Ron Paul on Pirates - letters of marque

A little-known congressional power could help the federal government keep the Somali pirates in check — and possibly do it for a discount price.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and a growing number of national security experts are calling on Congress to consider using letters of marque and reprisal, a power written into the Constitution that allows the United States to hire private citizens to keep international waters safe.

Used heavily during the Revolution and the War of 1812, letters of marque serve as official warrants from the government, allowing privateers to seize or destroy enemies, their loot and their vessels in exchange for bounty money.

The letters also require would-be thrill seekers to post a bond promising to abide by international rules of war.

In a YouTube video earlier this week, Paul suggested lawmakers consider issuing letters, which could relieve American naval ships from being the nation’s primary pirate responders — a free-market solution to make the high seas safer for cargo ships.

“I think if every potential pirate knew this would be the case, they would have second thoughts because they could probably be blown out of the water rather easily if those were the conditions,” Paul said.

“If we have 100 American wanna-be Rambos patrolling the seas, it’s probably a good way of getting the job done,” said Competitive Enterprise Institute senior fellow and security expert Eli Lehrer. “Right now we have a Navy designed mostly to fight other navies. The weapons we have are all excellent, but they may not be the best ones to fight these kinds of pirates. The only cost under letters of marque would be some sort of bounty for the pirates.”

According to Senate historians, Congress hasn’t issued a letter of marquee since the War of 1812, but the Confederate States of America issued them during the Civil War to deliver supplies behind enemy lines. There are also some indications that a letter was granted to a flying band of armed civilians during World War II to operate the Resolute, a Goodyear Blimp used to patrol the ocean for enemy submarines, but the issuance isn’t apparent in the Congressional Record.

" alt="Ron Paul Pirates" title="Ron Paul Pirates" />


 

< Face to Face With The Train Wreck That Is Our Foreign Policy | pirate solutions? >
 Display:

I can never get the darn embeds to work on this site, here's the youtube link

http://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=VrCqVYVxEoA

by 5kfun on 04/15/2009 10:42:44 AM EST


This is no longer the 1800's. "Blackwater" represents the current state of "privateers." Do you REALLY think it's such a wonderful idea to send private navies out there?

Why doesn't the SHIPPING industry come up with a solution?

Why would a Libertarian want the Government to be involved at all?

What a joke.....

by MedfordTim on 04/15/2009 11:03:27 AM EST

Pay the Pirates...cheaper than hiring security. They said so on Fox of all places.

After the first fishing boat...manned with pre-teen boys as is the practice in the area...gets smoked by the Privatteirs then what?

No..its an exceptionally bad idea. Its a problem for a blue water Navy. Unfortunately ours has withered on the vine at the hands of the Bushies. Don't get me wrong...we have exceptionally capable ships...just not enough.

But if they do issue Letters Of Marque...what do you say Tim..wanna sign up on MRFreds Pirate Buster cruise?

 

"Freedom is important to Republicans as long as someone else pays for it on the battlefield and on April 15th."

by MRFred on 04/15/2009 04:34:56 PM EST

[ Parent ]

...unless you're talkin' Aruba...

by MedfordTim on 04/15/2009 06:47:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The fishing boats often pursue tunafish, and it's not uncommon for them to follow them right up next to merchant ships. These are fishermen with no malicious intent.

Crews usually don't know they're getting boarded by pirates before it's too late.

I think it's a disastrous idea, bound to get innocent people killed.

-J

by Scandinavian Chef on 04/15/2009 06:55:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]
but Bonaire was much nicer.

"Freedom is important to Republicans as long as someone else pays for it on the battlefield and on April 15th."

by MRFred on 04/15/2009 10:30:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
bad idea, cant see how it would stop any pirating in the area, and it would be open to abuse by the pirates themselves, declaring they killed pirates when in fact they just sank on camera a usless hulk and clam bounty money, no not a good idea.

by jamesbgood on 04/15/2009 11:37:03 AM EST

I love the idea, but its not the best solution. If the companies would heavily arm the ships and train the crews, it would immediately solve the problem.

A big freighter with rocket launchers will defeat a fishing boat with rocket launchers.

We need new international laws regarding armed ships entering ports. (I didn't say it would be easy.) 

by KenTX on 04/15/2009 07:33:42 PM EST

A big freighter with rocket launchers will defeat a fishing boat with rocket launchers.

Suggestion. Stay on land..you'll live longer.  Answer this question, what's easier to hit? A container ship that has a few million sq ft of FLAT reflective surface area and huge heat sources...near the bridge as a rule...or a small fishing boat with a few hundred sq ft.of surface area that can maneuver faster and present a smaller target?

 

Even though the problem sounds big,  ships are attacked at a rate of  1 per 3000 transits based on industry numbers. When they do attack the success rate is very low

That being said shipping companies are perfectly happy not to spend the money for security. They already said as much. Its cheaper to pay a ransom occasionally than hire security and outfit ships with deterrent capability.

It also takes more fuel to steam closer to the Arabian peninsular where the US ships are.

The upside is that they can charge extra for freight that must ship through the Suez.

And no this isn't me hating on the shipping companies. Its simply business.

"Freedom is important to Republicans as long as someone else pays for it on the battlefield and on April 15th."

by MRFred on 04/15/2009 10:49:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"shipping companies are perfectly happy not to spend the money for security. They already said as much. Its cheaper to pay a ransom occasionally than hire security and outfit ships with deterrent capability."

Amusing how the RWnuts are against the thing they claim to love most.

"People who boast of ancestry often have little else to sustain them." LL

by Robrob on 04/15/2009 11:17:07 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: