Americans are no longer "special"

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!
What do I mean by "special"? I mean that for nearly 200 years Americans had major advantages over all other nations due to the superiority of system of government, freedom, resource base and capitalist economy. These advantages have allowed us to become the worlds greatest economy for the last 50-100 years and the most powerful nation by far post WWII. This has lead the current generations to feel entitled to this advantage. Simply by being born in America we should only have to complete high school, find any job working 40 hours a week and we should be provided a home in the suburbs, 2 cars in the garage, a boat at the lake, steak and potatoes for dinner every night, 3 TVs with cable and a cell phone for everyone in the house. As a nation we feel entitled to consume 25% of the worlds resources with only 5% of the population, no matter how few of those resources we can produce domestically anymore.

The problem is we're no longer special. By spreading capitalism and democracy across the globe we no longer hold a monopoly on this advantageous system. It was easy to out compete communism, they were playing with one arm tied behind their back due to their flawed system. It is much harder to out compete fellow capitalists, especially ones that are far more determined and hungry than we are. There are over 2 billion people in Asia who want their fair share of the limited global resources and they're willing to fight (economically at least) to get them.

Maintaining our advantage over them, especially in terms of resource throughput will become increasingly difficult. Huge increases in price of all commodities over the past few years have lead to significant inflation as the developing world outbids us for supplies. This trend is unlikely to reverse anytime soon. It will inevitably lead to lower disparity between standards of living in the US compared to other nations. It will also mean that achieving the "American Dream" will require people to work harder/smarter and may even become out of reach to some. There will certainly be more people who are classified as "poor" rather than everyone not homeless being considered "middle class". Free rides will be much harder to come by, especially for the lazy and the stupid.

One way for us to improve our chances of maintaining a high level of global power through this transition will be to radically reduce the material throughput of our economy. Economics is not a zero sum game. Someone else getting richer does not necessarily mean that we have to get poorer. While there is a finite amount of iron, copper, land, oil, coal, etc., there is not a finite amount of technology, knowledge, entertainment and other services. To a degree we're already making that transition. However, we also need to make the transition to lower impact daily lives as well. We need to use less energy, we need to buy products that are durable, not just inexpensive, we need to increase recycling, we need to invest heavily in domestic renewable energy. All of these things would reduce the amount that our economy and daily lives are exposed to commodities that we will increasingly have to compete for. By doing so we limit the amount of pain that we will feel as a result of the inevitable growth of the rest of the world.

If we fail to adapt we will suffer the consequences that befall any nation that fails to adapt to a new reality and it won't be pretty. Luckily one advantage that Americans have always had is our adaptability. Lets all hope we haven't lost that too.


< New McCain Campaign Ad | Has the Internet helped Democracy? >
 Display:
Especially the last couple of paragraphs.  Just dead on as far as I'm concerned.

by bfaul on 06/09/2008 10:25:14 AM EST



I caution against having expectations of America regaining the sort of status it held through most of the last century. George Bush has ensured that the rest of the world has knocked us off that pedastal, probably for all time.

Someone else getting richer does not necessarily mean that we have to get poorer

Sorry, but that is American Capitalism in a nutshell. Until that component gets fixed and FAIR market beats out FREE market at all levels, the poor WILL get poorer.

we need to buy products that are durable

Durable? With the planned obselesence mind set of the manufacturing industries? Edison's original light bulb still lights - how often do you have to change a bulb? We have to BUILD durable products instead of crap which will fall apart in a year or two.

there is not a finite amount of ... other services.

There may not be a finite amount of them, but if the majority of people are working in a services sector instead of manufacturing, you haven't fixed anything, just slowed the inevitable demise.

Free rides will be much harder to come by, especially for the lazy and the stupid

Okay, NOW you have me worried...;-)

by MedfordTim on 06/09/2008 11:19:44 AM EST


"What do I mean by "special"? I mean that for nearly 200 years Americans had major advantages over all other nations due to the superiority of system of government, freedom, resource base and capitalist economy. T"

Slavery? Forgot that aspect of American history that enabled so much surplus accumulation to enable industrialization in the US, never-mind the land grabs against the natives and Mexicans. So its only been "special" for a few Americans while the rest were either killed off, or enslaved. Then again your whole argument is based on white racism, pretending to be American nationalism.

"As a nation we feel entitled to consume 25% of the worlds resources with only 5% of the population, no matter how few of those resources we can produce domestically anymore. "

This entitlement society came from Reagan more than anyone else, who instilled in the American people the "entitlement" of being American, the exceptionalism of being an American. It has been the Republicans and their severe adherence to irrational individualism that has enabled such a shift towards this sense of "entitlement" and extreme selfishness.

"The problem is we're no longer special. By spreading capitalism and democracy across the globe we no longer hold a monopoly on this advantageous system. "

You were no longer special in 1971, get over yourself.

"It was easy to out compete communism, they were playing with one arm tied behind their back due to their flawed system."

More myths...its so easy you killed millions around the world, overthrew countless democracies that voted or were going to vote left/communist, invaded Vietnam and countless other nations, supported the rise of Islamism, wasted trillions on wasteful consumption in terms of military expenditure, and spied on your own citizens. Ya, it was "so easy"....go learn some history not the disney fairy-tale you learn in American schools. (Again, I actually study these things, you do not!)

" It is much harder to out compete fellow capitalists, especially ones that are far more determined and hungry than we are. "

No, they are just smarter than you are. They have successfully mixed government intervention with business to create monster corporations, monopolies at home, and dumping abroad. The problem is the the US has abandoned the role of the state and has let the private sector destroy the US economy and itself in the name of profit.

" It is much harder to out compete fellow capitalists, especially ones that are far more determined and hungry than we are. "

Impossible without debt and war.

"It will also mean that achieving the "American Dream" will require people to work harder/smarter and may even become out of reach to some. "

The American Dream died a while ago, I am not sure if you got the memo? Social mobility in the US is among the lowest in the OECD and so is the standard of living, the peace index, journalistic integrity, etc.

"Free rides will be much harder to come by, especially for the lazy and the stupid."

Well you got the last point down pat! The real free riders have been corporations who do not pay taxes and yet benefit from the socialized infrastructure and corporate welfare of the War in Iraq, and bailouts (Bear Sterns), who is saving the poor, especially the WORKING POOR in the US? Stop with this bull-shit.

"One way for us to improve our chances of maintaining a high level of global power through this transition will be to radically reduce the material throughput of our economy. "

De-industrialize further than you already have basically? Sure lets do the same thing that we have done to get us into this hole in the first place! GENIUS idea!

"Someone else getting richer does not necessarily mean that we have to get poorer."

That doesn't happen if you have progressive taxation, otherwise YES it always happens.

"While there is a finite amount of iron, copper, land, oil, coal, etc., there is not a finite amount of technology, knowledge, entertainment and other services. "

To "neoclassical" theory those things are rents on actual productive capacities, meaning they do not create wealth on their own. This is why the US is in debt, its not actual producing anything.

"If we fail to adapt we will suffer the consequences that befall any nation that fails to adapt to a new reality and it won't be pretty. "

With already $10 trillion in debt, your interest payments will consume about 50% of the federal budget within the next 2 decades, sorry but its really too late to do anything. America, a subsidiary of China Inc. China has you BY THE BALLS, and America deserves it for its ignorance.



Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 06/09/2008 01:05:04 PM EST


"It will also mean that achieving the "American Dream" will require people to work harder/smarter and may even become out of reach to some. "

"The American Dream died a while ago, I am not sure if you got the memo? Social mobility in the US is among the lowest in the OECD and so is the standard of living, the peace index, journalistic integrity, etc."
 
For the most part, the "American Dream" has ALWAYS been a farce; a marketing scheme to keep the lower classes hoping because morale is 9/10ths of the battle in having people oppressing themselves and saying, "Thank you, sir. Can I have some more, sir?"

But.

The execption doesn't necessarily prove the rule, but have you heard about a guy named Barack Obama? The dude is ABSOLUTELY living out the stereotype of the American Dream - and it's in color!!!

The only place in the world it could happen! (Well, except Bolivia. And Venezuela. And.........)

by MedfordTim on 06/09/2008 01:35:49 PM EST

[ Parent ]
has more mobility than the US, I can attest to that!

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 06/09/2008 04:02:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]

About that exeption: just for the record, the American Dream is not that anyone (poor, rich, black, blue, women, man, W., Obama) could amount to any height (US presidency), but that the great masses of the proles could attain a comfortable level of living without having to revolt against the upper class.

As such, it is in the nature of the American Dream that it is not soley reserved for the hard working smart people, but for anyone up from "mediocre". 

The American Dream is that of the great "middle class", and that dream died with Reagan. It's still around, but not in America. The American dream, in effect, is that of a social democracy as exists in Europe and Canada. The way to get the US back on track is not the anarcho-libertarian fairytale of service-based-economy-only coupled with a strongest-takes-all mentality that alphasigmookie proposes. The way to go is that of Europe and Canada (who, by the way, suffer remarkably less from China's ascent).

ps: nick, no offense, you were right on most things, but going around calling everyone ignorant won't help spread the good word. 

by Cogitor on 06/09/2008 04:59:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I'm not arguing.

The "official" definition, from the guy who first used the term is "that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement. It is a difficult dream for the European upper classes to interpret adequately, and too many of us ourselves have grown weary and mistrustful of it. It is not a dream of motor cars and high wages merely, but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position."

by MedfordTim on 06/09/2008 05:29:54 PM EST

[ Parent ]

"ps: nick, no offense, you were right on most things, but going around calling everyone ignorant won't help spread the good word. "

 Ok....just the 20% who consistently vote GOP.

Blog: http://perspectivos.blogspo t.com/

by Nick86 on 06/09/2008 11:11:00 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Some of them are greedy slimeballs.

by richardshort2001 on 06/09/2008 11:20:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]

That is about the height of it.  The rest of U.S. History is pretty much the story of the rich fucking everyone else.  That part is two, but we got a reach around for a couple of decades there.

You wanna understand the American Dream in reality watch McCabe and Mrs. Miller.  Maybe the greatest movie about America ever made.

by ProfRich on 06/10/2008 01:30:45 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: