11/21/2009 03:53:46 AM EST
The legality of rape?
posted by Thothlike
I’ve been following the coverage of the gang rape of Jamie Lee Jones by fellow KBR-employees in Iraq… and subsequently the Franken Amendments attempt to rectify that you can be contractually obligated to go to arbitration instead of court…
But one thing strikes me as VERY odd…
Why is the Franken Amendment necessary… I mean how can you contractually absolve someone of a crime?
Maybe someone with more legal expertise in US Law than I have can answer this question…
But it seems to me that any criminal act is the responsibility of the police and district attorney and not the individual itself… it is a case for criminal court not civil court (or arbitration)… or am I wrong?
How can it be possible for anyone to contractually say it’s ok for you to commit a criminal act?
In my book that would be like saying let’s write up a contract where I give you permission to murder me or a bank manager and a bank robber get together beforehand and draw up a contract that stipulates that it’s ok for the bank robber to rob the bank of the bank manager and then after you kill me or rob the bank the police and the courts could do nothing because ‘hey they had a contract’… to me that’s just ludicrous… it just flies in the name of reason…
I know the case of Jamie Lee Jones and KBR happened on Iraqi soil and that might play a part legally in that particular case but it was still committed by American employees in an American based company and to an American citizen… so in my book it shouldn’t play a part…
But let’s discuss and see what the TYT-army thinks…
Is the Franken amendment even necessary?
And more importantly should it be legal to contractually absolve someone from any crime (incl. rape)?
Love Thothlike