More Hillarity from HillaryIs44.com

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!
http://www.hillaryis44.org/ ?p=647

When will Obama concede?  LOLWUT?

Some of my favorites:

As we wrote in Part I, Obama is unelectable and not qualified to be president. Obama will either concede now or face defeat in NOvember and concede to John McCain.

The polls don't agree with you, you utter freakshows.

The cappuccino versus coffee Democratic divide between upper class and working voters continued. Coffee Democrats were more likely to back Clinton while cappuccino Democrats were more likely to back Obama. That these divisions were also deepened by gender and racial identity -- rooted in long-sought historic firsts for women and blacks -- means that there exists an unprecedented intra-party burden that befalls Obama.

"Cappucino vs. coffee."  Cute.

No Democrat that cares about the issues should vote for Barack Obama. No Democrat that cares about the FDR coalition that wins elections should vote for Barack Obama.

It goes on and on and on.  When will these people grow the hell up?

< The Tsunami | What is with this ad on the TYT site? >
 Display:

I post and read many other sites beside the TYT website (although I don't post much here anymore since there's more debate elsewhere) but I thought I'd add in a couple little bits that toss aside the Hillaryis44 folks pretty effectively. First off, the place is run by someone who is at worst a right-wing agitator, and at best someone just playing an elaborate joke. For more info, go to http://www.politic o.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/A _campaign_mystery_solved_Hi llaryIs44.html

 Secondly, a fellow on Kos did a study of posters on that website and Hillaryis44, and found some interesting statistics. See this website: http://www.dailyko s.com/story/2008/5/24/16343 7/416/562/522170

 Yeah, it turns out that the 100000 posts the guy looked at, on DKos they were made by 8000+ different posters, which is totally realistic. At Hillaryis44, it only took 301 different posters to reach that number.

Which is why I don't worry about Hillaryis44 anymore.
 

by Khabi on 06/06/2008 11:04:30 AM EST


When Lyndon Johnson embraced civil rights, Richard Nixon embraced the racists. Forty years later, Hillary Clinton attracted the racist dittoheads left in the Democratic Party, or the ones who switched parties just to vote for her.

There aren't many Dixiecrats like Zell Miller left in the Democratic Party. The few that remain probably wouldn't vote for Clinton in a general election either. Some Hillary 'supporters' have been interviewed recently. They complain about the liberals. They say they switched from Republican to vote for her, and would never vote for a black man they claim to know nothing about. 

I just don't believe that these dinosaur dittoheads represent more than 1% of the Democratic party--if they really are Democrats at all and not from the Chaos Party as they appear to be.

by zenie on 06/06/2008 12:29:44 PM EST


voting for the conservative blue dog Dems that Harry Reid described as a big pain in the ass?

There must be enough of them to elect these a holes somewhere.

by Chinese Democracy on 06/06/2008 02:12:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: