Why Firing Phelps Might Cost Kellogg More Customers

Kellogg Co. recently fired Michael Phelps for admitting he smoked marijuana (after a picture of him taking a bong hit came out on the press). This is a decision that would have been absolutely justified in 1955. But this is 2009. No one gives a damn. In fact, they are more likely to lose customers than gain them by making such a public display of their displeasure.

You know how many people have smoked marijuana in America? A whopping 42%. That is a huge chunk of the country Kellogg has just personally insulted because they are saying implicitly that their behavior is so wrong that they would fire them over it.

But what's worse is the even larger percentage who don't care if anyone else smokes marijuana and are turned off by anyone else who judges them for it. Now, I'm not a pothead. I don't think hemp is the answer for all of our problems (you know someone smokes a lot of pot when they feverishly tell you that you can make pants out of hemp - yes, but is that what you do with it?) . But I - and everyone else I know - could not possibly care less if someone else wants to smoke pot.

Yes, there is still a certain percentage of the country that is mental about this. They have no problem if their son drinks two gallons of alcohol, but a joint and they lose it. I think this is a cultural thing more than anything else. I think pot represents hippies, liberals and all that's wrong with America to them. And yes, this is about 25% of the country.

But what about the other 75%? You annoy them when you side with the prudish minority. You offend their sensibilities when you kowtow to the puritan zealots. Every single person I have spoken to says they are less likely to buy Kellogg products now that they have fired Michael Phelps. Not because we love Michael Phelps, not because we think you can make pants out of hemp, but because it seems like they are choosing sides in the culture war. And it's the wrong side.

Now, advertisers are scared to death of doing anything political. But this firing is political. You are choosing sides with the minority of the country that cares about so-called moral improprieties like this. As a business, is that the side you want to be on? Do you really want to go against the interest of the sizeable majority?

The country has changed dramatically since the 1950's. And it appears the only people who haven't caught on to this are advertisers. You are no longer protecting your brand when you are prudish and overly careful. You just seem out of touch. Ozzie and Harriet don't exist anymore, so why are you still trying to sell them products?

Unfortunately, this outmoded way of thinking for the advertisers has enormous implications for our media, too. The sponsors are the boss. If they want plain, vanilla, boring, unchallenging programming - that is exactly what they'll get. They are scared to death of advertising in anything that pushes the envelope. So, interesting, edgy programs get edged out (or they go to HBO).  

So, this antiquated mindset isn't just annoying and counterproductive, it causes the watering down of all entertainment. Whenever a big advertiser comes into a new program, the first thing they want you to do is tone down everything you do. It makes everything on television more boring, less challenging and ultimately more fake. Sponsors believe fake sells. If you're too honest or if you act like a real human being, as Phelps did the other day, then you have to be avoided at all costs. Otherwise Ozzie and Harriet will be offended. That would be true if they hadn't died thirty years ago.

Young Turks on You Tube

Update: Should Kellogg have fired Michael Phelps? Vote in AOL's Hot Seat Poll right now.

< Should we care so much about being b-ipartison | Suicide Is Painless >
 Display:
I don't smoke pot or anything else, but I don't judge those that do either. It's your body, do as you please.

It was careless for Phelps to allow someone to take pictures of him taking a hit, he had to know someone was going to cash in on it because he is known world wide! That person must have made some coin off of it!

Though I'm not sure if the sales of Kelloggs would go down because of this, I mean when you are hungry for cereal, do you really care that it's a Kelloggs product? No, you just take it and go! I don't think people consciously remember what Kelloggs did to Phelps and put it back???

by MintieFresh on 02/09/2009 04:54:15 AM EST

Stop the presses -- an athlete has been caught smoking pot!! This is news?!?  I say, he’s just a kid!! We’ve all made mistakes.  Leave Michael Phelps alone!!! (After you listen to this parody and send it to everyone you know!!)  See “Because Michael Phelps Got High” at http://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=uK09SS0zYHg 


by thincaboutit on 02/09/2009 05:11:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
They should give the guy a break, he admitted to doing it and he apologized.

by manny phesto on 02/09/2009 05:26:54 AM EST

I'm one of the 42%, don't care to smoke, but I intend to write to Kellog and share my annoyance by no longer purchasing their products, once upon a time it worked in our favor with Coors.

by veejay on 02/09/2009 08:32:21 AM EST

Don't they know that potheads eat cereal?

by YuryTheEnglishTutor on 02/09/2009 01:05:52 PM EST

unless Kellogg's is going after a new demographic...its Micheal Phelps approved!

"Freedom is important to Republicans as long as someone else pays for it on the battlefield and on April 15th."

by MRFred on 02/09/2009 01:11:37 PM EST

Cenk,

I simply don't agree with the argument you're trying to make regarding Michael Phelps. He relinquished the luxury of engaging in behavior typical of the average 20 year-old when he signed on as a role model to the tune of 100 million dollars in endorsements.

Yes, America's position against pot as some major scourge on our society is outdated and stupid. But at the present time, smoking it is still illegal for all except those individuals using it under medical supervision.

I'm sure Kellog's, along with the slew of other companies Phelps endorses included behavior clauses in their contracts. One would think he was aware of this when he was sucking on a bong with a room full of "regular" 20 year-olds.

Perhaps Kellog's decision to drop him was harsh. But when one assumes the exalted position of 100 million dollar role model, they're no longer like everyone else. They can't drink and drive, smoke pot, and continue to say sorry for using poor judgement. Sometimes, poor judgement yeilds harsh consequences. 

by mowenb on 02/09/2009 07:24:40 PM EST

He didn't relinquish shite.  He busts his butt and has some downtime, and some trusted "friend" aims a camera and does this to him.  Not cool.

P.S. Hemp makes excellent paper  :-)

by adeane on 02/09/2009 08:43:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
they don't want someone who broke the law on their covers.
Also I disagree with you mainly on the interesting edgy part, advertising is always pushing teh bounds and trying to reach out to young consumers. Maybe kellogs isn't though.

by nmaks on 02/09/2009 07:39:44 PM EST

They are entitled to spend it as they wish.

"People who boast of ancestry often have little else to sustain them." LL

by Robrob on 02/09/2009 10:40:53 PM EST

i have never eaten any kellogg products before, but i might have to start eating their cereal (after first writing them a letter explicitly stating that my sole reason for patronizing their products is their decision to fire phelps).

the reason is simple: 

smoking marijuana is illegal in most, if not all, states in the u.s.

it does matter one flying fuck if 42% of dumfuck americans have smoked pot.

more than 42% of american dumfucks voted for bush/cheney, not once, but twice. so any argument whose basis is that it has the support of 42% of american dumfucks is a dead-on-arrival argument.

more than 42% of dumfuck americans believe in god and that the entire universe was created in 6 days 6000 years ago. so any argument whose basis is that it has the support of 42% of american dumfucks is a dead-on-arrival argument.

more than 42% of american dumfucks have cheated (and plan to cheat) on their taxes. that does not make tax cheating any more legal or worthy of adulation---regardless of what borat and his cronies might think. 

if you want to question the legality of a ban on pot, that get borat to change the law _first_, and _then_ complain about kellogg doing whatever they want to do with their money and sponsorship.

 

if phelps really did smoke pot, he needs to rot in jail, just as the law says he should. if you don't like the law, move to jamaica, maaan.

by neo on 02/09/2009 11:10:49 PM EST

'he needs to rot in jail'???

You're completely fucking crazy, neo. You must be a troll.

HELP! Somebody please do something about this troll!

God, I need a spliff...

by dan pearce on 02/10/2009 06:59:39 AM EST

[ Parent ]

I recommend we follow EVERY law to the letter and throw the book at all these lawbreakers! There should be no nuance when it comes to the law because the law IS the law! You don't like it? Eff you! As you so astutely put it, move to Jamaica, maaan...

Man, where's that SACK of joints i rolled last week? I really need one after reading that ridiculous excuse for a post. Jackass.

by theaocp on 02/10/2009 12:38:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You dont "rot in jail" for smoking pot. You would barely get a ticket for smoking pot in California. If that.

Republicans portray the government as the enemy. Then when they take over, they prove it.

by Chinese Democracy on 02/10/2009 04:20:15 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"if phelps really did smoke pot, he needs to rot in jail, just as the law says he should. if you don't like the law, move to jamaica, maaan."

If you don't know the law, maybe you should do a little research before telling others where to move?

"People who boast of ancestry often have little else to sustain them." LL

by Robrob on 02/11/2009 12:04:13 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: