Obama issues Memoranda on Fuel Efficiency and Energy

The first memorandum ordered the Transportation Department to work out rules for automakers to improve fuel economy. It calls for the department to notify automakers by March 2009 to increase their fuel efficiency for 2011 model year cars and trucks.    

The second memorandum ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider California's request for a waiver from the Clean Air Act -- a move that would allow California, the nation's most populous state, to set tougher tailpipe emission standards than apply nationally.

Obama Issues Memoranda  http://www.foxnews.com/poli tics/2009/01/26/obama-issue -memoranda-expected-far-rea ching-effect-auto-industry/

President Obama continued his reversal of Bush-era policies, issuing two memoranda on Monday that promote his clean-energy policy while having a far-reaching impact on the ailing U.S. auto industry.

Obama said the fix will help the auto industry produce a viable product.

"We must help them thrive by building the cars of tomorrow," he said in an announcement before a live audience in the East Room of the White House.

Obama said that Washington must help states on tougher fuel standards, not work against them, and yet year after year, special interests have overshadowed common sense and rhetoric has supplanted the hard work needed to yield results.

"America will not be held hostage to dwindling resources," he said. "The days of Washington dragging its heels are over. My administration will not deny facts. We will be guided by them. ... We cannot afford to pass the buck."

"Each step begins to move us in a new direction while giving us the tools that we need to change," Obama said.

He also encouraged Congress to pass the economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act, whose provisions he said will save $2 billion a year by making federal buildings more fuel efficient, among other items.  

Obama said America's dependence on oil is one of the most serious threats the nation faces -- it bankrolls dictators, stifles innovation and sets back the ability to compete. He added that "these urgent dangers to our national security are compounded by the long-term threat of climate change.

"These are the facts and they are well known to the American people," he said.

< The Obama Contest | Young Turks Videos >
 Display:
Just for fun, here's a video from 2001 of Charlie Rose discussing Bush's first week in office. Note the parallels and the stark differences. And the real-life Jabba the Hutt Charlie brought in for an interview.

by OneHitKill on 01/26/2009 07:35:34 PM EST

Finally somebody is doing something about emission standards. I do not have a link for this, but I know Europe's emission standards are like 35-40mpg right now. The technology is there so all this talk about it being too hard is a crock.

by gotchange on 01/26/2009 08:55:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]

This is a very encouraging story. Why didn't Bush do this in the first place when he was in office? What was his issue there? 

Anyway, I just hope this is the beginning on more positive things to come.

by Panamaschild on 01/26/2009 05:41:51 PM EST

He's been owned by the Bin Ladens ever since the '80s when they bailed out his Arbusto oil company. Guess they told him, NO.

Unless the puppet-massa Cheeney forbade Bush from doing anything that didn't make a big profit for Cheeney's friends.

I don't mean to be rude, but where have you been? Don't you know anything about the Bush family and their dirty dealings over the past 80 years? 

by zenie on 01/26/2009 06:50:00 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I heard today that some Repub tool complained that it's too difficult for the car companies to make different cars for every state.

DUH!

By making cars for the state with the highest energy standards, they make better cars for ALL states. Are Republicans really that stupid or is the greed just clouding their brains? Nah, the comment today was from an idiot.

by zenie on 01/26/2009 06:46:04 PM EST

How and what to make, why don't we just nationalize the industry and go into the car business? We've practically nationalized the banks and lending institutions. Isn't this what the Soviets tried circa 1917? How did that end up for them? Government is not there to tell businesses how to operate or what to sell! That's what the free market is for!!! :)

by bobo1 on 01/28/2009 08:49:05 AM EST

there is a big difference between telling companies what they need to do and telling them HOW to do it.  The market is very good at solving problems, but not so good at anticipating them (thus why the big 3 are nearly bankrupt because of the oil spike).  I guess you think auto safety regulations are also communism. 

by alphasigmookie on 01/28/2009 12:30:38 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: