The 110th Dem Congress was getting blamed for high gas prices, but they've been dropping

 It occurred to me that gas prices had gone down a bit over the last several weeks. I saw the price of $3.59 per gal earlier today.

 When gas was above four dollars a gallon I was hearing a bunch of ridiculous hype that it was the fault of the Congress and that of the Democrat Majority, which being informed, I know is not a full majority. (like it will be after the election)

I thought it would be smart to bring this topic back to the media.

 I want to know if the Republicans are singing praises to the Democrat Majority in Congress for the lower prices?

 

 The way their thinking was on the blame, it stands to reason they either acknowledge the high prices we had were not the fault of the Democrat controlled Congress or they need to be bragging about what Democrats have done to bring down prices.

 Just something to think about and to give back to the Neocons.

< McCain Alzheimer's Check | What Does "Change" Really Mean? >
 Display:
the support for investing in new offshore drilling projects goes....bye bye!!

by desertpear on 08/20/2008 03:29:25 AM EST

It's all so complex and yet it can be summed up in one sentence:  We consume way too much fossil energy, we waste half of it, we cannot possibly produce enough here to satisfy the demand, and no current government leader is seriously trying to change our energy bad habits.  To assign blame we have to point all ten fingers at all points of the compass, reserving at least one for ourselves.

by bfaul on 08/20/2008 09:56:38 AM EST

The WASTE is a good place to start.  Conservation is the cheapest source of energy and doesn't even have to be painful.  Look at the way our current food system is, with people eating things from halfway across the planet that have to be flown and shipped and trucked.  What we have is unsustainable, so even if we drill or develop new energy sources, we have to look at changing some of the ways we have done things when oil was cheap.

by desertpear on 08/20/2008 01:57:06 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Exactly, but conservation is an issue of personal responsibility, that is why the R's belittled it.  They don't believe in any form of accountability or responsibility.  Not for Scooter, not for the DoJ, and especially not for those in the big gas hogs--  BUY MORE!

by NicoloM on 08/20/2008 02:24:37 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Early on in the Bush administration Ari Fleisher was completely honest about what they were going to do to encourage Americans to change their lifestyle to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels: 

"Asked whether the president was considering a campaign urging Americans to change their lifestyles and conserve gasoline, Fleischer replied: "That's a big no. The president believes that it's an American way of life, and that it should be the goal of policymakers to protect the American way of life. The American way of life is a blessed one."

The statement above more than any other explains why gas prices are so high today.  They've made no effort of any kind to reduce usage, not one single useful thing.  It's been given no priority at all.  These people have failed to anticipate every single crisis they've ever had to deal with, no matter how much warning they were given.

If you parse that statement carefully, what you realize is that it is an argument in favor of selfishness.  It says that the American people are selfish, that selfishness is an American way of life, that it ought to be, and that this administration applauds the fact that it is, and promises never to ask them to change.  They've lived up to that promise.  What it doesn't do is provide a plan for the pigs to follow when the trough is finally empty.  That would be "hard work", something this president never likes to contemplate.

by bfaul on 08/20/2008 02:29:54 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I was around for the first "gas crisis."  Only change is that the people in the oil business are even more filthy rich enough to buy politicians outright, both democrats and republicans.

by desertpear on 08/21/2008 02:32:28 AM EST

[ Parent ]
How supply and demand have changed in the last month and how the possibility there might be some offshore drilling that will produce in 2030 has brought down oil prices?

by ProfRich on 08/20/2008 01:36:14 PM EST

The projected increase in production will reach about 3% of overall production, which isn't alot. Furthermore prices are not set in the US but internationally. It will have a small effect on price though.
Its been calculated to decrease the price 0.106$/barrel tomorrow if the bill passed. (source).
The unregulated speculation is estimated to be responsible for 10-25% of the price. if we are talking about 4$/gallon thats between 40 cents and 1$ at the pump.
So basically republicans are full of s....

by whoosh on 08/20/2008 05:56:56 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The piece I referenced is written by Menzie Chinn,
Professor of Public Affairs and Economics at University of Wisconsin

by whoosh on 08/20/2008 06:17:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I think the speculators are reacting to the apparent end of the war with Iraq and a massive scaling back of tension with Iran.

by ProfRich on 08/20/2008 09:59:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Good for you--
Demand that the oil mafia drill within three months or lose all leases-- DRILL NOW. 
If they want to drill in the US the oil must be sold and consumed only in the US-- DRILL HERE. 
And if they want to drill offshore, all shareholders must be personally responsible for any damage-- if it really isn't a possibility it should be no problem.
Make that your reptillian chant--
Ford is better at something than any vehicle in its class! Tide does clean better!
I only wish I could fit this into an advertising slogan-- BushCo escalated its threats to attack Iran which would have shut down the straits of Hormuz, hence the speculation that a vast supply of oil supply interrupted would drive up the price, and after Obama embarassed BushCo about talking to the Iranians,  BushCo had to start negotiating with Iran, the price went down, because oil speculators may not know BushCo is fairly inept and likely to fail in its negotiations.
Nah, its gotta be Pelosi!  Crest makes my teeth whiter!

by NicoloM on 08/20/2008 02:20:36 PM EST

"We have been talking about our energy problems for 30 years,and John McCain has been in Washington for 26 years. It is now time for someone, Sen. Obama, to put the interest of the country ahead of oil."

 

"[McCain] continues to reject bipartisan compromise because it would roll back massive tax breaks for the oil companies," he said. "That is not putting the country first, it is putting the interest of oil companies first."

 

by Lib on 08/20/2008 03:24:13 PM EST

::points at genitals::

by Spencer on 08/20/2008 06:40:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: