John McCain Thinks You're an Idiot

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
       By Jayar Jackson

After a historic week at the Democratic National Convention, capped off with a historic speech by Barack Obama accepting the Party's nomination before a crowd of 84,000, it's apparent that John McCain's campaign was left in awe like many other Americans.  His choice of Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin as his VP running mate screams of desperation and pandering to any possible voters left that he can draw from the Democratic primary battle between Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Even though the DNC completely dispelled all the dramatic efforts some journalists and the McCain campaign had in saying it was a Party divided, the 72 year old Senator from Arizona has completely jumped off the edge in chasing his dream of becoming President.  

Since many Americans are now understanding that John McCain is handcuffed by his promises to big oil companies, lobbyists, and the Christian Right's radical freedom-suppressing views, he began the general election with a very negative campaign that only grasped two very unsubstantial attacks against Barack Obama.  He is too popular, and therefore a celebrity and secondly, he is too inexperienced to become President of the United States.

It's well known that one way to attack your opponent is to attack his strengths.  With ongoing attacks on Barack Obama's awesome celebrity and particularly his uncanny ability to motivate and inspire young voters, McCain has tried to make the one thing EVERY politician dreams of doing a bad thing.  How long have we been preaching that the voter that every disconnected politician can't figure out is the young voter?  Celebrities have been trying to get in on the act to motivate young voters for decades with programs like Rock The Vote, but the magic was so difficult to discover, everyone virtually gave up on them.  McCain's declaration that there's something wrong with excitement and hope behind a politician came off more like a jealous contender that wished he had the "it" factor Barack Obama has.  Young, motivated voters only turned their back on him more, so inexperience was next up to bat.

Constant spotlights on Obama's time in the Senate probably caught a few people's attention when it was coupled with scare tactics that the Republican Party has turned into an art form.  "Is he ready to lead?"  "Where is his foreign policy experience?"  The fact that President Bush and VP Cheney currently have the most experience in the White House and still managed to destroy the economy, dismantle our image with the rest of the world, and subvert Americans' civil rights didn't seem to matter to some.  The obvious asset of judgment has been squarely in the hands of Barack Obama, as it has been pointed out that John McCain's judgment has mirrored George Bush's in his voting record.

So now that John McCain is down by 24 points and the awesome event put on at the Democratic National Convention has him looking at 4th down, he's getting desperate and throwing up Hail Maries at the beginning of the 3rd quarter before this game gets out of reach.

The last straw McCain's grasping at is the determined Hillary Clinton supporters that came to the convention looking to propel their candidate even with the Mission Impossible theme playing in the background.  His nomination of Sarah Palin is easier to read than Dr. Seuss.  The insular thought is that all women only wanted to see Hillary Clinton in office because she would be the first female president.  He has no idea that they liked her policies, trusted her judgment, and admired her strength.  McCain's campaign thought, "Hillary Clinton is a WOMAN, and everyone that voted for her MUST ALL BE WOMEN!!  Women are so irrational and emotional, let's just throw some woman in here and their ovaries will MAKE them vote for us!!"

This is so desperate, the McCain campaign forgot about their previous assertions that Barack Obama shouldn't be elected due to his lack of experience.  Sarah Palin has NEVER had national experience and has held her Alaskan post for under 2 years.  All the people that were worried about that big, bad, experience monster should be jumping under the covers and turning on their night lights when they see Palin crawling under their beds.

As long as Americans don't prove John McCain right in his thoughts that we are all idiots, with women at the bottom of the intelligence pool, this last ditch effort to take attention away from his horrible policies that will continue to hurt America will fall to the ground.  Will we choose our next president based on unrelated tricks or real issues that actually affect our lives and the world?  Are YOU an idiot??

< Special Coverage of the Republican National Convention Starting Monday | Young Turks in St. Paul for Republican Convention >
 Display:

I was quite centered on the fence between Obama and Hillary right up until I walked into the booth back in the Primaries, and if gender influenced me a little I can assure you it was not a deciding factor. 

My inititial position was pretty much anti-hillary, woman or no. Sure, I wanted to see a woman in the white House, but I had an image of her as being too in bed with corprorate America. I loved Barack Obama but felt he was running prematurely and would make a great VP. And so it was Edwards for me. But by the time I got to cast my vote he had been eliminated and both Hillary and Obama had won me over on different points. In the end I picked her because of her experience, and because I thought she had a solid plan for healthcare reform, and maybe a little bit because she has a va-jay-jay. 

Let me go out on a limb here and say that in my view, people are much much more inclined to vote on race than on gender. Any woman who's had to associate with other women knows that there is a major amount of catiness and jealousy that goes on between women. We don't always side with each other. In fact, this thing may backfire for McCain because women could think "I'll be damned if a beauty queen with no national experience is going to get to be the VP, especially when Hillary actually worked for it and got dissed." Female spite could very well end up biting McCain in the arse on this one. 

by duchessnoir on 08/29/2008 08:17:18 PM EST


Any true feminist will feel compelled to reward the GOP for advancing the role of women in America, and punish Democrats for what they did to Hillary. While Democrats are making bullshit academic speeches about Seneca Falls, Republicans are making serious strides to smash the glass ceiling for all time. Feminists know that a woman will be a (72 year old) heart beat away from the most powerful position in the world. The Republican base is now energized. The Denver Convention is already forgotten.

by KenTX on 08/29/2008 09:57:07 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The desperation in your post indicates you're last fingernail just let go of the tile roof you've been trying to scrabble back up and now you are in freefall ... not to worry though,  that's a real soft pile of shit waiting to embrace you far below.

by gatekeeper50 on 08/29/2008 10:12:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The 30,000 posts on Sarah Palin versus 0 posts on Barack Who?

by KenTX on 08/29/2008 10:21:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
and he can't get up.  Now, do you want boostraps, or a helping hand.

by gatekeeper50 on 08/29/2008 10:26:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Sarah Palin? Yes, I can hear the evangelicals now.  And any religious zealot will love her. If the PUMAs vote for her, they are idiots!  How could you vote for a woman who is almost anti-woman.  I mean.  What is that all about?

PUMA's act like spoiled little girls that didn't get asked to the Prom.  

by melanievox on 08/29/2008 10:29:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Asked about Palin's national security experience, Cindy McCain could not come up with anything beyond the fact that, after all, her state is right next to Russia. "You know, the experience that she comes from is, what she has done in government -- and remember that Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia."

by Lib on 08/31/2008 06:36:59 PM EST

[ Parent ]
is why McCain didn't just select Cindy as his running mate.  Oh, but like Cenk says, fresh meat is always preferable to what you are used to.  But, Cindy seems equally prepared to be VP.

by desertpear on 09/01/2008 02:13:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]

And Cindy qualified?

He sent her to clear up the whole Georgia mess!!!

Apparently, McCain thinks some drug use, a few dollars in the bank and a win, place or show finish in a beauty contest qualifies you for just about anything.

by ProfRich on 09/02/2008 12:17:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Ok, you are smart.  This was one of the best replies I've ever seen in an comments section anywhere.  Seriously...These guys are soo panic-struck and it's beautifulllll.  Nicely put, your comment.

by vaughnink on 08/31/2008 08:58:49 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I meant the above for GAtekeeper, not KentTx, of course

by vaughnink on 08/31/2008 09:02:13 PM EST

[ Parent ]
OMG.  You must be nuts.

you can't seriously believe that just because they put her on the ticket that she'll ever actually MAKE DECISIONS!? 

and this crap about "smash the glass ceiling"...

what did this woman ever do that properly prepared her to be the leader of this great nation?  it just proves that if you are in the republican party you'll get a job whether you deserve it or not (more than likely not).  HOW could she take a job like this?  should we call her Blanche DuBois? 

this is absolutely UNREAL.  Feminists should be PISSED OFF.  How many women have worked their butts off to get somewhere and this babe waltzes in thinking she deserves to be the VEEP?

"not for ourselves alone" you are a moron.




by petoix on 08/29/2008 10:22:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Because it grabbed you right where it counts, and squeezed. What qualifies Sarah Palin? Really? What in the name of FUCK qualifies Barack Obama? His dark skin? His ability to read words on a teleprompter?

by KenTX on 08/29/2008 10:40:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Your inability to answer the question about Sarah's qualifications is somewhat telling....

We've talked about Obama's qualifications for months.  Time to talk about your new pet!!

by desertpear on 08/29/2008 11:14:29 PM EST

[ Parent ]
She has executive experience running the largest state in the union. Obama has none. She promotes drilling for oil. Obama says we can't drill our way out of our problems. She supports tax cuts, and even sends $1500 cash payment to every Alaskan, rather than taxing them. Obama will implement Clinton Era tax increases.

by KenTX on 08/29/2008 11:31:52 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I LOVE that Republicans are pushing that argument. Obama has more legislative experience but Palin has more executive experience which is the only experience that counts.

Great, ok, let's run with that!

That means that Obama and McCain are TIED at 0-0 for executive experience. So reviewing the score-card we see that Obama is younger, fresher, more inspiring, has better judgment and no less experience than McCain.

Thanks Ken! 

by ihavenobias on 08/30/2008 12:36:29 AM EST

[ Parent ]
This is gonna be a fun final two months.

Obama has more years as a state senator than all of this woman's experience combined. She has about two years running the fourth smallest state in the country and nothing else. Zero years in national office. Zero years in any national security matter. I don't believe she even has a degree in law (much less knowledge of constitutional law, much less teaching it) or economics or even political science.

I don't see any comments, speeches or even just campaign messages from her where she has ever even shown any knowledge of foreign policy or national security issues. When has she been right on the consequences of a war or potential foreign policy proposal?

This is one time where an experience argument actually holds weight. She would be next in line to lead the most powerful nation on the planet. This is... crazyballs.

by Weapon X on 08/30/2008 05:06:38 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Has anyone even told Palin that she's been picked yet?  I think I remember reading that people in Alaska hibernate from August 20 through June 10.  Cripes, she'll miss both the election and the inauguration!

by OneHitKill on 08/30/2008 06:24:04 AM EST

[ Parent ]
well, if you are happy with his pick, god bless.  I am too.

by desertpear on 08/30/2008 12:37:10 AM EST

[ Parent ]
She has executive experience running the largest state in the union.

lol.  Just pure lol.

Really?  You're going with geographical AREA as your metric?  OK.  Great.

She promotes drilling for oil. Obama says we can't drill our way out of our problems.

She's promoted Obama's energy plan.  Ooooopsie doopsie!

She supports tax cuts, and even sends $1500 cash payment to every Alaskan, rather than taxing them.

Holy shit, you ARE desperate.  Did Republican Ken just paint government handouts as a GOOD thing?

Obama supports tax cuts to the middle class bigger than McCain's.  Oooooooooooopsie doopsie!

Obama will implement Clinton Era tax increases.

Clinton presided over a balanced budget and a huge economic boom.  Ken, you're going to pull a muscle if you stretch any more.

by jarett on 08/30/2008 04:40:08 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Alaska is the "largest state in the union" by land mass only. It's, what, 47th out of 50 in terms of actual population?

This asinine comment is akin to saying that being governor of Siberia would give you more executive experience than being prime minister of the U.K.

That's not the summer heat you're feeling Ken. It's teh stupid... it burns.

by Weapon X on 08/30/2008 04:46:19 AM EST

[ Parent ]
90% of the population would love this if it accompanied Clinton Era pay increases.

by Weapon X on 08/30/2008 04:48:30 AM EST

[ Parent ]
"largest state in the union"

so by that logic Siberia is vastly more important than any American state?

by that logic Canada is more important than the US, btw Canada is even bigger than China

BTW, just to give some perspective: The Netherlands have 24x the population of Alaska, France 93x, Germany 120x
and because this is TYT: Turkey has 102 times the population of Alaska on half the area, that's 10200%, wouldn't you love those returns on your investments :)

Kenny Texas has become really sad

by callisto on 08/30/2008 09:34:50 AM EST

[ Parent ]
KenTx is repeating verbatim the conservative talking points. I just saw McCain use the "largest state" line in an interview.

by Lib on 09/01/2008 02:38:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]
That would be called Bush I era tax increases. He started it ;)

by whoosh on 08/30/2008 12:21:31 PM EST

[ Parent ]
it's got a population smaller than most large cities in the United States!! There are literally 500,000 people in all of Alaska and you think that qualifies her to be responsible for 300,000,000?! She doesn't know a thing about agriculture, urban issues, natural disasters like hurricanes (seeing as Gustav is heading this way this might be an issue in terms of response), etc.  All of the things that makes up our country are not represented by Alaska and I mean no disrespect to the state but it is an outlier.

You really want to throw out Obama's "lack of experience?" Okay so 8 years in the IL State Senate and 4 years in the United States Senate is really comparable to 8 years as the Mayor of Wasilla with a population of 5500 and 1.5 years as governor? Wow how stupid are you if you buy that for a single second? How much do you hate your country if you're willing to throw it to Palin simply because you're too racist to vote for Obama? How much self-rationalization is the GOP going through to convince themselves that they actually give a shit about the United States of America??

I am so sick and tired of all of the excuses the right wingers throw at us about what we dems did wrong. We are constantly bailing the GOP out of trouble any time they come close to destroying this country. It was Roosevelt who saved us from Hoover, it was Kennedy who lead on racial issues and prevented WWIII (had it been McCain he would have tried to call their bluff and the cuban missile crisis would have turned out entirely different), it was Clinton who saved the economy after the first Bush and now the Repugs have screwed us over again and another democrat has to step in to fix this mess. You deserve the government you get unfortunately the rest of us don't deserve to pay for your mistakes.

Palin will go down in flames but we can't be afraid to challenge her. Hillary didn't pull punches and if we are supposed to treat Palin with Kiddie gloves that proves she's not up for the position.

by txaggiearcher on 08/30/2008 10:01:56 PM EST

[ Parent ]
And a Democrat?

You're family must be very ashamed of you.

I certainly am.

by KenTX on 08/31/2008 09:54:23 AM EST

[ Parent ]
If experience is important, Palin hasn't got it, so you have to hate this pick.  As everyone else has pointed out, vast tracts of tundra are not very hard to run, and there are few actual people in Alaska.

Alaskans have been getting oil money for years, that isn't her doing.  Obama has already spelled out his tax plan and it's only on the rich.  Obama is right that we cannot drill our way out of our problems.  We use 25% of the worlds oil and only have 3% within our country.  Oil is sold on the world market, just because they dig it up here doesn't mean they're going to give it to you.  Drilling in ANWAR might bring the cost of gas down a couple cents in a decade or so.

by adamandruth on 08/31/2008 12:18:23 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Alaska is the largest state in the union.  So, so very much of it pristine, rugged and untouched.  And, every American should be proud of that; every American.  And, want to keep it that way.

The Great Lakes was that way less than a century ago.  Now it's poisoned from Duluth to Potsdam (NY.)  I don't mean just a little mercury here and there along the tremendous miles of seaway.  It is poisoned with raw sewage and many, many other waste materials from carcinogens to the West Nile Virus. 

The Great Lakes and its tributaries are roughly the size of Alaska, but, it's poisoned; all of it.  Scientists want to clean it up but are afraid of what they might disturb if they start anywhere.  Near, or at Port Huron/Sarnia lies huge blobs of chemical waste of all dangerous types. 

These blobs are as large as houses -- those they know of.  These too, they don't want to start breaking down because they don't know what they may release. 

Look up the need of the Great Lakes for our survival.  Anyone who does, will find out we need the (fresh...???) water so far much more than we need to drill (hunt around) for more oil.  Of course if the Republicans ever get back in, they owe the large oil companies and other Corporate giants so much that they have to "give" them tons of tax money to drill or do anything, anywhere they wish, whenever they can get into the White House.

It's their (the republicans) sole job now, get in the White House; never mind the people or what's right, or how -- just get in there "...and pay us back," (BIG, Big Corporate America.)  

by Lennilenape on 08/31/2008 02:53:53 AM EST

[ Parent ]
The citizens of Alaska do not pay state income tax. Instead, they receive annual oil royalty checks from the State of Alaska. The people of Alaska love drilling for oil, because it creates billions of dollars in salaries for Alaskan workers, and billions of dollars in oil royalties for the State of Alaska.

The situation in Alaska is illustrative to the nation at large. We can continue sending $2 billion to foreign countries every day of the year in exchange for imported oil, or we can take control of our future. We can send trillions of dollars to foreign countries, or we can infuse the American Economy with those trillions of dollars.

We can use ANWR as a bridge to convert our energy needs to American Coal, American Uranium, American Natural Gas, American Oil.

Please join me in promoting a common sense energy policy that rejects the idiotic notions of socialist liberals. This exchange is heartening indeed. It feels like you are starting to become aware of the folly of the insane programs of Barackwheat Obama.

May God Bless you Sir, as you go forward in developing cognitive reasoning. Here is a song to inspire you as your mind expands.

by KenTX on 08/31/2008 11:50:22 AM EST

[ Parent ]
by comparing their academic credentials?

Palin: BA in journalism from U. Idaho.
Obama: BA from Columbia and JD from Harvard.  President of Harvard Law Review.

Then we can move on to how Palin has a total of less than 4 years in public service of any kind, and has zero record of community service.  There is no evidence whatsoever that she understands the needs of middle America or the poor.

Obama, by contrast, ditched the chance to get rich quick after getting his law degree and dug into the trenches as a community organizer, only running for State Senate in IL years later and finally winning his Senatorial bid against Alan "I disowned my daughter because she's gay" Keyes.  He then spent 4 dynamic years in the Senate getting a great deal done, including massive steps towards greater accountability and transparency in government, seen among other places at www.usaspending.gov.

But, but, but!  Sarah Palin was mayor of a tiny town and governor of a state consisting of 740,000 people!

Isn't UT bigger than that?

Give me a break, Ken.  Just take a deep breath and admit McCain has issued his own death knell.

by jarett on 08/30/2008 04:35:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]
But, but, but!  Sarah Palin was mayor of a tiny town and governor of a state consisting of 740,000 people!


Isn't UT bigger than that?

Bro, the suburbs of Chicago are bigger than that. Obama probably represented more people when he was a state senator, lol.

by Weapon X on 08/30/2008 04:53:03 AM EST

[ Parent ]

You completely ignored her PTA experience!

She actually brought that up in her intro speech.

by ProfRich on 08/31/2008 02:00:42 AM EST

[ Parent ]

"and punish Democrats for what they did to Hillary."

You are so full of shit you reek like the bottom of the moneky cage at the zoo.  After all of the shit you've said about Hillary you expect people to buy this diarrhea flowing from your mouth?  Goddamn but you're unbelievable.  

by bfaul on 08/29/2008 10:56:56 PM EST

[ Parent ]
What do you know about the subject? They don't even have a zoo in your little burg. Do you teach at that shit for brains "college"?

by KenTX on 08/29/2008 11:04:38 PM EST

[ Parent ]
no.

There's nothing like the sound of a Republican trying to convince himself of something.

by jarett on 08/30/2008 04:27:36 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I don't think I've laughed harder or more often on any post before thanks to Ken's comments here.

by Weapon X on 08/30/2008 04:55:07 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Any true feminist will feel compelled to reward the GOP for advancing the role of women in America

I guess that means McCain won't be getting any votes from Rush Limbaugh listeners.  Tough break.

by OneHitKill on 08/30/2008 06:02:21 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Did he really say that?  I'm laughing my ass off.  Ken, the friend of feminists everywhere, yet here he constantly disparages women for their lack of intelligence.  The GOP advances the role of women in America?  What role?  Their role as pregnant stay-at-home moms, popping out endless new consumers to buy the products sold by the corporations who buy political offices for their shills.

by desertpear on 08/30/2008 04:07:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
He just gets frustrated because it's not as socially acceptable to bully women as it is to bully men.

by OneHitKill on 08/30/2008 10:37:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
She's a Republican; we are Democrats.  That is what matters. 

by desertpear on 08/31/2008 03:26:32 AM EST

[ Parent ]

A feminist will support the GOP just because they chose a woman to put on the national ticket?

Whoa.  I guess you think all women vote exclusively via their ovaries and not about policies or social/economical issues that pertain to them.

By adding that tidbit about feminist support, you do realize that Palin is an anti-woman woman and has extremely conservative stances (anti-choice and anti-gay)? This does not represent the type of ideology that feminists flock to.

by DocZee on 08/31/2008 03:14:51 AM EST

[ Parent ]
They do not want to be slaves to pregnancy.

by desertpear on 09/01/2008 02:16:52 PM EST

[ Parent ]

We've already had a woman running for the VP slot. Perhaps some younger women will look at Palin like a shiny new penny, but younger women haven't really been the so-called problem for Obama.

As a feminist, I'm not impressed. Also, as a feminist, I can say with certainty that you are not equipped to state what any true feminist will or should be compelled to do. I know it must be hard for you, as a Republican tool, to comprehend that there are people who can think for themselves instead of sharing one little brain.

 

 

by pmdtrans on 09/01/2008 09:42:32 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Hello from across the pond! I have to say that I've been laughing all day. I'm so proud of John McBush for picking a woman - from Wa/silly/a - former beauty contestant - anti-choice (stop saying pro-life - it isn't) - gun moll and fishing expert. What could ever make us more proud to be Americans? Or women for that matter. Is it really true that she fired the man who refused to fire the state trooper who was in a custody battle with her sister? Does this get any better?

 Seriously! Give grandpa McBush a break. After all, he spent 5 years in a prisoner of war camp.... Personally, I think he's getting even with his party for treating him so badly in 2000.

After watching so much of the Democratic convention, on computer and a day late because I'm still in the Czech Republic, I had planned to not watch the republicans because I didn't want to hear more of their lies (8 years is enough). But now I've reconsidered because of this new twist. This could be quite amusing!

 I'll be in the States in time for the election and will spend my time working for Obama/Biden. I must say I'm in love with Barney Smith (check out his little speech if you haven't yet). Keep up the good work and don't give the republicans any help with what they should be doing to win the election!

 Sincerely yours, Grace DeLorenzo-Vyborny (a.k.a. LadyInPrague)

by LadyInPrague on 08/29/2008 09:34:06 PM EST


That's Barney Smith; not Smith Barney ... what a great line.

by gatekeeper50 on 08/29/2008 10:14:55 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Jayar, you are soooo right.  This is an absolutely terrible choice by McCain (and therefore good for us Democrats). 

How can someone spend the last two months arguing that their opponent has too little experience to be President, and then turn around and pick someone who is next in line to the Presidency who has ZERO national experience.  Her biggest accomplishment is turning down federal funds to a bridge to nowhere, but this is after she initially supported the idea.  Living in Kansas, I am surrounded by such naivety that this is a great choice.   It throws the best argument that McCain had out the window.  I truely feel that McCain is losing (or already lost) his mind. 

The one thing that does concern me is how the vice presidential debate will turn out.  Bush came out of the debates with Gore in good standing because everyone felt that he would get creamed.  With such low expectations for Bush and high expectations for Gore, it was easy for Bush to overperform, and for Gore to underperform.  Biden should come out of that debate a clear winner, but he has to tiptoe the line of being condecending to Palin. 

But I still feel that November 4th will be a great day for Democrats and the country.  I am excited about the Obama/Biden ticket, and while my state has a slim to none chance of coming out of its bigotedness, I hope that the people of Colorado, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada, New Hampshire, & Indiana realize how important they are in determining the future of this country.

by Z Man on 08/29/2008 09:58:31 PM EST


ONE republican capable of being a decent VP...
...
...
...
or mabye not... 

by holy noize on 08/30/2008 04:45:52 PM EST

[ Parent ]

a mile closer to the White House with this VP pick!

Thanks McCain!

by desertpear on 08/29/2008 10:29:56 PM EST


I don't know, but it sure looks like Karl Rove made that pick.

by gatekeeper50 on 08/29/2008 10:33:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
No, not Karl Rove.  Actually, it was Rush Limbaugh who made the actual pick -- really.  That's where they went, or HOW they went for the VP pick (check it out.)  I wonder if Rush Limpnuts is promised or wants a cabinet post for all '...he does' (not) for the Republican Party.  Imagine, taking the advice of one of America's biggest bigots.  What position does a person find themselves to feel compelled to make decisions like that??

by Lennilenape on 08/31/2008 01:47:10 AM EST

[ Parent ]
...Congratulations fellow lib-tards, we have just won the Nov. 4th election a full month ahead of time! Thanks a lot John "POW" McCain! How desperate does John McCain have to be, to flat out ignore his primary weakness(the economy) and put all his chips on a perceived division within his opponents party?! If you want to know exactly how STUPID this was, just look at how much money PUMA raised in the past 2 months since Hillary left the race. They raised a WHOPPING $50,000!!! Its ironic that the Republicans have been throwing the term "buyers remorse" around for the past week. Because I believe that once the "excitement" over picking the first Republican woman VP dies down, John McCain will be crying in his Metamucil about who he SHOULD HAVE picked. Another interesting(and by interesting I mean diabolically evil) angle is that there is no way she has been seriously vetted and that’s if she has been vetted at all! Already the intertubes are swarming with all kinds of rumors, from mild to wild. John McCain has just bet the success of his whole campaign on the political equivalent of a lottery ticket! And as a progressive I like those odds! 


…and on a totally different front; how damaging is this for Mitt Romney and all the other Republican  that were running for president?! There is no other way to look at this than, they are such terrible options, that an individual with next to NO experience is more appealing than them. When John McCain’s campaign goes down in a ball of flames and jet fuel the right wing will cast him out like a leper and his political career will be effectively over!

by AngryBlakGuy on 08/30/2008 11:49:33 AM EST


I thoroughly agree.  The new will wear off Ms. Palin in a couple of weeks.  Also the PUMA people will perhaps recognize that this woman is a, as described above  "femin-nazi". With the little information we know about her so far, it looks like she is way out of the mainstream to the right. She makes Cheney appear to be a flaming liberal.  She will appeal to the 27% or so that still cling to Bush but I predict in the next 2 months the feces will hit the fan blades for the rethuglicans. 

by psyche2 on 08/30/2008 01:12:00 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Great stuff, Jayar- you are completely right on this. You spoke truth immediately when the show began yesterday and I appreciate it. That said, Obama has to go after this individual immediately and with the gloves off- if they handle her any differently it will be a catastrophe for the country. This is such a joke- and yet it completely frightening.

To be clear- to even remotely connect her to Hillary Clinton is laughable- Sarah Palin is an intellectual invalid. Regardless of how one feels about Hillary Clinton, no one can deny how brilliant she is. I am terrified that this individual will be taken seriously.

by myeazel on 08/30/2008 04:33:36 PM EST


If he wanted to pick a woman to steal disaffected Pumas, why did he not pick one with experience? Aren't there any Republican women with experience?  I thought there were, but maybe they're all transvestites. What a freaking moron.

The simple fact that she makes him look like an unusually puffy resident of an old folks home in any picture of them together is going to hurt him plenty just by itself.

by adamandruth on 08/31/2008 12:14:13 AM EST


But is there any chance McCain watched Obama's acceptance speech, decided he had absolutely no chance and being president seemed like a lot of work anyway and decided to trade the whole thing in on trying to get his fantasy piece of ass?

You know, he said, "Fuck, I got no shot.  Maybe I can get some pussy out of the deal."

You have to admit, "How would you like to be the next Vice-President of the United States" is a pretty good pickup line, especially if you are trying to nail a politician.

I am starting to think he has just decided to settle for a sex romp tour of the country in the back room of the Straight Talk Express with his new "partner."

You did notice he sent Cindy all the way to Georgia (the far away one) right before making his pick.

by ProfRich on 08/31/2008 03:57:24 AM EST


Cindy is already filing for divorce.

by desertpear on 08/31/2008 01:35:55 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Well, she definitely has that naughty librarian thing going on.

by pmdtrans on 09/01/2008 09:45:57 AM EST

[ Parent ]
and who's that galloping up on stage???  All eyes shift to stage-right where, from around the corner, rides JEB Bush to the rescue of the GOP (Greedy Oil Polluters) and the Republican National Convention.  Sarah Palin ... just keee-ding (rim-shot)!!!  Rachel Maddow has often thrown out her conspiracy theory that old JEB would sub for a suddenly ailing McShame, but now the ex-Florida gov. can backdoor the presidency via a short stay at the Naval Observatory where he and the current occupant can plan the next 10 years of neocon imperialism. 

Ten years you ask.  Sure could happen:  two years of McShame (sorry nation but I have to resign for reasons of health) followed by two JEB terms = 10 years.

by gatekeeper50 on 09/01/2008 03:10:21 PM EST


Comments like: "punish Democrats for what they did to Hillary" say more about the writer than anything else.

Is it just possible that Hillary was not the best choice? Should she be selected mearly on the grounds that she is a woman?
THAT sounds like somthing the GOP would do....oh wait... THEY DID !!

It seems Obama could have secured more votes by selecting Hillary but he obviously puts his country first and made the best selection for the country and not the best for his chances.
On the other hand we have the exact opposite in the other camp, McBush (I mean McPOW) made a selection that is best for HIM and screw what it means for the future of the country.

CAN YOU IMAGINE....
McSame suffers a heart problem that puts him in hospital while he is President....The hockey-Mom steps up and must represent the USA in tough talks with Putin as the Russian military masses tanks along their border.
Pakistan breaks diplomatic ties with the west and refuses access accross the Afganistan border and the hockey-mom goes in for tough talks there.
The generals call an emergencey meeting and we have military staff with 20-40 years military experience around a table all looking at the soccer-mom for approval.
I find it hard to believe that she would or could have any input whatsoever.
It is quite clear that McSame was NOT thinking about the best VP for the USA at all !! 

Who would be best in such a situation? Palin or Biden?
This is not a trick question !

THIS IS INSANE!! 

Regardless of her genda, a small-town man with no experience would also be in the same position.

by Maverick on 09/02/2008 12:58:20 AM EST


You sound like an angry racist, but then most racist are angry....  so there probably isnt much hope you.

by mfb97 on 09/08/2008 02:53:12 PM EST


 Display: