Don't Ask Don't Tell

Enough is Enough!!!!!

President Obama campaigned against 'don't ask don't tell.' I just saw, on MSNBC, that the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the policy. This is ridiculous. They say that they don't want to risk troop moral/cohesion with a change in the policy. BS!!! This relies on the assumption that the men and women in the military are bigots. I don't believe that. We all know that in this time of our overburdened military, we need anyone willing to serve. The classic example of this is all of the Arabic translators who have been kicked out of the army for being gay. Ridiculous, dangerous and detrimental to national defense.
Another thing I don't understand about this policy: Women serve in the military. How is men and women to serve together any different from adding homosexuals to the mix.
This policy is embarrassing, disgraceful and has been around for far far too long.

I found this clip both inspiring and heartbreaking. Lt. Choi is 100% correct...Love IS worth fighting for.


< You're Right: An Answer to jerrytown | "Population control thing" in china >
 Display:
A new Gallup poll shows that 69 percent of Americans are now in favor of openly gay men and women serving in the military, up from 63 percent five years ago. Support among liberals and Democrats remains high -- around 86 percent and 83 percent respectively -- but the biggest shift in support occurred among conservatives and Republicans. Fifty-eight percent of people who identify as conservatives say they support gays serving in the military, up from 12 points from 46% in 2004. Fifty-eight percent of Republicans support what is essentially a repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."


by Chinese Democracy on 06/08/2009 02:42:06 PM EST

You should keep your sexuality private too. No dates. No catcalls. No flirting. And most important...NO BONERS!

by LadyFriend on 06/08/2009 07:26:23 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Some time ago i heard a radio show discussing manliness in the military (i'm german and it was a german radio station). They interviewed an recruitment officer of the "Koninklijke Marine" -- the Netherlands Marine Corps if you will. They are aming their recruitment for maybe the top five percent of men (from a physical point of view) and do not accept women. Why? Not because women are arguably not as fit as men are. The top one percent of women can surely compete with the top five percent of men, so they could widen their recruitment base by one fifth. But their target group for recruitment, young physically fit man, would be less interested in joining the corps if they would accept women. Muy macho and so on. The point is: it dosen't matter (to the military) what the average conservative thinks about openly gay men and women serving in the military, but what the recruitment target group (like 18 to 25 year old conservative men or so) think. Do they gain more personnel from gays than they lose from homophobic men? So from the military's point of view, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" may make sence.

by michaja on 06/09/2009 06:16:26 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I never really thought of it from a recruitment point of view. Interesting point. I still think this is not giving the troops the credit they deserve.

by LadyFriend on 06/09/2009 09:29:21 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The British armed services set up a recruitment stalls at the Gay Pride festival in Manchester.

At the stalls, the men in uniform, complete with medals, mingled with eager would-be recruits.

 Lieutenant-Colonel Leanda Pitt, commander of regional recruiting in the northwest, said: "It is such a massive event in the Manchester calendar that we can't afford not to attend. As far as the army is concerned, sexual orientation is a private matter."

Additionally the Israeli military recruits openly gay soldiers. The IDF is regarded as one of the top armies in the world.

They dont seem to be that worried about driving away homophobes.


by Chinese Democracy on 06/10/2009 02:56:52 AM EST

[ Parent ]
One of the leading cause of stagnation in social progress in America, and some other choice countries, is their inability, or flat-out denial to look at PRECEDENT.

For instance, some other countries treat criminals humanely and with rehabilitation programs. PRECEDENT shows success. These countries have ridiculously lower crime rates.

MANY other countries have socialized health care. This has also shown a very noticeable improvement in their general health.

And, more relevant, other countries have openly gay militaries. They show not only is it a non-issue as far as military effectiveness, but it also decreases the amount of sexually-based military harassment, as much of it, as things stand, is based off the fear of being accused of being homosexual and losing your job.

Just what the -hell- is preventing us from looking at these other, already ESTABLISHED examples. Progress isn't made solely in America, societies around the world are trying new things, and sometimes they succeed. One would assume that in order to optimize our society, we would use programs that are proven to work.

But that is not the case.

by Dradeeus on 06/09/2009 12:15:25 AM EST

we have OVERLY religious people in this country and arrogant people... mostly on the right, who hold American up on this shinning hill with a banner that states the opposite of what makes sense in society.  

Openly gay military... who cares, if a person wants to serve, obviously they can serve.  I mean this don't ask don't tell thing is ridiculous because whether or not a person is gay in the military, they will still be gay even if they say they are or if they don't... I wonder how many gay soldiers there are right now, giving their hearts around the world now?

healthcare and violence, that to most Americans just don't make sense.  When you hear about healthcare, socialized healthcare... most RED BLOOD, Toby Keith singing "Proud to be an American" Americans will call that socialism  without doing the research for themselves while spouting, that's not the American way... not realizing that it's cheaper and provides a better healthcare system than that of the one we currently have also not realizing the wonders it's done for other countries...

I mean, what's stopping the progress in America usually comes down to religion and arrogant Americans (conservatives) to which by definition of Conservatism is a political and social term from the Latin verb conservare meaning to save or preserve. As the name suggests it usually indicates support for tradition and traditional values though the meaning has changed in different countries and time periods. to break that down, basically means people who don't want to change... and if you don't change, you can't progress, which will cause a down turn in life and society.

by Erauprcwa on 06/12/2009 12:56:22 AM EST

[ Parent ]
You never learn!

All of those evil, ignorant countries can't compare to America's greatness!  It's un-American to say that they do things better than we do!  Besides, they're evil socialists!

  1. Only individual initiative has made this country great.

  2. Everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps.

  3. It is the unfettered, unregulated free market that is the great engine of our economy.

  4. Government just gets in the way.  Government is the problem and it should be made very small and weak.  Government interferes with the moral people who are trying to pursue their self-interest to become prosperous. Because government interferes with them, it is un-American to promote government.

  5. You know how to spend your money better than the government does.

SO WHAT if the result of all of our conservative ideas is that more people are impoverished, there is more violence and death, and the air and water start to stink?  That only happens because the rest of you are immoral!

NOTE: The author of this comment doesn't believe a single thing that he just wrote.  Arguments 1-5 are courtesy of George Lakoff.

by AnEngineer on 06/09/2009 12:40:51 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Government is the problem and it should be made very small and weak.  EXCEPT when people decide to have abortions or gay marriage or legal marijuana.
THEN we have to expand government.  DEREGULATE THE MARKETS AND REGULATE WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS!

by birdboy1 on 06/11/2009 09:28:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You understand it too well -- you might be getting infected with right-wingism!  Flee!  Flee!  Get away while you can!

by AnEngineer on 06/12/2009 07:07:48 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I will give you a little positive reinforcement here. There is incredible polarization between left and right in this country. Neither side is good at tolerating commonly spouted views of the opposition This is a bad thing and leads to bitterness and less progress.
But, there is no possible way to defeat conservative views with free speech? This is the same as your complaint but reversed. The same could be said of liberal views from a left-leaning perspective.
I would bet that students at Berkley are not very tolerant of conservative POV's. But, students at Liberty or Patrick Henry University are not allowed to hold liberal views. That sword has two edges.

by LadyFriend on 06/09/2009 11:37:30 AM EST

Remember Dave the moderator can delete your posts no matter what you do.

You better hope that he doesn't get tired of your b/s

maybe you better fire off one of your emails explaining what a good guy you are.


by Chinese Democracy on 06/11/2009 01:29:06 PM EST

Excuse me, did you watch that video? He was fired because he is gay...prevented from serving because he is gay.
I don't usually get pissed at ur posts, but in this one you are really being an asshole. Gays sashay like Judy Garland? Should lesbians have to wear heels? Is it ok is they do the same rugged missions as the men? You have to see why your comment is insane. I am going to hope that you just get off on offending people and that you are not as ignorant as your comment makes you sound. Why should they be forced to stay in the closet? If you have a reason, please...I would love to hear it.

by LadyFriend on 06/08/2009 07:25:07 PM EST

I think it's wrong that women can't engage in ground combat. They should have to reach the same physical qualifications as anyone else serving in that arena. If they can, they why should this be prevented. I get that there are physiological differences between the sexes. If women can perform at an acceptable physical level, there should be no reason to keep them from that service.

by LadyFriend on 06/09/2009 11:33:00 AM EST

[ Parent ]
G.I. Jane?  that's how I feel about women in the military... If you can do it just as good or BETTER, then why not?  women can be just as good if not better than the men.  equal rights... just like if a person can't perform in the military, they won't make it, they won't graduate from basic training...

by Erauprcwa on 06/12/2009 01:08:01 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Suck my dick!!
(Sorry so crude...but, it's my favorite line!)

by LadyFriend on 06/12/2009 09:22:39 AM EST

[ Parent ]

...that you have some sort of nature vs. nurture argument to be able to justify your position, but could you substitute "black" or "Jew" for "gay" and be happy with your assessment?  "Our military is doing a good job, and they don't want any blacks tap dancing or Jews counting money in the foxholes next to them.  That would be an obvious negative effect on morale (to ignorant people like yourself.)  If blacks want to organize a 20-minute-late military gold tooth pageant or Jews want to organize a briscuit and gelfilte fish dinner, I'm sure they would do a marvelous job, cracker/mensch."

I know--the argument is that sexuality is interior (unlike race) and if no one mentions it, no one will know.  That doesn't cover you from the religious part of my example, but regardless, it is bullsh*t anyway.  I have many friends in the military.  It is largely a bunch of 20-year-old guys killing time for months on end in close quarters.  You don't think (hetero) sex is brought up and discussed 50 times a week?  You don't think the guys talk about female celebrities and girlfriends and fellow female soldiers?  And female CIVILIANS in Iraq?  You don't think that most men can determine who in their unit is almost surely gay within a week without those soliders "putting the make on them in the heat of combat?"

This isn't Will and Grace, Ken.  We need all of the recruits we can get.  Morale drops a lot more from the fatigue of not having enough men than it does from proximity to something slightly out of a few bigots' comfort zones. 

by Milltycoon on 06/09/2009 12:45:39 AM EST

[ Parent ]
The reality is that gays are not comfortable talking openly about "graphic homo sex" in general because our culture (especially males) is grossly homophobic. I think this is wrong. I can't see this as any different from people not being ok with interracial couples walking holding hands. The only way to change this is to let gay culture out of the closet. The stereotype that gay men are constantly hitting on straight males is offensive, in my opinion. It smacks of insecurity and honestly, I find it pathetic. As a female I have learned to accept that men I have no interest in are viewing me as a sex object. Why do men have so much trouble when this is reversed. If you are straight and comfortable with your sexuality, you should have no problem with another man being attracted to you. It could actually be seen as an unwelcome compliment. Females living with catcalls have gotten used to this. Men need to suck it up and face reality and stop being such infants about their sexuality. It should not be threatening.

by LadyFriend on 06/09/2009 11:24:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I assumed that you were fine with women seeing you as a sex object. My question is why it is so threatening for men to see you as a sex object. In my experience, this freaks guys out and I think it's irrational.

by LadyFriend on 06/10/2009 11:57:29 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I don't have a problem if women want to view me as a sex object.

Even if that "sex object" is a cock ring?

by OneHitKill on 06/11/2009 11:02:17 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I dont mind straight people as long as they act gay in public. :)


by Chinese Democracy on 06/10/2009 03:02:31 AM EST

[ Parent ]
as long as some of them can sing and dance like Judy Garland.  I'm tellin' ya, I saw the greatest show in Atlanta one time.  I laughed all night -- and some gal (I think it was actually a guy) bought me a drink!  How cool is that!

by AnEngineer on 06/10/2009 06:27:08 AM EST

[ Parent ]
did you just say that???

Most of the participants on this board have 0.0 contact with conservatives. I fill an important role by providing the other side of the story that you would otherwise never hear.

No, most people have contact with conservatives.  Its the conservatives who shut out all other viewpoints, cover their ears, and yell LALALA as loud as they can, just so the liberal demonic antichrist satanist atheist words won't corrupt their perfect little brains.


Nobody wants gays discriminated against, not even conservatives. But we can't have flamboyant gay guys trying to put the make on fellow Marines in the heat of combat. There would be an obvious negative effect on moral.

so if the gay guys screw up, they're dead.  they know that.  They know that if they get distracted by the cute guy sitting next to them in the jeep, they might die.  And you said that nobody wants gays discriminated against, but you just made a vast generalization that all gay guys are like the effeminate ones you see in movies, and by making that generalization, you are discriminating against gays.

by birdboy1 on 06/09/2009 12:14:19 AM EST

[ Parent ]
arent protecting our freedom?

its about time to stop forcing our soldiers to hide. Let them be free to serve like anyone else.

If you thought it through, dont ask dont tell means there are already gays showering with other marines, army, navy, special forces and have been all along.

You think if don't ask don't tell where repealed tomorrow that the gays in the armed service would  suddenly hold a gay pride parade?

Your homophobia is not a good enough reason. Cite a credible study that shows gays serving openly would be detrimental to unit cohesivenes in the long run.

My cousin was in Iraq, he said when it comes right down to it. No one cares who is gay and who isn't because everyone has to look out for each other to keep them alive.

When did you serve again? You seem to know what an overwhelming majority want.


by Chinese Democracy on 06/09/2009 12:32:57 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Just because you feel that you fill a view that really is not often discussed on TYT does not mean you get all knee-jerk reactions. There is not as much name-calling toward you as there are intelligent responses. Most of my family is conservative. I have discussions with them about politics all the time. It is possible to find common ground. Just because we disagree and you are in the minority here does not mean all of are all close-minded.

by LadyFriend on 06/09/2009 11:27:30 AM EST

[ Parent ]
with your sock puppet nics?

LBJdem      5
leeberall     5


by Chinese Democracy on 06/09/2009 03:10:37 PM EST

Ken got caught rating himself?

Bwahahahaha!

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/10/2009 01:28:32 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Maybe you'd get rated higher?

Either way, nice that you admit using sockpuppets to prop yourself up.

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/11/2009 12:30:30 AM EST

[ Parent ]
So, you're deliberately trying to sabotage the integrity of The Young Turks website. Is it fair to frame it that way?

I'm pretty sure I could count all your hidden comments on my freakish, eight-fingered hand. Nobody really believes the victim scenario you are spinning here.

by OneHitKill on 06/11/2009 11:06:42 AM EST

[ Parent ]
in fact hardly any of them do.

Your problem seems to be that you don't want ANY of them to disappear. You have this notion that you should have carte blanche and be able to harras,bash, flame, post off topic stuff to derail a thread any time you want.

And now you are using sock puppets to maintain the status quo.


by Chinese Democracy on 06/11/2009 02:35:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
They aren't deleted. They're hidden. They can be seen by anyone who has the "show hidden comments" option selected. Come on, you've been computer-savvy so far. Why flake out on us now?

by OneHitKill on 06/11/2009 09:02:07 PM EST

[ Parent ]
non-trusted users don't have that option.
I just found that out recently

by birdboy1 on 06/11/2009 09:23:59 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Good to know. I learn something new about this website every day.

by OneHitKill on 06/11/2009 10:33:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I usually give a 2   I would give more but you always toss in

Democrat congress

Or Liberals hate diversity

or some crap that isnt really advancing your point.

If you would stop gay bashing and attacking people it would go a long way in your favor.

Remember Dave asked everyone to rate posts and thats what people are doing. Dont forget he can un hide posts he thinks should not have been.  If people are hiding posts just because you are conservative thats one thing he will see and put the posts back.


by Chinese Democracy on 06/11/2009 09:15:47 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Oh that's right, you're a RWnut so you'll just break the rules or cheat around them if they inconvenience you.

"I couldn't possibly give a fukk about your idea of integrity"

Yet you feel compelled to continue to post here (and pay to ensure the audience) and be ignored?

Sad.

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/12/2009 01:27:36 AM EST

[ Parent ]
that give you zero ratings. You can be ignored no matter what you do


by Chinese Democracy on 06/12/2009 09:19:41 AM EST

[ Parent ]
"You're a sock puppet yourself!"

Care to back that up?

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/15/2009 12:08:05 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Your argument seems to have devolved into:

1) Can't sway them honestly so I'll cheat.

2) Tiny does it.

Chronologically you're probably over fifty but emotionally you're stuck at 12.

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/15/2009 12:11:46 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Is that why one of the sock puppet nics you use is the same one you used to harass the shit out of him?


by Chinese Democracy on 06/11/2009 01:26:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
How many sockpuppets do you think he used before the rating system?

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/12/2009 01:36:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]
remember, ken is infallable.  He can do whatever he wants, and if you call him out on it, then you are automatically going to ken hell, where gays serve in the military and there is public health care for all.

by birdboy1 on 06/12/2009 01:41:44 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Really, you never used a sockpuppet on this board before then?

"until people started maliciously deleting every comment."

Maybe it wasn't "malicious" Maybe it was simply what your posts deserved? Funny isn't it how you are always right and everybody else is always wrong.

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/12/2009 01:34:28 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Ken created his own religion.  It's called Kenism.  followers: 1.
 The kenists believe that Ken is infallable and if you disagree with ken, you are wrong.  
dont get converted though, the Kenist priests molest little liberal children.

by birdboy1 on 06/12/2009 01:38:58 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I just thought of this - you actually log off as KenTX and log back on (maybe more than once) as a sockpuppet to rate your own posts? Then log back on as KenTX to continue posting??

Bwahahahahahha!

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 06/11/2009 12:32:29 AM EST

[ Parent ]
LBJdem      5
leeberall     5

Juarez Traveler 5
again?

Do you think that the post Im responding to is THAT important that you have to log on with different nics to try to keep it from being hidden?


by Chinese Democracy on 06/09/2009 03:15:11 PM EST

I am confused as to what you mean by that. You can see who rated comments. Not sure why this is a 'game'. I don't see anything wrong with rating a post with a 0 if that's what you think it deserves. I do zero ratings, though I try to use them as little as possible. I think I have rated a few on this thread with a zero. Do zero ratings not appear when you look at the comment ratings? What makes you think there is only one person rating comments with a zero?

by LadyFriend on 06/10/2009 12:02:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
at first I didnt like it  but  since I like TYT and Dave the moderator asked posters serveral times to start rating posts, I decided to.

Its easy to do and takes zero time

Dave sounds like he is trying to make the message board more interesting and less personal bashing and off topic stuff.

Here is a little secret . I have rated posts 4  that I dont agree with 100 percent but I thought they had a good angle and added to the ongoing discussion.


by Chinese Democracy on 06/11/2009 02:45:05 AM EST

[ Parent ]

Since when can "posse" refer to just one guy? 

When I hear the word "posse", I always think of old westerns, but I don't remember any of them where the hero was like "Let's get a posse together," and then just proceeded to change his clothes and talk in different voices to fight the bad guys.  That's a different movie entirely.  It's called The Nutty Professor II: The Klumps, and it's lame.

by Spencer on 06/11/2009 06:47:05 PM EST

[ Parent ]
i agree with you.  i don't think most of our service personel are bigots, either.  i think it's exactly like when Truman de-racified the armed forces.  the bigots can either deal with it or get out.

well, maybe it's not exactly like that.  there wasn't an actual bigotted law keeping the races separate, and Truman could just issue an order.  but Obama could stop enforcing the law.  presidents have been enforcing or not enforcing laws for political reasons since the beginning no matter what oath they took.  but this president is going to start caring about that now?

phooey!

by parplights on 06/08/2009 02:28:16 PM EST

without a doubt, the "troops" are bigots.

the voted overwhelmingly for bush/cheney in 2000 and 2004.

they continue to commit war crimes in iraq and afghanistan.

and you expect them to be tolerant of faggots? hahahaha.

by neo on 06/08/2009 09:47:03 PM EST

DADT is a dumb policy. We should allow gays to serve in the military. We should be past this...

And I read that a bunch of Greek's Spartans were companions both on and off the field of battle. They were really tough, right? Fight extra hard for their lovers?

by superdestructo on 06/11/2009 09:07:58 PM EST

Hell you think we would learn from history and get it right by now


by Chinese Democracy on 06/11/2009 09:17:05 PM EST

[ Parent ]
It was the Spartans!  But to tell the truth, I don't know why those artsy Athenians aren't just as likely to have invented it.  The did have a much better understanding of style, didn't they?  Or am I stereotyping too much?

by AnEngineer on 06/12/2009 07:13:04 AM EST

[ Parent ]
you're reinforcing "don't ask don't tell"... act straight in public but don't say your gay or act gay...  

And what's with the stereotype of gays? Do you have a problem with gay people? If someone says they're gay, they automatically get discharged... why? if nothing prevents gays from serving then why is it if you say you're gay you get a dishonorable discharge?

I just joined the Army and during my swear in or before I should say, they gave us all a briefing about if you're homosexual you will be discharged and face charges.  They NEVER mentioned heterosexual activity during the briefing which in turn I can do whatever I want. WRONG... but that's ALL they harped on during the meeting, so please explain again... "nothing prevents gays from serving..."

by Erauprcwa on 06/12/2009 01:02:24 AM EST

 Display: