Jump to: Video clips / Sidebar menu / Blog entries
posted by JaimeH 06/29/2008 04:11:41 PM EST
game, I loved every second of it! Glued to the screen I was!
Yo tengo mucho orgullo para la madre patria! !!!VIVA ESPAÑA!!!
Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/
I don't care about soccer. Don't hate it, just don't care.
One thing I do hate is when a guy scores a goal, chases the ball down, shoves it in his shirt and runs around like he is pregnant and finally gives birth to the soccer ball.
Don't get me wrong, their or a lot of celebrations in sports I can't stand but that is the worst.
Came to mind when y'all were talking about whether soccer was a girl or boy sport. Boys acting like girls.
Skill vs. Brute Force?
Any ape (aka Ken) could hit another animal, and feel proud of being able to stand on its two feet long enough to accomplish that feat...OR...it could have the beauty and skill of dancing with a ball coordinating all his senses to evade the other players and the goalie to make a beautiful and almost impossible goal.
If you don't know anything about football don't insult it. You just look foolish.
I am not going to attack soccer for not being a game of skill and no reasonable poster here is. But to pretend football doesn't require grace, skill, balance, strategy, timing etc. etc. etc. is obviously ridiculous. Have you ever seen a game? And Ken is right, Earl had a grace and balance that was truly awe-inspiring. Have you ever seen Barry Sanders, O.J. Simpson or Gayle Sayers run?
Hell, turn on your TV and take a gander at Vince Young this coming season.
Spend some time watching old clips of Rice or Largent. Or Randy Moss these days.
Do you know who the Freak is and what he can do?
Can Manning and Brady's skill sets be defined as "hitting another animal"? No decision making there, or finesse, or technique? Please.
Even a good tackle has amazing footwork. The Redskins kicker evidently kicked a field goal of 110 yards in practice the other day. Just another guy "knocking over another animal" huh?
Truth be told, football requires most of the same skills soccer does PLUS many others. I guess you do the ball handling with your hands instead of feet but feet are more important than hands in football too. The big difference is in football there is a rigid division of labor, in soccer the division is much more fluid.
Look, Nick, you are a nice, bright, earnest young man but this is a joke. And I know Ken was being a jerkoff about it but I am gonna give you piece of unsolicited advice.
If your only defense is "Ken was doing it too" you don't really have much of a defense at all.
Here is what I have to say about that.
"the NFL bores me"- Me too mostly. I watch College Football which is all about the passion. Pay attention to other people's posts.
"Do I believe there is a qualitative difference btween the two? Yes, soccer is more a sport of the intellect than the body. Football is the opposite for the most part"- You have no idea what you are talking about. Football requires 11 guys on each side executing a series of complex tasks in perfect unison. The level of planning, tactics and strategy involved is enormous. The fact that you only see 22 guys hitting each other speaks volumes of your inability to understand the sport. Soccer looks like a few guys running around while other guys stand there and do nothing. It looks like, more or less, individual actors trying to succeed with maybe one or two teammates actively helping at any given time. I am willing to give it the benefit of the doubt and assume there is a lot going on I don't see and understand because I am not a close-minded know-it-all.
"this is why American football will never be popularized outside of the US."- So? It outsells hockey. Does that mean hockey sucks? Do you really think I care how many countries play a sport when I am watching it? Does that increase your enjoyment of the sport? Weird.
"US. Football is a sport of (ironically) the rich, while soccer is the sport of the people."- Not sure what you mean by this. Understand I love College Football, not pro. And I like high school too (coached it) and believe me, I wasn't coaching rich kids.
"Soccer appeals to me for its intellectualism, populism, and unifying force.Football appeals to me for its brutishness."- Don't criticize what you can't understand - BD
So soccer is intellectual but the movements and decisions of the 22 players on a football field are random animal instinct. I tell you what you get eleven of the most athletic soccer players you can find together and I will get a good small high school veer option team and lets see if you can stop them. I know it won't happen but it would teach you so much you don't understand about football.
I know that football has "plays" and playbooks that negotiate strategies to avoid the other teams defensive line. I would argue that the only intellectual aspect of football and grace involves the running back and the quarter back, that takes talent and strategy. The rest, including the receivers, do not have to be terribly intelligent to do what they do...avoid apes or destroy them. I am not insulting football, I like watching it too at times, it has its virtues, however in my opinion it really doesn't hold a candle to "soccer" or better known as futbol. Football gets boring because its interrupted so many times by the mere logic of the game, its so ridiculously labour intensive that I can't imagine myself playing it. Futbol is a game ANYONE can play, and anyone can imagine playing. To me, this is not merely an issue of the virtues of the actual game but who these games represent.Football = rich, every American is rich even the poor kids you mentored by world standards. You need a certain level of nutrition, body mass, a oddly shaped ball that essentially can only be bought, and expensive equipment. Futbal= the game of the masses, all you need is a ball, two feet, and a quick mind. The ball is an actual ball, meaning it can be made of just about anything, you don't need any equipment, and most important its more intellectual because it forces YOU to think and develop your own skills...not those found in a book. Futbal > Football in my books...its not only a game its a way of life.
This is the "know-it-all's" opinion and it has been written.
We disagree.
I don't believe for a second it takes any more intellectual ability to play soccer than football.
I have played both and you, evidently, haven't.
Being an inside linebacker, cornerback, safety, center and many other positions are fairly cerebral. Ironically, running back is not.
Beyond that, I think we are through here.
But when he bolted in the 1990s he got away, didn't he?
The man still defines elusive!
Anyway, he's Jayar's problem. I don't like USC at all.
Got my 2008 Phil Steele Colleg Football. In the process of reading every page. Texas looks good but well short of great (I am predicting another 10-3 year but it could be worse.)
The really exciting news is we have a starting RB named Fozzy!!!! (Foswhitt Whittaker) My wife asked if he was black. He better be good because I liked our #2 guy last year, Vondrell.
I like both OSU and USC this year (I don't really like either team but you know what I mean).
And speaking of teams I don't like but like to win it all, those damn Sooners are loaded everywhere. Sonsabitches.
Texas has a tough row to hoe this year. OU (Dal), at Mizz, Kan, at Tech and the rivalry against A&M! Okie St looks decent too (though those poor bastards can't seem to beat us no matter how hard we try to lose! Luckily Arkansas (in Austin) looks like they are gonna dropoff after losing two great backs.
Kid can play no doubt.
Boeckman should be better as most of the line is back. I hate to tell you this but the gap between the SEC and Big 10 in speed is real its just not what people think. The difference is in big man speed. The Big 10 has no answer for the genetic freaks on the D-line the SEC puts out there. Both OSU champs were lost becuase the SEC DL's just outquicked the OSU lines. Its not the little fast guys that are the problem. Its the big boys who can run a 4.6 that eat y'all alive!