Obama was sodomized on Saddleback Mountain!

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
In the first preseason scrimmage, John McCain demolished Barack Obama. It is easy to see now why Obama ran away from McCain when he offered to debate him every week in the summer.

Here was the Obama Campaign response.

backpeddle, backpeddle, backpeddle

The reviews are in.

Commander McCain destroyed the young crack smoker.

Even the liberal media admits McCain won big.

Liberals are now trying to say that the reason McCain kicked Obama's ass is because he cheated.

The New York Times is going nuts because John McCain beat Barack Obama like a drum!!!
< "Presidential Forum" - perfection! | The lying forwards from the Right Winged Ones >
 Display:
"Mr. McCain’s performance was well received."

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 04:00:44 AM EST


Since your posts attract attention and are purely Republican propaganda, as you admit (not that you could hide it), how do you like it if we use the comments section to rally for Obama?

 

by desertpear on 08/18/2008 12:11:26 PM EST

[ Parent ]
It drives the comment counter up so more people view the clips. The objective is to get the word out that Obama got smoked. Notice that ProfRich isn't participating. He gets it.

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 02:36:11 PM EST

[ Parent ]
As if a few ticks on the viewer total on a YouTube clip will change the election.  Lol.  Anyone here already knows enough not to click your dumb links.  Good luck with your desperate strategy!  But thanks for letting me know it is okay to spam your threads with pro-Obama materials. 

by desertpear on 08/18/2008 03:28:21 PM EST

[ Parent ]

When are you going to understand the difference between apathy and surrender.

by ProfRich on 08/18/2008 06:10:36 PM EST

[ Parent ]


"On March 29, 2007, McCain himself voted against H.R. 1591, an emergency spending bill that would have funded the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and would have provided more than $1 billion in additional funds to the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Senate passed H.R. 1591 by a margin of 51-47. Once the bill's conference report was agreed to by the House, the Senate again passed the measure on April 26, 2007, by a vote of 51-46. McCain did not vote on that version of the bill. By contrast, Obama voted for it on both occasions"

 

"Moreover, McCain has voted against other legislation funding care for veterans. On April 26, 2006, McCain voted against an amendment by Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI) that would have "provide[d] an additional $430,000,000 for the Department of Veteran Affairs for Medical Services for outpatient care and treatment for veterans.' In addition, on March 14, 2006, McCain voted against "increas[ing] Veterans medical services funding by $1.5 billion in FY 2007 to be paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes.' On March 10, 2004, McCain also voted against "creat[ing] a reserve fund to allow for an increase in Veterans' medical care by $1.8 billion by eliminating tax loopholes." Obama voted for the first two measures"

 

by Lib on 08/18/2008 08:13:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]

No one expected Obama to win over the Right Wing Anti-Jesus Christians by courageously appearing with Warren.  But he accomplished his objective by winning over enough Pro-Jesus Christians by his honesty and concern about real Christian issues to make a difference in that vote.  Plus, Obama won overall by establishing his reasonableness and intelligence to the vast majority of voters while McCain's painfully obvious cheating, lying, pandering, and war-mongering made the wrinkled, little, white-haired guy look really bad.  Now that Bush's Mini-Mac has opened the door on his infidelity, the media should try a little honest journalism for a change and do a little Edwards-style investigation of John Edwards-Mcain (Investigate e-Mac!!).

And, now that KO'dtex brought it up, someone should ask McCain about forced and voluntary sodomy when he was a POW.   They would certainly insist that it was necessary to ask if he was a Democrat. 

by honest abe on 08/18/2008 12:43:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Sorry, I checked all the links and I can't find the part where it explains how McCain's age, economic ineptitude and similarity to the Worst President of All Time don't disqualify him from holding a position more powerful than that of Hall Monitor.

by OneHitKill on 08/18/2008 05:25:07 AM EST


The reviews continue to pour in, and it's unanimous.

Barack.
Obama.
Got.
His.
Ass.
KICKED!!

I gotta tell you the truth. Republicans are not used to winning debates. George W. Bush wasn't good. His Dad wasn't good. Bob Dole wasn't good. Reagan was really good, but nobody remembers Reagan (except me and Tim).

Barack Obama was supposed to be "Mr Communicator", but without a teleprompter, he's "Mr Chopped Liver".

Johnny McCain comes down hard with an elbow from the sky! I did not see this coming at all.

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 09:07:28 AM EST


 

...by ANY stretch of a definition. It was a Q&A.

Wait for a real debate before ejaculating over McCain's performance in one, okay?

by MedfordTim on 08/18/2008 01:31:10 PM EST

[ Parent ]

 

  • Grew up in a prominent rightwing Navy family and was indoctrinated in naval dominance of the globe
  • Went to Annapolis and ranked at the very bottom of his class because he resented authority
  • Went to Vietnam and crashed several planes
  • Spent 6 years as a POW and "broke" under torture
  • Came home and dumped the wife who raised his children while he was away and nursed him back to health on his return
  • Married a much younger woman who was heir to a mobbed-up Budweiser fortune
  • Worked in his in-laws' business traveling across Arizona building a base for his political career
  • Used his in-laws' money to get elected to the House as an anti-abortion, "pro-family" candidate
  • Worked his way up from the House to the Senate by being a loyal right-wing Republican
  • As a Senator, got caught helping Charles Keating deregulate S&L's, which cost taxpayers $200 billion, and was censured by the Senate
  • Promised never to do favors for lobbyists again
  • Ran for President in 2000 as a reformer and won New Hampshire
  • Got crushed in South Carolina after he called Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell "agents of intolerance" and they fired back with a pro-Bush smear campaign that McCain had an "illegitimate black child" - actually a dark-skinned child (Bridget) adopted from impoverished Bangladesh. Nevertheless, McCain enthusiastically supported Bush both in 2000 and 2004.
  • In 2001, he opposed Bush's $1.35 trillion tax giveaway to the rich, but changed his position during the 2007 campaign.
  • In 2001, he was so opposed to Bush's far-right policies that he considered becoming a Democrat, but ultimately stayed a Republican and supported Bush's far-right policies
  • In 2002, he was a leading advocate for the invasion of Iraq, spent far more time on TV than any other Senator, and wrongly predicted "victory" and "success" every step of the way 
  • In 2004, he betrayed his friend John Kerry by refusing to defend him against Swift Boat smears
  • In 2007, when a supporter asked "How do we beat the bitch," referring to Sen. Hillary Clinton, McCain laughed and called it an "excellent question."
  • In 2007, with the U.S. on the brink of attacking Iran, McCain joked by singing "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran."
  • In 2008, when caught doing favors for lobbyist Vicki Iseman and her corporate clients, lied about his actions

 

 

http://www.democrats.com/mc cains-experience

Wrong about the war in  iraq-

"Wrong about the Iraqis paying for the reconstruction, wrong about whether or not the oil would pay for it, wrong about Sunni and Shia violence through the years, wrong about the willingness of the Iraqis to stand up for themselves"

Wrong on the surge-

McBush stated inaccurately, that the surge strategy was responsible for the much-touted "Anbar Awakening," in which Sunni sheiks turned against Al Qaeda, helping in turn to reduce violence in the country.

The record firmly establishes the opposite: instead of being caused by the surge, the key signs of the Anbar Awakening occurred not only before that strategy was implemented, but before it was ever conceived.

Wrong about time tables-

Democratically elected Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki supports a short timetable for US troops to withdraw from Iraq.

 

by Lib on 08/18/2008 08:29:21 PM EST

[ Parent ]
What a fucking joke.

by psyche2 on 08/18/2008 07:07:40 PM EST

[ Parent ]
My objection to these posts by KenTX aren't that they are anti-Obama, but that he just says over and over that Obama got his ass kicked and posts a bunch of links, but doesn't write anything of his own.
I don't like that when somebody from the liberal/progressive/left/De mocratic side does that either.

Now, if KenTX brought over 8 of his buddies to the site to do the same thing, then I think that would be too much and I would feel it's right to kick those 8 buddies off.  I think this website is a place for people who watch or listen to the show can go to interact online, that's why a conservative like KenTX still belongs here and is not a pure troll - he is a TYT fan, even if his politics are a nuisance minority here.

David

by yturks on 08/18/2008 09:14:41 AM EST


and I was disappointed to hear a replay. I wanted Cenk's perspective on the Saddleback Debate. Are you guys back in Kentucky looking for moonshine and toothless women again?

I'm trying to update the forum with numerous reports from the media on the debate. There is no doubt that McCain won and Obama lost.

As for my opinion, I've admitted that I was surprised. I didn't realize McCain was this good, and Obama was this bad.

Maybe the Obama Team is simply setting up low expectations for the October debates? Maybe he will bring out his best stuff in October?

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 09:25:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Well, the show that XM plays on Monday morning is recorded Friday night. So there was no way the weekend pow wow with Rick Warren would have been discussed.  And in this case, the Monday XM show was recorded Thursday night. The Young Turks will be back tonight, Monday night.

David

by yturks on 08/18/2008 09:32:09 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Other posts notwithstanding, I thought Ken provided several accurate links and statements to support his claim on this thread...To say he doesn't "say" anything is absurd. Ken provides a service here at TYT - without him and a few others, this place would look like something out of Caligula's wet dreams - Liberals fawning over themselves and their so called astuteness - the Stepford Wives would blush at the kool aid consumption represented here in the Liberal TYT Blogosphere! Keep up the good work Ken - somebody has to provide some counterpoint to some of these twits! :)

by bobo1 on 08/18/2008 09:31:09 AM EST

[ Parent ]

ithe service is quite poor. I would appreciate a strong, intelligent conservative voice on this site, but KenTX doesn't provide that. His posts are uncritical apings of Republican talking points, punctuated by vulgarities (Obama was sodomized) quasi-racist elements (Obama smoked crack), and factual inaccuracies (US was involved in Bosnia because of the Lewinsky affair).

If you guys know of thoughtful conservatives, by all means, bring them here. But don't go around thinking that you are dismissed because you offer views which vary from the majority here. You are dismissed because of the intellectual poverty you exhibit.

by Tullius on 08/18/2008 03:39:50 PM EST

[ Parent ]
pure poetry

by whoosh on 08/18/2008 06:03:12 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I think KenTX does say plenty overall. I am referring only to his initial post in this thread, in which he says very little and mostly provides links. Anyway, I'm annoyed to be spending so much time discussing this, and I feel bad every time I feed the troll, but others who object to the troll more than I do feed him much more than I do.

David

by yturks on 08/18/2008 09:34:32 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I know in my objection to KenTX's post I wrote "these posts" but I should have written "this post and others like it".

David

by yturks on 08/18/2008 09:36:57 AM EST

[ Parent ]
We can compare John McCain answers and Barack Obama answers side by side. The results speak for themselves. The crowd went wild over McCain. I think he will carry the Saddleback congressional district.

Barack Obama
John McCain

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 09:43:52 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I really don't know how much crack Obama smoked.
It could have been a lot, or he could have been a moderate crack smoker. He might have smoked less than three rocks per day.

(I learned this technique from Cenk on Friday, when he advised claiming that John McCain has 11 mansions.)

Elbow.
From.
The.
Sky.

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 09:47:57 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Since Obama smoked no crack (that there is any evidence of) this is stupid.  So you say Obama smoked three rocks a day, we aren't forced to say, "No it was only two."

We get to say, "What the fuck, you race baiting libelous lying sack of shit.  You have no reason at all to accuse Obama of crack smoking."

Now try that with the house argument.  See how they are different? 

by ProfRich on 08/18/2008 05:39:31 PM EST

[ Parent ]
like. It's pretty presumptuous of you to be grousing about freedom of speech and differing viewpoints when no such right exists in "private" media or on Fox "News".

Thats the point. You assume these sites and this site in particular are here for the purpose of presenting your viewpoint.

This site is here to present whatever viewpoint the ownwer decides to present. Thats the rules you guys wanted with whining about the Fairness Doctrine and allowing consolidation of media ownwership.

Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander...

Also  terminology like : "Caligula's wet dreams - Liberals fawning over themselves and their so called astuteness" - the Stepford Wives would blush at the kool aid consumption represented here in the Liberal TYT Blogosphere! provide some counterpoint to some of these twits! :)" is hardly conclusive to dialog.  

Regardless...even if it is. if that's what Cenk and company want and the users prefer, you have no right to complain. Its a big internet's out there Im sure you can find a home. However Cenk and Dave and most of the TYT community are much more tolerant of "conservatives". You should thank them instead of bitching.

Try presenting anything but a conservative "ditto" on Limbaugh and see where it gets you.

by MRFred on 08/18/2008 11:28:31 AM EST

[ Parent ]
but there is a reason that Dave and Cenk allow open debate in the forum: It's good for business.

More and more, whenever I google on political issues, I get hits for the TYT forum!

That means that thousands of other people are getting the same TYT hits.

That means that thousands of people are being introduced to TYT, via the forum portal. The forum drags them in, and they wind up watching Cenk on the screen.

The forum would be boring as hell if we didn't have open debate.

(I will be the first to admit that personal attacks detract from the free exchange of ideas, and should be reduced and hopefully eliminated.)

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 11:38:53 AM EST

[ Parent ]
You and I might be semi-famous someday.

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 11:45:52 AM EST

[ Parent ]
No thanks...I don't think crotch shots of us getting out of cars will sell many tabloids.

by MRFred on 08/18/2008 11:47:43 AM EST

[ Parent ]

 

That was "Right, said Fred" Get your defunct music groups straight, young lady!

by MedfordTim on 08/18/2008 01:27:55 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I am horrible with music.  I even like Chinese opera.

by desertpear on 08/18/2008 07:58:10 PM EST

[ Parent ]

You are probably a republican pussy that has never seen military action. I ignore people who are "Chickenshit".... .. I mean chickenhawks.

IGNORE 

by psyche2 on 08/18/2008 07:03:00 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"My objection to these posts by KenTX aren't that they are anti-Obama, but that he just says over and over that Obama got his ass kicked and posts a bunch of links, but doesn't write anything of his own."

I can’t simply post my opinions like other participants, unless I want to be deluged with criticism from a couple of dozen well coordinated attacks.

I have to choose my wording carefully, and use a minimum of words to communicate the idea. I have to link every assertion with references in order to prove that I’m correct. If I don’t prove my point upfront, I'm forced to provide 6-8 rebuttals from the subsequent attacks.

I’ve learned that YouTube links are more effective than print media links, because my opponents can’t parse words, torture text, and take phrasing out of context when the link is a video.


At this point, you should be feeling very sorry for me.

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 10:28:10 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I can't simply post my opinions like other participants, unless I want to be deluged with criticism from a couple of dozen well coordinated attacks.

Why not? If your right the argument should stand on its own merits vice how many time you can repeat the same one liner and inflammatory buzzword or repost the same material, even when refuted , over and over and over and over. You write to generate the maximum responses...good or bad...admit it.


I'm forced to provide 6-8 rebuttals from the subsequent attacks.

Why? See point 1. You said that you choose this life as it were and you are complaining you have to defend yourself? What did you expect?

What is the goal of your participation;
-to express an opinion or
-bludgeon bloggers with some witticism or insult
-recruit new Republicans
-spam TYT with RNC talking points?

by MRFred on 08/18/2008 11:45:05 AM EST

[ Parent ]

My objective is to sway the masses. 

So, by your own standards, aren't you doing rather poorly?  From what you've shown us here, with your inflammatory language and your misplaced smugness, you couldn't sway a rotten dandelion in a tornado.

by OneHitKill on 08/18/2008 01:16:45 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Your to fucking caustic to sway anything kotex

by psyche2 on 08/18/2008 07:04:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]
is between your legs

by desertpear on 08/18/2008 07:59:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
That's one of the things I like most about you.

by KenTX on 08/19/2008 12:46:46 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Here is yet another cliche; ("...to sway the masses,") yet another example of what MRfred is talking about.   You are only here because you're ego is boosted by the '...many responses I get, to which I must defend. '

You're here because of the commonplace of your sayings, which are so overdone on righty sites that you wouldn't get any responses "over there."  So, you have this bright idea for yourself alone.  "I'll join a liberal site and pretend I'm brilliant with my Limbaughisms and, nobody will know the difference and, I'll get many responses for my brilliance."  If anyone objects, you'll point out that the site doesn't want opposing views.  Much like Limbaugh.

You're here for selfishness alone.  Everything you write points to that.  For some odd reason you believe a lib site offers you a place for selfish notoriety.  

I could have written about your focus on "sodomy."  That's silly.  Is that stuff on your mind, or did you write it for "many responses?" 

by Lennilenape on 08/19/2008 01:09:16 AM EST

[ Parent ]
And the news is not good for Barack Obama. Liberal and conservative pundits agree unanimously that John McCain beat the living hell out of Barack Obama.

The only way Barack Obama can be president is if we can invent a device that rolls a teleprompter in front of him everywhere he goes.

Here are a few examples:
“McCain outshone Obama in defining and achieving his objective. At Saddleback, McCain won the media game hands down: exceeding expectations, generating pithier sound bites, delivering folksier anecdotes, cracking more jokes, and detonating more applause lines. McCain's superior sense of showmanship could prove important in a debate, not just to journalists but to audiences as well. McCain displayed another skill of enormous value: seizing his opportunities on live TV.”
 
“John McCain looked too perfect. This could only be the result of blatant cheating.”

“It is now clear why Barack Obama has refused John McCain's offer of joint town hall appearances during the fall campaign. McCain is obviously better at them. What took place instead under Warren's precise and revealing questioning was the most important event so far of the 2008 campaign -- a performance every voter should seek out on the Internet and watch.”

“Barack Obama embarrassed the entire Democratic Party. We are doomed! Now we’re going to be sucking Republican dick for another four years!”

“McCain clearly won Saddleback. In an unusual setting, his experience overwhelmed Obama.”

by KenTX on 08/19/2008 01:43:13 AM EST

[ Parent ]

that's great Ken.

Now the real question is what do you think the Nielson ratings were on that one? No one who matters in this election even knows what happened.

The real debates are coming up on the big 3 and that is what will matter.

Ohh, Ken and his Limbaugh pull toy brethren watched it on you tube. Big deal.

F'n moron. 

by z1p101 on 08/19/2008 02:26:19 AM EST

[ Parent ]
"Now the real question is what do you think the Nielson ratings were on that one? No one who matters in this election even knows what happened."

Everybody in this forum knows what happened because I force fed you with a fucking funnel.

Everybody who watches cable news knows what happened thanks to MSNBC, CNN, and Fox.

August is a slow news month, and everyone who will vote in November heard that Barack Obama melted without his trusty teleprompter.

by KenTX on 08/19/2008 02:32:05 AM EST

[ Parent ]

WTF

"Everybody in this forum knows what happened because I force fed you with a fucking funnel."

What is there? Less than 100 of us who read this regularly? Everyone else here is watching the net broadcast. Well it was a good thing you worked your fingers to the bone on this one.

"Everybody who watches cable news knows what happened thanks to MSNBC, CNN, and Fox."

You forgot C Span and some Christian network no one has ever heard of. Still a small percentage of the country.

Point is that anyone who saw any of this has already made up their minds. The "drive by media" will be running things for now on for the masses.

Is that a good or bad thing for Obama? Who knows? 

by z1p101 on 08/19/2008 02:42:34 AM EST

[ Parent ]

I don't know what happened.

I know McCain cheated and spewed his stump speech.  I know he is lying about the preferential treatment he got.

I know Obama was "thoughtful."

Honestly, that is the coverage I have seen.

I saw some of a really childish video with Obama photoshopped as a terrorists a lot.  I read Chuck Todd say basically Obama gave better answers but the Jesus freaks preferred McCain.

That is all I got. 

by ProfRich on 08/19/2008 09:54:14 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I'm curious what the viewership was. 

by desertpear on 08/19/2008 02:31:46 AM EST

[ Parent ]
every other earthquake that shatters the media for 24 hours until the next earthquake.  There are a group of us paying attention to everything, but not everyone.  Every evangelical, I'm sure.

by desertpear on 08/19/2008 02:45:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]

because everyone reads Anderson Cooper's blog. Trust me Ken, if you ask the bulk of America about Saddleback they will say "That's that gay cowboy movie, right?".

F'n dope. 

by z1p101 on 08/19/2008 02:47:38 AM EST

[ Parent ]
People at my office today were so abuzz about it that they couldn't even bring themselves to mention it, but they were definitely giving it some serious thought.  You could just tell.  It was clearly quite earth shattering.

by Spencer on 08/19/2008 02:54:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]
"purpose driven" as they say...

by desertpear on 08/19/2008 03:45:56 AM EST

[ Parent ]

we have the first three day rolling average poll since the "conversation".

Obama gained a point in Rasmussen!
Will update you when we get the Gallup daily.

Congrats on winning the pundit war.  Now lets see hwo it palyed with the voters.

by ProfRich on 08/19/2008 10:00:11 AM EST

[ Parent ]
"Will update you when we get the Gallup daily. Congrats on winning the pundit war.  Now lets see hwo it palyed with the voters."

Here is the Gallup tracking.

gallup
Meanwhile, the LA Times Bloomberg Poll is reporting a 12 point drop for Barack Obama.

Of course, history shows Obama should get a 12 point convention bounce, but those are fleeting. Ask President John F. Kerry.

by KenTX on 08/20/2008 05:36:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]

You declared a crushing victory for McCain on his home turf of Brokeback Mountain or whatever.  You called it a "political earthquake."  I pointed out Obama had gained a point in Rasmussen since the event.

So your response is that Obama gained a point in Gallup also?

I was showing you that McCain cheating his way to a Ken deklared victory Saturday night hadn't meant shit.  In fact, if there was a winner according to voters it was Obama by a small margin.  So you say, "No, Rich!  Look at this data that shows Obama winning the last three days by a small margin!"

Do you even know which side you are on anymore?

Ken, you've lost it.  You need to take some time off or something.

by ProfRich on 08/20/2008 07:07:53 AM EST

[ Parent ]
This is called the Saddleback Bounce!

You want ketchup, or are you gonna eat this thing plain?

Keep talkin your smack.

by KenTX on 08/20/2008 04:05:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]
He's been as quiet as a tiny little church mouse.

Bad news makes him depressed and sullen.

Saddleback Meltdown

National Poll Meltdown

"Least of my brothers" Meltdown

by KenTX on 08/20/2008 05:37:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Right now its a serious outlier.  But it is cause for concern.

The rest of this is pretty much nonsense.

by ProfRich on 08/20/2008 09:54:29 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Yeah, Ken we have secret strategy meetings.  Me, tom and haz fly out to Medford, Oregon and plan our response to each post.

Paranoid much?

Well, at least you are consistent with the deranged delusions of grandeur.

by ProfRich on 08/18/2008 05:41:10 PM EST

[ Parent ]
He repeatedly says so, as pointed out by a recent blog.

Hence the typical propaganda technique of repetition, presenting facts selectively ( lying by omission) to encourage a particular conclusion, posting "loaded" or misleading messages in order to produce an emotional response rather than a rational reaction to the information presented.

The desired result is "a change of the cognitive narrative of the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda".

by MRFred on 08/18/2008 10:52:57 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Some of us are more honest about it than others.

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 11:00:19 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Which of the following people are propagandists?

James "Snake Head" Carville,
Paul Begala
Terry "The Punk" McAuliffe
Howard Wolfson
Anne "The Man" Lewis
Harold "Yucky&quo t; Ickes
Dee Dee Dee Dee Myers
Lanny Davis
Sid Vicious Blumenthal
Robert "Tunnel Rat" Reich

The answer is all of the above. I watched these people kick our ass for eight years, and I decided that we must become better at the propaganda game than they are. 

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 11:17:58 AM EST

[ Parent ]

I keep waiting for him to say, "The Statue of Liberty ist kaput," but he hardly ever does.

by OneHitKill on 08/18/2008 12:57:46 PM EST

[ Parent ]

When I say we don't want Ken banned.

Kozlo seems to be the issue. 

by ProfRich on 08/18/2008 05:35:49 PM EST

[ Parent ]
a conservative Brian Fellows. You know, the SNL character created by Tracy Morgan that blurts out "I'm BRIAN FELLOWS!!" at odd and uncomfortable intervals while his guests are trying to speak. I never understood that skit until now.

by hazmat on 08/18/2008 05:44:50 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You put up this post and act as if McCain just went back in time and saved Custer.  Saddleback has routinely voted conservative, so, of course, McCain will do better than Obama.  I don't think McCain would do that well with more liberal leaning groups but you won't see me putting up a half dozen links on how Obama beat the pants off McCain.

Let's just get tp the general election, when the audience does not have significant leanings either way.  Calm down.  It really hasn't begun yet...

"Like lipstick on a pig"

by TJD on 08/18/2008 11:57:51 AM EST


I'll respond.... I don't understand why the BO campaign seems to have such an obsession with religion.  Even McLame doesn't talk about his own religion (because it's unlikely that he believes in God.)  I wonder if all of this LOOK AT ME I LOVE TEH JESUS is really going to make anyone want to vote for Obama any more.  These people know who butters their bread--as long as the Republicans don't attempt to tax any megachurches and keep the debate about gay marriage and abortion alive, they are happy.  There's nothing a reasoned person like Obama can do to sway them over. 

by schmoab on 08/18/2008 12:22:24 PM EST

[ Parent ]

The idea that evangelical christians are a monolithic group of haters is wrong. About 30% of them vote reliably Democratic in every election. They are such a large demographic that swaying them a few percentage points can make a big difference. Karl Rove understood this. By most accounts, Barack Obama is seen as genuine in his expressions of Faith, and McCain is seen as a faker. He's going to win some votes with that cross in the dirt story, but its all he has to offer the faithful. Barack's answers on questions of faith were a hundred times better than mccain's. This isn't completely lost on that crowd. All of Ken's crowing about the loudness of the cheering is not going to diminish the real gains of the evening, which was to get our guy in front of historically republican crowd and make some inroads. I stand by my earlier postings that this was a good debate and Saddleback Church should be commended for raising the tone of the campaign.

by hazmat on 08/18/2008 12:45:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The small segment of "evangelicals" you refer to are black people. You've probably never even met a born again fundamentalist. That crowd noise was the sound of Democrat-haters.

by KenTX on 08/18/2008 02:09:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]

My entire extended family is republican, and Christian. A few of them are evangelical. I have met them.

 That crowd noise was the sound of Democrat-haters.

You may be right about that. Since democrats like myself are blueblooded americans, they are also america-haters, like you.

by hazmat on 08/18/2008 03:10:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I have met so-called "born-agains."&nb sp; But, you're not arguing that, you're easing in the sleaze with, "The small segment ...are black people." And, "That crowd noise was ...Democrat-haters."

Easing in your racial slant while raising the specter of hate.  Why must the crowd only be screaming hate in your eyes?

by Lennilenape on 08/19/2008 01:45:09 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Evangelicals have begun to abandon the Republican party, even if they haven't completely accepted the Dems yet.  War tends to turn off Christians of most stripes, because....hey, real live BORN innocent people die in war...by the hundreds of thousands. 

McCain doesn't have long to live, so the prospect of another war just gives him a hard on.  

"According to a September 2007 survey by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, 15 percent of white evangelicals between 18 and 29, a group traditionally a shoo-in for the GOP, say they no longer identify with the Republican Party. Older evangelicals are also questioning their traditional allegiance, but not at the same rate."

I love the comments from evangelical blogs:

"I have been amazed at the number of younger evangelicals (early career and college) that are flocking to Obama. He has the mark of cain and is proud of it, yet that seems not to matter to them. It breaks my heart to see them blindly dance to his tune while millions of babies are murdered . God have mercy on us."

Another:

"So before you write off all evangelicals who might support Obama as naive or un-biblical, realize there might be others issues as stake which also God cares about and have to do with the well being of humans (poverty, environmentalism, health care, education)."

And another:

"One specific factor pushing me towards Obama is the absolutely hateful things I am reading from my fellow conservative, Reformed and evangelical brothers and sisters. I’m all for hating the sin, but it sure seems to me like many of us hate the sinner, too. I believe that’s wrong."

I love these comments.  Many of the commenters are nearly illiterate, unfortunately.  Try reading one of those comment sections sometime if you want a belly laugh.

by desertpear on 08/18/2008 08:33:11 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Was there ever an expectation that Obama would "win" over an audience of Evangelical Christian Right Wingers? Don't think so. He was there to talk to them. He had no expectations of winning over the whole crowd.

He did what he went there to do. Answer questions. And without benefit of knowing the questions ahead of time like McCain.

Or, so I heard. The LAST thing I want to watch is two hours of some idiotic preacher asking the stupidest questions possible. When is the athiest Q&A going to be presented? The one which never asks a candidate what special place the flying spaghetti monster holds in their life. I had even less interest in watching this than the Olympics.

That's okay, Ken. Take your little "victories" where you can find them. Doesn't matter. The only "win" that counts is the 48 states Obama is going to take in November.

 

by MedfordTim on 08/18/2008 01:23:32 PM EST


We Pastafarian's are proud of our faith, and has way more delicious church snacks.

by whoosh on 08/18/2008 06:51:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]
that was funny.

by hazmat on 08/18/2008 03:02:41 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Kens self admitted over the top propaganda and graveyard bravado aside. Many evangelicals said they where impressed with Obama.

That's not the point.

Bush "won' in 2000 with about 60% of the evangelical vote. Prior to the election the numbers where something like 52% Bush 30% Gore, 18% undecided. He polled 57% when it was all said and done. He pulled 62% in 2004. Those voters constituted  a full 35% of his total vote count in 2000 a bit higher in 2004.

Obama's target isn't very high. All he needs to do is shave off 3 or 4 points in the undecided evangelical voters.

If that happens...McCain , who isn't popular with them anyway, regardless of the post Forum spin, is toast. This little faux pas..will not help:

Top social conservative leaders in key battleground states are urging John McCain not to pick a running mate who supports abortion rights, warning of dire consequences from a Republican base already unenthused about their nominee.

McCain's comments Wednesday to the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes that former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge's pro-abortion rights views wouldn't necessarily rule him out

by MRFred on 08/18/2008 04:38:46 PM EST


Ignore bigots

by psyche2 on 08/18/2008 06:55:00 PM EST


Come on Dave, lets be a little proactive here...this guy is spamming the site with "Truth"..many are repetitious and unproductive posts.

by MRFred on 08/18/2008 07:01:08 PM EST


I hate having this bullshit floating out there with no response.

by Spencer on 08/18/2008 07:21:34 PM EST

[ Parent ]
What part of this did you not understand beside the Iraq War...Pastor Rick will interview each candidate separately for one hour on topics of compassion, leadership, and faith. This is not a debate, but a discussion...Obama won the conversation.

by army193 on 08/19/2008 12:19:00 AM EST


So very right on army.  No one else has pointed that out yet.  There was no debate!

by Lennilenape on 08/19/2008 01:55:51 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: