Obama is micro-managing the convention

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
As reported on TheHill.com the Obama campaign has taken over the convention with a grip every bit as tight as Kerry did in 2004. This does not bode well for the Democratic Party. 

Putting the inspiring Kucinich into sub-prime time, and giving the uninspiring corporate spokesman Mark Warner the keynote address shows the low note that the Obama campaign is playing, and the note sounds pretty sour too.


The Obama campaign is micro-managing and controlling the convention just like Kerry did in 2004 and they are driving the party into the same ditch.

Betsy Rothstein at TheHill Opens her report with

Obama tightens grip on podium speeches
Written by Betsy Rothstein

DENVER — Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) is tightening the reins on campaign speeches and stressing that speakers emphasize a rags-to-riches theme.

Members of Congress and others who have been asked to address the convention must have their speeches approved by the Obama campaign. In many cases, the speeches are drastically changed — to the point where the original speech is completely scrapped, Democratic sources say.

This kind of propaganda management of the convention drains the life out of it. It is no wonder that most of the speeches are so poor.

The leadership of the Democratic Party needs to learn some day that its vitality is in the free voices of the people, not in the scripted advertising of political professionals. If Candidate Obama won't let the authentic voices of his own Party speak, people had better get prepared now for the same or worse treatment from President Obama. Folks, people don't change when they get to the White House, they become more tight in their control, not less.


Rothstein also reports on the Obama tampering and censorship with Kucinich's speech:

Yet not every speech has been completely overhauled. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), who was asked by Obama to speak about the economy, was scheduled to deliver his speech Tuesday afternoon. The Obama campaign struck just one line from his speech, which slammed the Republicans and the Bush administration, according to a Democratic source.

That line, addressing Republicans, read: "They’re asking for another four years — in a just world, they’d get 10 to 20."

Too bad that was censored. I bet it would have brought the roof down.

Not only was Kucinich censored, it appears that the Israel lobby got to Obama and convinced Obama to give Carter the hook.   As Democracy Now! reports Jimmy Carter was a scheduled speaker but his spot to give a live speech was yanked at the last minute and only a prerecorded video was played followed by him coming on stage for a 90 second hand wave.  
http://www.democracynow.org /2008/8/27/fmr_president_ji mmy_carter_sidelined_at

This type of tight control of the convention is what has made the conventions a silly sham and nothing more than a propaganda play every bit a sign of American fascism as Hitler's Nuremberg rallies were evidence of German fascism.

< Hillary Haters Need to Shut The Fuck Up Now... | Carville was wearing Pumas, what a douche! >
 Display:
Sounds like Obama is just a Nazi.  Who are you?

by schmoab on 08/27/2008 01:37:49 PM EST


One could argue strongly that past Republican success was due to this very same type of control and that Democrats have failed so frequently becasue of their lack of unity on speaking points.

When Warner spoke I thought, "Oh I see why Obama chose this guy, he thinks just like him." But, maybe he doesn't, maybe Obama (and his peeps) wrote it for him. 

 Having made the above point, I would also like people to speak their own truth as Kucinich did (absent the one line).

So what is the real answer? Did Kerry lose becasue he held a tight grip on the convention? Personally I don't believe he lost, I still contend that the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen and I fear for this year's election as well - private corps counting our votes? Really?

 So Obama is creating a clear message of unity. Something that has been missing from the Dem voice for some time. I think we can only judge this convention in retrospect once the election is over.

The other thing that concerns me is that the Repub convention comes after this one. That will leave a more lasting impression in people's minds. As Orwell wrote in Animal Farm, the last pig to speak wins the vote; or something to that effect.

 

 

 

by Andrew Koenig on 08/27/2008 02:27:35 PM EST


Apparently even on MSNBC, which is supposedly "leftwing" they only covered 2 mins of Kerry's speach, which had alot of the power that a lot of progressive were asking for.

As long as conglomerate media corporations is supplying the news, the are american people are loosing.

 

PS: I loved Dennis Kucenich's speach, very cool. What all this about him supposedly looking weird?? To me he just looked like a normal person, that you can run into in anywhere. 

by whoosh on 08/28/2008 03:10:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]

But I can't sit quietly and suffer anymore.

This is an epidemic here at TYT but the -ing from of "to lose" is losing not loosing.

I would ignore this but there are about 12 posters who do this about 30 times a day.  Sorry it had to be you, whoosh, who got called out.

Again, I feel like an asshole but hopefully I can be a pariah for a bit and the TYT world will be better for a long time.

by ProfRich on 08/28/2008 05:07:14 PM EST

[ Parent ]

and I'm guilty of doing this once (I typed "loose" instead of "lose", though I'm pretty sure it was just a typo), so I would like to apologize to everyone involved, as well as the families of everyone involved.  Feel free to ignore everything I post from here on out.

But from what I saw, this doesn't really seem to be that prevalent.  I have noticed that a lot of people can't seem to spell the word "hypocrite" correctly (I usually see "hypocrit").

The new version of Firefox comes with the Spell-check built in.  Rejoice!

What's this thread about again?  Oh, right...  Sorry.

by Spencer on 08/28/2008 05:25:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: