Mike Huckabee and the End of Days; GOP Days

What has 10 legs and weighs 1500 pounds?

The Huckabee family of course.

Mike and the clan, pictured here in front of  their 3000 sqft pantry, are getting lean and mean for 2012.
 

Mike has made it no secret he intends to run again. God told him to run and by golly that's what he's going to do.

Why is Mike so hot to run in 2012?  First he doesn't want to be smoted (?) by a vengeful God.

Second Mike sees easy pickings going head to head with Sarah Palin and the Indian guy. Mitt Romney , no chance, even though a Brylcreem endorsement deal may help his campaign coffers.

Third,  other than the standard conservative crack delusions Mike wants to change the Constitution:

"I have opponents in this race who do not want to change the Constitution. But I believe it's a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living god. And that's what we need to do -- to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards so it lines up with some contemporary view. Mike Huckabee 2008"

Today the infallible Constitution is the document the birthers, miltias and the wing nut masses swear is under attack by Barak Obama. They are buying guns and ammo at record rate beacuse of a non existent threat to the Second Amendment. They are training in the woods , stocking up on rations and threatening armed revolution to protect "constitutional values". These folks are core conservative voters. GOP voters. The grass roots.

Now flash back to the primary campaign of 2008. At this juncture in time, the Constitution isn't good enough for the Christian GOP base, not godly enough. Hey, No problem! Let's change it! Needless to say the party hierarchy was astounded and horrified at Mikes revelation. The grass roots, not so much.

Hucakabee's gaffe and resulting tempest in a teapot may seem like old news but the idea that we need more God in government and a pure Christian and conservative ideology,  is at the crux of the internal battle that is underway in the GOP. A battle between the GOP old school and  populist conservatism represented by Hucakabee, Palin, Bachman, birthers, miltias and the wing nut masses

The revolution in NY District 23 , where the GOP faithful endorsed a third party candidate because the GOP nominee wasn't ideologically pure enough,  was the first shot in a long battle within the party.  

 ....if Republican activists decide that ideological purity must come first, that Maine’s Olympia Snowe must vote like Texas' Dick Armey and Tom DeLay, that Illinois’ Mark Kirk must sound like Minnesota’s Michelle Bachman; and that Connecticut’s Rob Simmons must be a clone of Alaska’s Palin then the GOP will have squandered an opportunity. Lloyd Green , Fox "News"

Sorry Llyod, they have already decided.

That decision will be bolstered by the fact that the Hoffman camp ( Conservative Party Candidate) is now claiming that he actually did win the election. Hoffman's defeat is a repeat of the Busby / Bilbray election of 2006, Hoffman prematurely conceded the race,  like Busby, now the counts of absentee ballots and error check are closing the gap and may be swinging to Hoffman's side in the race.

Hoffaman's "win" will be seen as a "sign" that the independent and GOP voters are looking for ideological purity in their candidate. Moderates and pragmatists need not apply. If the old school GOP elites can';t reign in the extreme right, a third party is sure to follow.

But wait Fred, didn't Huck say no third party on his Fox show? Yes, and no:

Whether we like it or not, we have a two-party system. Instead of conservatives breaking from the GOP to start a third party they should fight it out in primaries. It helps sort out who we are," said Huckabee, who joked that as a conservative he didn't get the bulk of Republican votes during his 2008 primary challenge to Sen. John McCain. He also decried efforts by established Republican groups to endorse candidates during primaries, as the Senate Republican Senatorial Committee has done in Florida, backing Gov. Charlie Crist over Marco Rubio. "They should allow the process to play out," said Huckabee. "It shows the disconnect between many establishment Republicans and their grass roots."

Mike had religious group endorsements out the wazoo in 2008, now  he decries "efforts by established Republican groups to endorse candidates during primaries"

You'll also notice he didn't exactly say which two parties. The primaries "sort out who we are". meaning in the end long as the GOP reflects his and the Christian rights values , he's fine with it.

Let the games begin.

< Link to Harry Reid's HR 3590 health care bill | Imagine if the Today's Right-Wing Were Around for Nuremberg (Update: AOL Poll) >
 Display:
Why doesnt your party start showing some results before you go name calling the other side.

The elections of 2010 and 2012 are going to be votes against Democrats and their Tax & Spend disasters...

You guys CONTROL the White House & Congress and still cant get anything done!

And you dare call Conservatives "teh Crazies"?

by bobo1 on 11/19/2009 01:17:59 PM EST

Rather "Tax & Spend" ....... which has shown to balance the budget

Than "Tax Cuts" & "Borrow & Spend" by you Conservatives . . which has been the real disasters ...

Since the last 30 years there has been 3 proclaimed Fiscal Conservatives & 1 tax & spend Democrat ... Bobo why is it that . .they only one among the 4 who has been able to balance the budget is the Tax & Spender???????

And you wonder why we call you folks "teh Crazies"??? .. LOL

A Proud Progressive!!!

by teron678 on 11/19/2009 01:38:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]

 

Name calling? You haven't seen name calling yet , pal. I don't recall asking for your opinion here but since you did;

One thing I know about you bobo is regardless of which party is in charge you are always on the "other" side.  In the vernacular I believe you are a contrarian " poser " or " bandwagonier" . I dare say your beliefs and principles are "fluid" Suggestion, if you want validation, find Kens latest tome and suck his crank. He might even thank you for it with a 'donation' or a honorary degree!

Therefore, in my humble opinion, your "opinion" has about as much validity as Palins abstinence teachings, Kens diplomas or Fox news.

Recall the US budget surplus when YOUR PARTY took office in 2001. In fact ,YOUR PARTY controlled both house of congress for most of Bushe's terms and didn't get anything done unless you count running up the deficit.

Please note that YOUR PARTY has controlled the White House and one or both houses of Congress for 28 of the last 40 years. 40 years that the US has been running a deficit.

Running record deficits during the GOP administrations and particularly  the  Housing Bubble when YOUR PARTY was in charge didn't seem to be a problem for you and your thick fore headed, knuckle dragging friends.

Now that the economy is in the tank and the Fed is the only thing between the US and a great depression, now your worried about deficits.

Hypocrite.

So, another and final suggestion, if you want to pick a fight, pick a side.

Otherwise, like the sign says,  shut the fuck up.

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/19/2009 02:52:57 PM EST

[ Parent ]
A sad tale for sure...

His messiah ObaMao has control of all of the power in the government and yet they cant even pass one meaningful piece of legislation... :(

So now instead of selling his ideas and generating support for his beliefs and values, he'd rather sit and bitch and complain about those "Wascillay Wepubwicans" who ruined our country, only to discover that in actuality there was NEVER a budget surplus, only unrealistic projections of one based on short term financing of loans and monies that never came to fruition...

He also sits and wonders how we got here, knowing that Democrats have controlled the congress (the ones who spend the money in those defecit eras) about 40 of the last 50 years (the only non Democrat control being 1994-2006) He likes to twist figures like "One or the other", but in fact we all know that spending can only originate in the House...

He dreams that the housing bubble was a "Wepubwican Pwobwem" when in fact is was "Bawney Fwank" and "Chawie Wangel" who told us that we were racists for not giving homeloans to poor colored people who couldnt afford to pay them back... So much for the "Wepubwican theowy" on that one...

He forgets that "major legislation" was passed during the Bush years, but most of it was to protect us from further attack and to bomb stupid Muslims back into the stone age, so that doesnt count in his eyes...


Hell, Barack ObaMao hasnt introduced ANY major war legislation and he STILL cant get any domestic changes accomplished even though he has control of the whole damn system!

All ObaMao has to do is say the word and our worries in iraq and Afghanistan could be home by Christmas - but of course, that doesnt benefit him or his party politically, so he'll bring them home around the middle of next October just before the 2010 election (how convienent). How many soldiers will die needlessly to benefit ObaMao politically???


Bitching about Bush and the Wascally Wepubwicans will get you nowhere, Russ - Like the old bumper sticker says "Cash, Grass or Ass: Nobody Rides for Free" - Its time for ObaMao and the Dems to PUT OUT OR GET OUT...

:) Hope the grandbabies are well....



by bobo1 on 11/19/2009 03:42:54 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Bobo1 .. your party had nothing to do with the deficits it was all the Democrats doing ... & please don't give me this B.S about  the house spends the money .. where were the fiscal conservatives from 2000 - 2006?????

Plus as proclaimed Fiscal Conservatives ... why didn't the Dubya, Bush Snr, or Raygun (the top 3 budget deficit contributors in modern US history) ... veto these Bills???

& what  "major legislation" did Dubya pass??? >> "FISA", "Patriot Act" & "Terror Alert Levels" all which were considered unconstitutional by those who actually follow the constitution

You say Obama hasn't done nothing ... so why the name "ObaMao"???

The Deficit is only important . . when you folks are out of power ......

A Proud Progressive!!!

by teron678 on 11/19/2009 04:14:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]

WTF are you talking about? "Wascillay Wepubwicans"?

That is a talent, I must say, typing like your giving a blow job. No, wait you think I 'm Ken! or are you drunk...again?

I am glad you know what I'm thinking.  Like I said, take a side or shut the fuck up.

So tell me Kreskin,  what am I thinking now?

But here's a little water to throw on your wingnut fantasy:

Drunk Bobo says  "there was NEVER a budget surplus, only unrealistic projections of one based on short term financing of loans and monies that never came to fruition..."

CBO the nonpartisan budget analysis arm of Congress said:

Congressional Budget Office projects higher 2000 budget surplus.

May 12, 2000

 The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that the projected U.S. budget surplus will exceed $200 billion for this fiscal year, up from its previous estimate of $179 billion.

The CBO, the nonpartisan budget analysis arm of Congress, also said that the portion of the surplus excluding Social Security reserves should top $40 billion, up from its previous $26 billion estimate for fiscal 2000, which ends September 30.

Higher budget surplus projections will likely ignite an already hot election year debate over whether to use the money for tax cuts or government spending.

Leaders of both parties have vowed not to use surplus funds from the Social Security trust fund, which leaves the estimated $40 billion for the fight over how to spend it.

The new figures could be good news for Texas Gov. George W. Bush, the likely Republican presidential nominee, who has agreed that there is enough of a federal surplus to pay for his five-year, $483 billion tax cut as well as spending proposals on education, health-care, housing and the environment. allpolitics.com

So I guess that Bush knew there was no budget surplus..and started deficit spending anyway.

So stick to teaching...no..don't do that either Arizona is 43rd in achievement test rankings.

Your response show why.

Way to go.

 (They are fine)

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/19/2009 05:39:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]
WTF are you talking about?

Why bother asking him when it's clear he has no idea?

by OneHitKill on 11/20/2009 11:16:02 AM EST

[ Parent ]

I'm still wondering where the Elmer Fudd ebonics came from.

ObaMao? Is that a wing nut inside joke? I'm sure the nutters were rolling in the isles when they read that.

He is also factually impaired. I suppose being Kens understudy has rubbed off.

I don't mind having a discussion but when a poster tells me what I'm thinking, particularly when I haven't even intimated that thought, ever, is a pisser.

 

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/20/2009 01:07:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]
smited works I think, since the proper "smitten" seems to change the meaning unforgiveably, somehow.

by hazmat on 11/19/2009 02:20:46 PM EST

Conjugating the word smite wasn't a lesson in Sunday School that I recall.

smite smote smitten?

smite smoted smoting?

 

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/19/2009 02:57:11 PM EST

[ Parent ]
means you like the person  heh

A conservative believes nothing should be done for the first time

by C D on 11/19/2009 03:00:32 PM EST

[ Parent ]

For instance

"Bobo is smitten with the smell of his farts in the shower."

 

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/19/2009 03:17:47 PM EST

[ Parent ]

A conservative believes nothing should be done for the first time

by C D on 11/19/2009 03:21:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 re-writing the Bible   so it comes as no surprise  they want to re-write the constitution.

Im looking forward  to the election. It will be fun to watch.

The Republican party is in such disarray  caused by the take over of the whackjob right,  Im sure they are going to field some very interesting yet unelectable candidates.

It will be great watching  the press trying to decipher  what the hell Palin just said.

Huckabee reaching out the the huge majority of Christians in this country , only to find as he did before.  They arent his kind of Christian.

Newt spouting the same old crap that causes them to lose elections and making things even worse because he also has to say some really really crazy shit to satisfy the new Republican base.

That picture of the Huckabees makes it hard to suppress the gag reflex.

A conservative believes nothing should be done for the first time

by C D on 11/19/2009 03:19:07 PM EST

is a deadly sin as I recall. Mike had a gastric bypass...yeesh...so toss some sloth in there as well.

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/19/2009 03:22:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I was just saying to my wife last night that I would put solid money down on Huckabee winning the next GOP primary run for the White House...I would bet, if money wasn't so tight these days. Huckabee is pretty much the only viable candidate that the Values Voters can really get behind, Romney is too stiff and a Mormon to boot, Palin has star power, but a FEMALE President??? I admit I don't watch Mike Huckabee's television program (is that still on?), but Huck is a smart guy, and he's watching this battle between moderates and extremist Theocrats (c'mon, that IS what they really are). If he can convince both sides of the Conservative spectrum that they MUST come to a consensus or lose power completely, well Huck might just make it. Hell, if he can gain the support of the independents and doesn't come up against any charismatic contenders from the Independent Right, he might even have a real chance of winning the whole thing.

Huck has been endorsed loosely by James Dobson and Pat Robertson; not so much with the Dick Armey crowd who claim Huck is is full of "counterproductive sweet talk." However, if Huck can get full support from the Evangelicals and convince the frustrated tea-party Independents that he's on their side, he really could win the Presidency, especially if Obama doesn't pull a 'Loaves and Fishes' type miracle soon. Problem with that is both of those groups are taken to political tangents and are easily swayed by rhetoric.

 So as for my bet, I'm waiting till the 2010 elections to put hard cash on the table. It will be much clearer once we see how much the Hill changes next year.

by uncledarren on 11/19/2009 03:48:00 PM EST

that it is predicated on the false notion that there are enough tea baggers to make a difference

A conservative believes nothing should be done for the first time

by C D on 11/19/2009 06:02:31 PM EST

[ Parent ]

don't like Huckabee. Many of their ranks think Huck is too moderate, and although Huckabee is working on the Evangelicals and the Populist-ragers, my prediction all depends on if the GOP can even stay together. Remember, I said IF Huck can turn them around to him. The reality is that this Conservative Civil war going on might just rip their power base apart.

 Actually, it also depends on if Obama's supporters can keep it together. There are so many factors going on in this country, it is almost impossible to calculate our National temperament.& nbsp;

 Hence, like I said, I'm not betting real money till the 2010 election results come in. I know Teabaggers THINK that they are the Majority, but that's just their misunderstanding about what a minority is...those folks are all white, therefore, they're not minorities...

 Hence--in Tea-bagger logic--they have the vote!

by uncledarren on 11/20/2009 01:27:55 PM EST

[ Parent ]

...but I did get the impression that Mike Huckabee would be about the only reasonable candidate the republicans have for president.  They probably won't go in that direction, we'll probably get Romney...but the reason is that Huckabee is so vanilla unassuming...

...I can't see what dirt they'd be able to get on Huckabee besides his ridiculous views.  But everyone knows the republican candidate is going to have stupid views no matter who they are.  

Huckabee is the most unassuming, inoffensive, safest possible pick the republicans could make.  I think he would actually stand a chance.  Palin would be an absolute abomination of a disaster.   Mitt Romney would have a chance, but I just get the feeling it would be less of a chance.

On a personal note, I can't stand Huckabee, he's so...I don't know...he just seems like a weird pedophile.  

by staticnz on 11/20/2009 01:47:26 AM EST

Sarah Palin would stand 0% chance.  She will never, ever, evvvveeerrrrr be the president.

 

Ever.

by staticnz on 11/20/2009 01:57:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]

of the religious right.

 

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/20/2009 09:04:20 AM EST

[ Parent ]
But they don't constitute enough of a majority to elect a Palin.   There's just no way.   Tina Fey alone would deprive her of 20 million votes.

by bfaul on 11/20/2009 11:03:52 AM EST

[ Parent ]
is a right wing nutjob

One of his first acts as governor was to block Medicaid from funding an abortion for a mentally retarded teen­ager who had been raped by her stepfather -- an act in direct violation of federal law, which requires states to pay for abortions in cases of rape.

He said he would oppose gay marriage "until Moses comes down with two stone tablets from Brokeback Mountain saying he's changed the rules."

 In true Backman wingnut style  he claimed that a "holocaust" of abortions had ­artificially created a demand for Mexican labor.

A conservative believes nothing should be done for the first time

by C D on 11/20/2009 03:19:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]

A conservative believes nothing should be done for the first time

by C D on 11/20/2009 03:21:22 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Same phenomenon with Tim Pawlenty.  The Conservative Taliban Party (formerly known as the Republican Party) is virtually 100% extremist, hateful lunatics, but because the extremism is mostly also accompanied by a vicious streak of complete, sneering, ugly rhetoric of dehumanization of Liberals (and perceived Liberals who are actually quite moderate or even Corporatist) as well as centrists, as well as non ditto-head Republicans, anyone who acts nice-ish toward the majority of Americans (i.e. the 81% who are not Dick Cheney devotees) is labelled a "moderate" by the MSM.  "Oh, Rick Santorum probably couldn't win because he takes tough stances on the issues, so Republicans might look to gentler, more nuanced voices like Pawlenty or Huckabee."  The rhetoric might be 10% "gentler", but neither of these people have done 5 things in their entire legislative careers that haven't toed the line of absolute Conservate authoritarianism.
 

by Milltycoon on 11/20/2009 04:52:45 AM EST

[ Parent ]

If your going to comment on my blogs at least extend me the courtesy of reading them first particularly when you are going to tell people what I am thinking.

Better still, don't comment at all.

Your comments are designed to start a flame war with people stupid enough to play your game and your participation adds nothing to the discussion other than polluting a thread with misinformation and lies.

Thanks for playing.



by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/20/2009 08:33:26 AM EST

I think that comment he made about amending the constitution is going to get rammed up his behind again and again - and it should.

by bfaul on 11/20/2009 11:06:14 AM EST

Look at the slimming effect those stripes have!

by OneHitKill on 11/20/2009 11:18:36 AM EST

No stripes

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stripes, could help here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stripes, incorrectly applied ..

 

 

 

 

 

Stripes, correctly applied

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/20/2009 12:43:26 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I wholeheartedly agree with your illustration of stripes correctly applied. But the guy in the photo above that looks like a walking zebra scrotum.

by OneHitKill on 11/21/2009 06:30:19 AM EST

[ Parent ]

"We are only 346 days away from a political tsunami."

 

Don't count your tsunamis before they hatch.  The voices of the teabaggers may be loud but they are all far right.   You have not heard from the center yet, who seem to be more aggravated that certain promises made to overturn certain Bush policies have not yet been met.   I've told you before and I'm telling you again, the displeasure of the center and the left does NOT translate into Republican support.   You're fooled because you live in a Republican stronghold and all your pals send you their conservative urban legend chain emails and slop from the same conservative trough, but outside of the new Confederacy the Republican brand still ranks down there with other things people scrape from the bottom of their shoes.  I doubt seriously that people who are aggravated at the sluggishness of recovery are going to express that anger by handing the keys back to the same assholes who drove us off the cliff.   The cons may have gotten away with their usual blame-the-other-guy thing if they had been able to keep the wheels on the economy until Bush left office, but the engine blew its gaskets six months too soon.   It won't play.

by bfaul on 11/20/2009 11:31:24 AM EST

I attend the tea parties and the townhalls.

I don't believe you. If only you could prove this claim.

Will there be vote splitting between Republicans and Conservatives?

There already is.

but when the Republican wins by 20 points

They won't.

by OneHitKill on 11/21/2009 06:26:04 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Here he tells us why Republicans will win 08 and how.

If it is incorrect, Rudy will win the presidency, because he can win NJ, PA, CT, RI, NH, WA, ME, WI much easier than Hillary can win OH, FL, NM, IA.

If it correct, then Romney will win the presidency, because he can win MA, NJ, PA, CT, RI, NH, WA, ME, WI much easier than Hillary can win OH, FL, NM, IA.

This is why you're worried, and you have good reason. It's called whistling past the graveyard.

Democrats' only hope is for Al Gore to enter the race. Believe me when I tell you, it will happen.

So Kenny, when is Gore entering the race for 08?

Here again Kenny tells us how it's going to be.

The nominee will be Al Gore. You can pay homage to my genius when it happens. 

Yes Kenny we all  stand in awe of your ability to prognosticate.  ;

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill

by Hubble on 11/21/2009 08:48:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]
You REALLY DON['T PAY ATTENTION.

Unlike you I'll be the first to admit when I'm wrong. So here ya go. I was wrong.

Of course you saying I love Obama is not even close to accurate as you are aware and I have repeatedly said that I wasn't a big fan of his or his policies or lack there of.

What I have also said is that after 8 years of the cluster fuck that was George Bush and the Republican Congress who managed to not protect us on 9-11, take us into two wars costing Trillions, with no end in sight (one totally unnecassary), doubling the National Debt, and passing laws stripping us of basic rights,  overturning any regulation designed to protect the people they can in order to increase their corporate masters bottom line, managing to totally destroy our economy in the process, then I'm willing to wait a little more than 1 year before I actually pass judgement.

I could list more reasons I prefer Dems over ShrubCo but I think I've made my point.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill

by Hubble on 11/21/2009 10:48:21 AM EST

[ Parent ]
No Spin involved just plain admission of being wrong.

Now that I admitted I was wrong, when is Gore going to enter the race for 08 so I can "Pay Homage to your genius"?

So what candidate on the Republican side took the nomination was it Mitt or Rudy l know you said it would be one or the other?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill

by Hubble on 11/21/2009 10:53:33 AM EST

[ Parent ]


He did win.

He would have been a two termer.

He would have won the South back for Democrats.

He would  have  been a decent president.

But instead, look what we got.

8 years later we are still paying for it.

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/21/2009 12:19:57 PM EST

[ Parent ]
They call us "the Crazies", but Obama, Pelosi and Reid are proving to be just what the doctor ordered to get this country moving back in the right direction - toward Conservatism. I just hope the GOP takes the initiative to know who will be best to replace Obama in 2012...

by bobo1 on 11/20/2009 02:56:36 PM EST

What I (We) dont get is the significance of Wascillay Wepubwicans" "Wepubwican Pwobwem" "Bawney Fwank" "Chawie Wangel" "Wepubwican theowy" . I've have never seen a drunk slur his words in a blog before. Good job.

Damn son, at least drink a chaser to take the edge off. Fat drunk and stupid is no way to go through life. Since I straightened you out on budget surpluses and who actual spent them,

....knowing that Democrats have controlled the congress (the ones who spend the money in those defecit (sic) eras) about 40 of the last 50 years....

I think you need some instruction on the budget process since you obviously don't have a fucking clue.No forget it. Pointless. So you want the country to turn towards conservatism. Yeah, right. You just want a change so you can bitch about it.

You don't stand for anything, why in the fuck do you even bother?You're a waste of time. Please refrain from polluting my blogs in the future.

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/20/2009 03:44:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
As someone who knows he has lost the overall argument. You can bitch and complain and call me names all you want, but you know I'm right - spending at the levels that ObaMao wants to is unsustainable. Its his economy now, stop blaming Bush for all of your misery. ObaMao has the power to implement change, so why doesn't he do it?

by bobo1 on 11/20/2009 08:34:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]
If I had them I'd be King!

It never ceases to amaze me that Cons can so quickly turn on a dime.

Quiz, time Bobo what icon of neo conservatism said the following  "deficits don't matter"?

Now if it's good enough for the neocons why when a Democrat takes the White House does deficits that the Republican Party caused suddenly matter?

Yes, we know it's now Obama's economy, because that's what Faux News, Rush, Sean, and Mr. Weiner tell us, but that doesn't excuse the hypocracy of only being concerned about the clean up after you and your party shit all over the dinner table and then scurried out the door bitching about the smell.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill

by Hubble on 11/20/2009 09:59:55 PM EST

[ Parent ]

that you often confuse contempt for anger.

Your out of your league here. Take your silly little 'Obamao' canard and haunt Kens threads.

He's on your level.  If your nice to Ken, he'll make you an honorary Texas Ranger, with a badge and everything!

by Sock Puppet Fred on 11/21/2009 08:04:39 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: