Georgia Russia Conflict, Guess What it's about? OIL!

Now that it's becoming clear that Russia is re-annexing part if not all of Georgia, maybe we should talk about why.

Okey dokey so I'm watching this Georgia Russia conflict business go down and I'm thinking to myself, "Gee whiz, I wonder what the actual reason for Russia invading Georgia is?" I heard a very passing mention on NPR about OIL! and I thought, "Yeah, that's gotta be it. There's shitloads of oil somewhere." Actually, I was already thinking that.

So a little google search brings me this bit of infomation from Global Security.ORG>

As it turns out, it's not so much about oil that's there, but the control of the flow of oil through there, namely a pipeline called the  Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline that transports oil from the Caspian Sea to the Turkish port city of Ceyhan. The agreement to build the pipeline was signed in Istanbul on on 18 Nov. 1999 and was called the Istanbul Declaration.

According to the article from Global Security.ORG, which is not dated but was clearly written before construction on the pipeline began in 2002, "The success of these projects would end an almost century-old Russian stranglehold on the oil and gas resources of the Caspian. The new pipelines are clearly is meant to weaken the influence of Russia in the region and therefore are regarded as hostile by the Russian Government."

This pipeline, as it would happen, passes through the disputed regions of Abkhazia and Ossetia. Another very helpful article about the pipeline is here.

An ominous prediction from GloablSecurity.org, probably made in 1999:

"Moscow might choose to cause more trouble in the Caucasus. It has fomented rebellions in the past and can do so again. Georgia, through which the new pipeline would pass, is particularly vulnerable. It blamed Moscow for backing the secession of Abkhazia and South Ossetia"

You don't say. So yeah, Cenk, I'm sure Russia's in the right. Sure.
< Hey Everyone, Let Me Know What You Think(!) | Driving across the states >
 Display:
Watched "American Enterprise Institute Panel on Russia & Georgia Military Conflict" on c-span. Ralph Peters was making a point about the Russians trying to knock it out.

by whoosh on 08/13/2008 04:45:06 PM EST

edit: "was trying to knock the pipeline out"

by whoosh on 08/13/2008 04:45:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Check McClatchy and Timesonline-- it looks like the Georgian guy attacked the breakaway regions first, which was the break the Russians were looking for.  Propaganda says who cares, but there may be an important point here.  Isn't John McBush mobbed up with a Georgia lobbiest?  Should the BushCo CIA know what our tool in the region Mr. Saakashvili was up to?  In the name of everything that runs on oil, did BushCo greenlight this fool?  What in the wide wide world of oil wars were they thinking?  And by the way, isn't it a little more than troubling that the Kurds attack on the BTC pipeline in Turkey appear to coincide with these blunders?  There is a price to be paid for hiring clowns.

by NicoloM on 08/13/2008 05:07:29 PM EST

I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this whole thing. I know that the Kurds have accused the U.S. of supporting Kurdish rebels, but I struggle to understand why. The BTC pipeline was the joint project of Turkey, our NATO ally, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, the agreement being signed under the auspices of the Clinton adminstration (Clinton was in Istanbul and signed the agreement as a witness.)

Why in Exxon's name would Bush have  Saakashvili provoke Russia so that they could destroy the pipeline? Doesn't that pipeline help to diminish the power of both Iran and Russia?

Something very f-ed up is going on here. Possibly something more evil than stuff us libs usually acuse those criminals of. I don't like it one bit. 

by duchessnoir on 08/13/2008 07:24:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: