first real test of leadership, Obama failed.
Do you think he would have backed the bill if he was
still running against her?

by beelzibub on 06/27/2008 08:13:03 AM EST

 Display: