Ballgame: McCain gives Ultimate Gaff

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit

This is getting ugly. McCain doesnt know what he's doing at this point.

Who is running his campaign?

http://www.huffingtonpost.c om/ilan-goldenberg/not-a-ga ffe-a-fundaemtnal_b_114394. html


John McCain made a mistake this evening, which as far as I'm concerned, disqualifies him from being president.  It is so appalling and so factually wrong that I'm actually sitting here wondering who McCain's advisers are.  This isn't some gaffe where he talks about the Iraq-Pakistan border.  It's a real misunderstanding of what has happened in Iraq over the past year.  It is even more disturbing because according to John McCain, Iraq is the central front in the "war on terror."  If we are going to have an Iraq-centric policy, he should at least understand what he is talking about.  But anyway, what happened.

On Katie Couric tonight McCain says:

Kate Couric: Senator McCain, Senator Obama says, while the increased number of US troops contributed to increased security in Iraq, he also credits the Sunni awakening and the Shiite government going after militias. And says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What's your response to that?

McCain: I don't know how you respond to something that is as -- such a false depiction of what actually happened. Colonel McFarlane [phonetic] was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening. I mean, that's just a matter of history. Thanks to General Petraeus, our leadership, and the sacrifice of brave young Americans. I mean, to deny that their sacrifice didn't make possible the success of the surge in Iraq, I think, does a great disservice to young men and women who are serving and have sacrificed.

One problem.  The surge wasn't even announced until a few months after the Anbar Awakening.  Via Spencer Ackerman, here is Colonel MacFarland explaining the Anbar Awakening to Pam Hass of UPI, on September 29, 2006.  That would be almost four months before the President even announced the surge.  Petraeus wasn't even in Iraq yet.

With respect to the violence between the Sunnis and the al Qaeda -- actually, I would disagree with the assessment that the al Qaeda have the upper hand. That was true earlier this year when some of the sheikhs began to step forward and some of the insurgent groups began to fight against al Qaeda. The insurgent groups, the nationalist groups, were pretty well beaten by al Qaeda.

This is a different phenomena that's going on right now. I think that it's not so much the insurgent groups that are fighting al Qaeda, it's the -- well, it used to be the fence-sitters, the tribal leaders, are stepping forward and cooperating with the Iraqi security forces against al Qaeda, and it's had a very different result. I think al Qaeda has been pushed up against the ropes by this, and now they're finding themselves trapped between the coalition and ISF on the one side, and the people on the other.

And here is the NY Times talking about the Anbar Awakening back in March 2007.

The formation of the group in September shocked many Sunni Arabs. It was the most public stand anyone in Anbar had taken against Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, which was founded by the Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

And here is Colin Kahl in Foreign Affairs:

The Awakening began in Anbar Province more than a year before the surge and took off in the summer and fall of 2006 in Ramadi and elsewhere, long before extra U.S. forces started flowing into Iraq in February and March of 2007. Throughout the war, enemy-of-my-enemy logic has driven Sunni decision-making. The Sunnis have seen three "occupiers" as threats: the United States, the Shiites (and their presumed Iranian patrons), and the foreigners and extremists in AQI. Crucial to the Awakening was the reordering of these threats.

This is not controversial history.  It is history that anyone trying out for Commander and Chief must understand when there are 150,000 American troops stationed in Iraq.  It is an absolutely essential element to the story of the past two years. YOU CANNOT GET THIS WRONG.  Moreover, what is most disturbing is that according to McCain's inaccurate version of history, military force came first and solved all of our problems.  If that is the lesson he takes from the Anbar Awakening, I am afraid it is the lesson he will apply to every other crisis he faces including, for example, Iran.

This is just incredibly disturbing. I have no choice but to conclude that John McCain has simply no idea what is actually happened and happening in Iraq. 

 

< McCain's Packers/Steelers 'confusion' | This weeks sad little GOP talking point >
 Display:

I think he's lazy.  I think he doesn't do much of anything and votes how he is told to vote and reads what he is told to read and assume he understands things.  I think he is just a man who does a half-ass job of trying to understand the issues.  He has never had a serious race and the media has never called him on anything.  I think he believes he is very bright and well informed but doesn't understand the difference between listening to the hacks that advise him and filling in the blanks with assumptions and doing actual hard research to make sure you get it.

He is an awful candidate and if the media wasn't so obsessed with Obama he would be destroyed in no time flat.  I posted earlier this is a man who got eviscerated by Meredith Viera on his strongest issue.  Not only is he not qualified to be president, he is not qualified to be Senator either.

by ProfRich on 07/23/2008 12:39:54 AM EST


I so agree 100%!  I keep worrying they will pull a different candidate out of their ass at the convention.  I don't think McCain even expected to be the nominee.  Fifth to the last in his class!!!  The guy is not that bright.

by desertpear on 07/23/2008 02:43:43 AM EST

[ Parent ]
The only thing that lends me to believe there is something redeeming about the South are your dead-on target comments. (Sorry Cal, great post by you too. We need to raise this everywhere so that the TV media pays attention while it's still fresh.)

by Weapon X on 07/23/2008 02:56:25 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Rich is real sensitive when it comes to that whole "southern profiling" thing.

by z1p101 on 07/23/2008 04:18:27 AM EST

[ Parent ]

For the record, I don't get touchy when people attack the south for its dumbass political record, I get upset when people (a) immediately assume if you are from the South, you are an idiot (I like Obama but this is what stopped Edwards, a much stronger candidate, from getting the nod) or (b) speak as if every southerner is a brain-dead Ken-style GOP racist zombie.  I accept that there are a lot of those, but the Pubs don't win Texas 99%-1%.  Since 1992, somewhere between 39%-59% of us have showed up and voted against the republican.

Also, I live in Austin which is kind of like the West Berlin of the South.  Ask Cenk, he was just here.

Finally, three things the rest of the blue nation seems to fail to understand about the South.  It is economically populist, it is chock full of minorities and it has 160 Electoral Votes of which the Dems have won ZERO since 1980.  Maybe constantly berating the entire region isn't really a smart way to go if you want to change the direction of the country.

by ProfRich on 07/23/2008 10:48:28 AM EST

[ Parent ]

This isnt the 1950s, its the digital age, he cant lay up and not expect people to call him on it.

Hes just looking more and more tired as it goes on.

by calturner on 07/23/2008 02:52:38 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Pleez pleez pleez, John McCain, pick Mitt Romney as your VP candidate. Pleeeeez!!!

by Verified1 on 07/23/2008 05:24:24 PM EST


 Display: