Edwards' love child!

Email Print posted by hazmat 08/06/2008 02:13:18 PM EST

Google Technorati del.icio.us digg reddit
If you like this story, digg it!

Of course the photo's out of focus:

yay!

Update [2008-8-8 15:19:35 by hazmat]: Edwards admits it. But he's not the baby daddy. Jerry Springer, this is your chance for greatness.

< Steve "the Bullet" Schmidt drags McCain into the gutter | Celebirty Democrat Barack Obama vs. Celebrity Republican Ronald Reagan >
 Display:
Edwards' love child! | 24 comments (24 topical, 0 hidden)
Oh well (none / 0)
Does it really matter? It's not like I'd ever have voted for the guy anyway, considering he spent $400 on a haircut.

I need a president I can relate to, drink a beer with, crash a plane with, etc.  Not some pansy who spends hundreds of dollars for something he could've gotten for $20.

by ihavenobias on 08/06/2008 02:21:50 PM EST

Uncommon men (none / 0)
John Edwards is in elite company with Newt Gingrich, men who have cheated on wives suffering with cancer.

by Twba on 08/06/2008 02:51:44 PM EST

All he has to do now is (none / 0)
divorce her on her deathbed and he'll be just as revolting.

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 02:53:08 PM EST

[ Parent ]
it would help (none / 0)
if he also ran a highly publicized witchhunt and moral crucade against adultery. Yeah. Then he would be as revolting as Newt Gingrich. These are helpful comparisons. Thank you twba!

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 02:59:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]
These are helpful comparisons (none / 0)
Newt Gingrich is a highly intelligent adulterer; John Edwards is an adulterer.

You're welcome, Hazmat.

by Twba on 08/06/2008 03:16:29 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Dur dur dur (none / 0)
You're not very snappy.  I guess the one binary joke pretty much tapped you out.

by Spencer on 08/06/2008 03:21:08 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Dumb dem (none / 0)
Do you disagree that John Edwards is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier?

by Twba on 08/06/2008 03:25:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I was never really much of a fan. (none / 0)
But he's not as dumb as the guy who said women shouldn't serve in the military because "If combat means living in a ditch, females have biological problems staying in a ditch for thirty days because they get infections and they don't have upper body strength."  Those women and their dirty dirty vaginas.

by Spencer on 08/06/2008 03:31:34 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You're most kind (none / 0)
If only republicans like yourself were half as smart as Newt Gingrich, we could have this conversation on an even playing field.

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 03:28:11 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Sorry (none / 0)
I won't dumb myself down to the point where we have an even playing field, Hazmat.

by Twba on 08/06/2008 03:32:15 PM EST

[ Parent ]
How about we compromise (none / 0)
I'll skip inflating my tire next time I fill up if you can prove your IQ is above 88.

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 03:42:06 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Faith (none / 0)
Don't neglect your safety. Under inflated tires are much more prone to blow out.

You'll just have to take my word on my IQ.

by Twba on 08/06/2008 04:39:56 PM EST

[ Parent ]
skepticism (none / 0)

Its what prevents liberals from initiating ill-conceived foreign adventures.

 

I take it you have no proof. After having badly lost the original debate you will trade "snappy" comebacks until one of us leaves the room. Where's your chihuahua? I thought he'd be all over this thread.

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 05:24:23 PM EST

[ Parent ]
200 proof ethyl (none / 0)
I take it you have no proof.

If you know anything about IQ, you already know that it is very unlikely mine is below 100. You only have to look at vocabulary and grammar to see that.

by Twba on 08/06/2008 06:00:44 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Take heart (none / 0)
People of your abilities are "trainable", and with much effort can function as normal members of society. Very well, I'll concede that you're IQ is plausibly above 88 (mental retardation). I will therefore follow your advice and inflate my tires next time I fill up. Congratulations, you and Barack Obama share a policy agreement. I'm a uniter, not a divider.

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 06:08:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Like I said, not very snappy. (none / 0)
Congrats on posting on a topic that's not three weeks old though.

by Spencer on 08/06/2008 03:45:46 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Snapper (none / 0)
Sometimes there isn't another good thread for three weeks.

by Twba on 08/06/2008 04:40:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Hijacking my own thread (none / 0)
what kind of a world are we living in?

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 05:37:45 PM EST

Wheel of Misfortune (none / 0)

Its blurry....kinda look's like Pat Sajak....

Pat you devil you!

 

 

 

 

 

by MRFred on 08/06/2008 06:29:46 PM EST

sssssssssssssssssss (none / 0)

by hazmat on 08/06/2008 07:06:25 PM EST

Good thing for the Republicans (none / 0)
that they're running against John Edwards.

Oh.

Wait.

by jarett on 08/07/2008 03:54:26 AM EST

At least he's there (none / 0)
I'm glad to see he's not ignoring the child.  In all of this that's the test that actually counts. 

by bfaul on 08/07/2008 09:04:29 AM EST

wouldn't it be awful (none / 0)
if he made his girlfriend get an abortion? And was pro-life. I can't imagine someone that hideous.

by hazmat on 08/07/2008 10:27:16 AM EST

[ Parent ]
balk balkblkblkblkbaaaaaaalk (none / 0)

here chicky chicky chicky

by hazmat on 08/07/2008 12:03:57 PM EST

Edwards' love child! | 24 comments (24 topical, 0 hidden)
 Display: