Reverse Racism

Did you hear Jamie Fox at the BET Awards talking about Michael Jackson and how he belongs to the black community and he was on loan to the world for everyone to enjoy.

First and for most, like OJ was a murderer, Michael Jackson was a child molester, one of the worst crimes you can commit in this Country. You can say he was found not guilty but then so was OJ. Never the less we are celebrating his death like he was a saintly, innocent, entertainer. Just by making these comments, I could be labeled as a racist but nothing could be farther from the truth. African Americans (not all but most) have taken on an attitude that they are better than everyone else and they can do no wrong. We have bent over backwards to get passed our ugly racist past. It is the attitudes and comments (Jamie Fox BET Awards) of the average African American that serves to further divide this Country. Jamie's Comments
http://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=eNjAjhk99JY

We would never say things like that at the WET awards. Oh wait...we dont have White Entertainment Television Awards, that would be racist...........Well we would never say things like that during White history month......Oh wait ..don't have that either...too racist. Its not that i want these things, however, there is such a double standard and I am sick of hearing it and seeing it!!!
< republicans and democrats | The Washington Post Sells Out >
 Display:
I thought the Emmys were the White Entertainment Television Awards.

by OneHitKill on 07/02/2009 10:23:30 AM EST

First of all as far as Jamie Fox is concerned, he is an oughtright racist( "Mily Cyrus is a little white bitch"?!) and Michael Jackson 1) does not belong to the black race, he belongs to America because this is his place of birth, education, and where he grew up and 2) Michael Jackson is NOT a child molester, he is the exact opposite! He loved children, treating them exactly the way he longed to be treated when he was a child and did not get it. Can you possibly imagine the stress on him as a little kid having to learn all those songs and dance moves and then perform them almost on a daily basis for years?! He had no childhood whats so ever! The molestation claim was for nothing but the money...at least that is what I believe, as well as him being one of the greatest enterta.iners of all time. He was a human miracle and we need more like him as we are dying fast!

by bigdave on 07/06/2009 12:10:12 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I congratulate you, bigdave.  That was -- at long last -- an interesting post.

Yes, Jamie Fox's comment was racist.  While Mily Cyrus may be a little bitch, there was no need to refer to her race.  However, Michael Jackson was black, and he didn't and doesn't belong to anyone.  He belonged to himself, as do all of us.

I'm willing to believe that Jackson wasn't a child molester.  I don't know.  Your description of him seems as likely as the other, but he was found not guilty, and I don't have any facts to disagree with it.  So I've got to let it go, even if I felt a little creeped out by him.

But I draw the line at calling him a "miracle".  He was a very troubled person who was taken advantage of by everyone around him, and he might have deserved our pity.  And he certainly had an extraordinary talent.  But I don't think he was any more of a miracle than the sunrise is.

by EveningStarNM on 07/06/2009 04:07:15 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Now of course, even raising the question among this crowd will forever brand you a racist, but you are absolutely correct, and that's what will make you hated here at TYT and other such places... I'm sick of it as well, but I'm white taxpaying male, so what I think doesn't count. :)

by bobo1 on 07/02/2009 10:36:09 AM EST

That is, of course, total bs. Here at TYT you won't be dismissed because of controversial POVs, but certainly for constantly ruminating RW talking points which often are fascistic and racist.

But you are absolutely correct about your opinion not counting because you are a white tax paying male sucker! Only the opinions of white tax avoiding moguls or their proxies do count. But mostly in the eyes of you suckers anyway... You are a funny bunch because you oppress yourself and lay the blame on the people worse off than yourself.

by eborujion on 07/02/2009 11:11:58 AM EST

[ Parent ]
So what your saying is that you are blind, ingnorant & racist. That's lovely. Bless your heart.....

by elove20202003 on 07/09/2009 12:38:47 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Me? How would you come up with that? Seriously, please tell me!

by eborujion on 07/09/2009 04:02:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]
to a certain extent. To me Jackson was an entertainer and musician first, but a child-molesting pathetic freak as a very close second (what actually bothered me, was the leeway he was given because he was a superstar, same as OJ). So the two go together and I found the commentary by Cenk refreshingly honest in that regard. Yeah, of course, it was not entirely (or even mostly) his fault, bad childhood, media abuse, etc., but I must assume that he had the means to get himself helped.

But I also do not like  the idea that he is posthumously abused as a racial icon, because that's not who he was or wanted to be. I don't want to speculate too much about his racial sense of belonging but my feeling is that he really loathed himself for being black.

So now when black artists (or politicians etc) want him to be a symbol for African American identity it strikes me as very wrong. If NAMBLA did that, I could understand.

Well, the other things you talk about like special African American Awards or Black History Month, I very much disagree with you. As long as there is racial discrimination and unequality, such events are a necessity to raise an awareness of the issue to the (ignorant or oblivious or in parts racist) general public to try and change the disparity. Of course in that sense WET and White History Month would not make much sense, because they are the dominating "culture" and as such pretty much the non-labeled events are theirs by default (if there is no conscious effort to include minorities, aka affirmative action). Just wait 50 years and you can put white and black history month together to counteract the oppressing nature of the dominating latino culture (jk, or am I?).

On a sidenote: I was amazed when I first payed attention to the Academy Awards and discovered that so few African Americans have been honored so far. Are there Black Oscars yet? Well, there should be, then!

by eborujion on 07/02/2009 11:46:45 AM EST

"such events are a necessity to raise an awareness of the issue to the (ignorant or oblivious or in parts racist) general public to try and change the disparity."


My god, man - WE HAVE A BLACK PRESIDENT!!!!!! How can you raise awareness of being black any higher than that?

Its pure racism itself that drives "Black History Month" and "Black" awards shows - the need for the African American to seperate themselves and attempt to feel more important than their surrounding culture is what creates and widens the divide between races...

Its amazing how well intentioned Liberals can look the other way when the obvious truth is staring and screaming at them right to their faces...

 :(

by bobo1 on 07/02/2009 12:17:10 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"Its pure racism itself that drives "Black History Month" and "Black" awards shows - the need for the African American to seperate themselves and attempt to feel more important than their surrounding culture is what creates and widens the divide between races...

Its amazing how well intentioned Liberals can look the other way when the obvious truth is staring and screaming at them right to their faces..."

You realize that Blacks were basically shut out of the media, or forced into stereotyped roles up until the late 70's early 80's, not to mention EVERY month besides February is white history month?  Granted, we have come a long way since the 60's, but to say that BET is "racist" because it exists just completely ignores the past 40 years of this country's existence.  It's not a need to "seperate ourselves", it's a need to make ourselves aware.  You might not realize this, but many blacks don't get any black history because they go to schools that don't see black contributions to American history as being legitimate enough to put into the curriculum.  We have a MIXED RACE president, and this just shows that the 1/32 rule is still in people's minds.  I don't personally think that Black history month is even really observed except in elementary and middle schools, so what are you crying about?  As far as Jamie foxx's comment, people have been making black/white jokes about MJ for years, and NOW people want to say it's "reverse racist".  There's no such thing as "reverse racism", there's just racism.  Any race can be "racist".  

Why don't we need "WET": because almost every channel caters to the 18-24 white male demographic already.  Are you that unaware of the media?  I think it's funny how people want to claim that "electing a black man" has shown that we are over racism, when his election was used as an enrollment tool for the kkk, not to mention all the crazies that came out for McCain rallies talking about "kill him", and "he's a muzlin" and all that.  It's not that ALL America is racist, but to deny that America has a large racist demographic is just ignorant.  I am not saying they are all white either, as some of the most racist people in America are old black men who lived through the 60's.  They're not "reverse" racists, they're just plain racist.  Clearly "elove" has a more optomistic view of the state of America, but unfortunately that view is wrong.  Notice, I called NO ONE RACIST in this post.

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/02/2009 12:59:11 PM EST

[ Parent ]
We have had this discussion before, but I believe that we agree on the source and agree on the problem, its just a matter of perspective that divides us...

I see things like "Black History Month" and "Black" awards shows not as a source of empowerment and retribution for the years of oppression, rather I see them as a way that blacks keep themselves seperate from this overwhelming white culture you allude to... Its a way for them to have their cake and eat it to.

I want you to imagine what your feelings, as an African American, if the situation were reversed. I want you to imagine flipping the channels to find the "Ivory" awards that excluded other races from their ranks... I want you to imagine having a "White History Month" taught at your childrens schools, smattered all over the TV and Video stations and grilled down your throat everytime you turn on your computer... Of course, these things are absurd to imagine and non sensical to believe, but this is the reality right now when it comes to "Black" awards and Black history... Why is it any less absurd to think of the situation as it is now?

For example, CNN produced a show a while back called "Black in America". Now they are coming out with "Black in America 2" - Where's "White in America", Chris? Where's the equality? Why is it any less insensitive to people who look like me to always have this in the media?

I dont like this seperation any more than you do Chris - I am a firm believer in the ideals of Dr. King and "The Dream" that he had. Dr. king didd not want Black history Month. Dr. King did not want the Ebony or Essence or Jet awards. Dr. king wanted all of us to be UNITED under one banner, children playing together and being unified, not seperated and building hate by purposefully segregating their thoughts and beliefs...

How else can one make themselves aware of what they are, Chris? Michael Jackson said it best in "Man in the Mirror" - Just take a look at yourself and then make the change... You dont need BET to know who you are, just like I wouldnt need WET to know who I am...

Blacks who support this stuff need to get over themselves... We all need to get over this stuff, really...
this absurdity must end or it will consume us, Chris...

:)





by bobo1 on 07/02/2009 02:45:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Where's "White in America", Chris? Where's the equality?

Really, Bobo?  REALLY? You can't be serious. Would you watch a show called "White in America?" I wouldn't. That sounds like the worst show ever. It sounds like a reality show starring a guy named Bobo who sits around the house in his whitey-tighties (oops, was that racist? Okay, his "honky-tighties"), blaming his alcohol addiction, his inability to find work and his marriage troubles all on some other ethnic group. It's unpleasant even to think about that show.

Cancelled.

by OneHitKill on 07/02/2009 10:53:26 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I can't believe I'm agreeing with Eveningstar here, but we should strive to be colorblind, and these types of shows are the antithesis of that... :)

by bobo1 on 07/03/2009 11:35:42 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I can't believe I'm agreeing with Eveningstar here, but we should strive to be colorblind

If that's what you both think, then you're both wrong. Colorblindness is not the opposite of racism, nor is it a realistic expectation. Anybody who claims not to perceive another's race when looking at them is lying. But you can acknowledge race without using that perception alone to formulate opinions about others, and THAT is what we should be striving for.

So pardon me for pointing out that your own arguments cancel each other out. Saying "We should be colorblind" in the same breath as saying "The BET awards are racist, I want my WET Awards, WHERE'S THE EQUALITY?" is, in total, just the same as staying mute.

by OneHitKill on 07/03/2009 07:11:55 PM EST

[ Parent ]
We can achieve that.  But I enjoy looking at a crowd of people of many races -- I like the variety of colors we come in.

by EveningStarNM on 07/06/2009 04:13:07 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I'm just talking about colorblindness in the law

Then you are correct. I feel like some others' idea of "equality" is pretending that all races are identical; that's nothing but a recipe for misunderstanding and further hardship.

by OneHitKill on 07/06/2009 10:24:45 AM EST

[ Parent ]
comment, eveningstar...it's perfect...

by opiman000 on 07/13/2009 01:55:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
One hit you just dont get it! No one here wants WET awards..We just don't want the BET awards either. You have no argument. Its redundant, pointless, you are talking just to talk. Find another blog where your points will make sense........

by elove20202003 on 10/17/2009 07:24:36 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Uh, dude, that post you are debating is like 3 1/2 months old.

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 10/17/2009 09:41:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]
they will be the antithesis of that, but not now.  I definitely see your guys' point, but I think it's leaving out some integral steps that we are currently going through.  The transition phase is NOW, so these types of shows WERE designed to empower blacks, and recognize them when white America tried to denigrate them...but now that the youth of white america are totally embracing black culture, it IS time to start phasing these things out...at the same time, the people who lived through jim crow are still alive on both sides, so racism is not just going to "disappear".

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/03/2009 11:39:59 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Maybe its because I work with middle schoolers all day, but it seems to me that we are just innundated with "Black Culture" and I just have to wonder when enough is too much - I mean, really, give up the ghosts of the distant past and move forward... :)

by bobo1 on 07/03/2009 11:46:12 AM EST

[ Parent ]
is that it's "hip hop culture" not "black culture" that you're being inundated with.  You have to understand, the white youth like rap music the same as black youth, so THEY are assimilating to hip hop culture, not vice versa.  You keep saying "move forward", but when the blacks move forward by giving themselves awards when whites don't, you say they are "seperating themselves".  I don't think you really know what you want, except for young white kids to stop "acting black".  That's what it sounds like to me, correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not trying to be facetious.

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/03/2009 12:06:23 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Why do blacks need to give each other awards? To recognize that they in fact are black? If white people did this, there would be riots and cries of racism. So why are blacks allowed to do it openly and on broadcast TV? - And "Hip Hop" IS black culture! Don't play semantic games, just like your whole Kenyan/African deal - They are one in the same... Maybe you don't want them to be the same, but sorry, they are... As to your point about the school age kids acting black, I don't personally care which path they choose to live their lives on - I just want blacks to stop seperating and segregating themselves from the rest of us whilst crying "racism" all the time - you cannot have your cake and eat it too... :)

by bobo1 on 07/03/2009 12:36:12 PM EST

[ Parent ]
just like your whole Kenyan/African deal - They are one in the same.

You ignorant, racist POS! They are the same just like Africa is country with a homogenous culture, right?

There are different "black" ethnicities who are genetically further away from each other than from ALL white people! But I guess, in your opinion they are all the same because they are darker than you.

I can't believe how stupid you are and yet how self-righteous... Dangerous mixture. I can't believe you really manage to add more stupid to your resume every time you post here.

by eborujion on 07/03/2009 01:15:27 PM EST

[ Parent ]
you can't say "it's semantics", and then say at the same time that they are the same.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik i/Semantics

You acknowledging itself that it's "semantics" means that they are in fact NOT the same.  

Here's a clip of "Gary Owen", a "white guy" who got his start on BET.

http://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=Ev5YOqrjWEg

He'll explain his trailer park roots himself.  BET is not "exclusive", and plays white artists music, and comedy, as that is entertaing to black people as well, thus, it's on "Black Entertainment Television".  You're painting BET as "exclusive" against whites because it has "Black" in the title, when you're misrepresenting WHY "black" is in the title.

You tell me why I have red hair, and am the same as a person from Ghana with black hair.  I suppose this is the same reason the earth is 6,000 years old right?  If you want to go down the genetics road, you have to acknowledge that African genetics are the MOST varied on the planet from each other, not the same.  

BTW, it's not the "Black Guy Awards".  

And the award for "blackest guy" goes to-(fill in stereotype 'Dakwon', 'Lashawn','Kiki' name)

Nobody just hands out awards for being black.

This is a strawman argument, as BET is not exclusionary towards whites.  The "black awards" shows are REALLY meaningless, except for the black community to make sure that it's stars get recognized in SOME fashion, as they cannot rely on the MSM to do it for them.  To get all pissed about the awards shows, means that you're REALLY pissed about the black achievements, because the awards really are nothing but a piece of metal, and 30 seconds on tv.  You're REALLY mad about that, or is it that other thing where white kids are emulating "hip hop" icons like "Eminem", "El-P", "Sage Francis", "Eyedea", "Atmosphere", "Brother Ali"?  You can't really call Eminem a "Black Icon" can you?  Unless I am in a bizarro world where Eminem is black?

Chris

Chris

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/03/2009 04:23:29 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Amen to your comment brotha.... You are 100% Dead on Correct here........Elove

by elove20202003 on 07/09/2009 12:41:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
So what is your problem now? You accuse me of racism and then go on to agree with the only self-confessed and proud racist in this forum?

by eborujion on 07/09/2009 04:05:52 PM EST

[ Parent ]
eborujion if whites had a WET channel would you call it racist? I would bet yes. It whites had White awards show, and ACTUALLY called it a White Awards show would you call it racist? I again would bet yes. Same goes for White History Month, again by your own statements I know you would say that is racist......So what is the difference. Why the double standard. There should not even be an argument here.

by elove20202003 on 07/13/2009 12:52:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Yeah, of course WET would be racist, as BET would be in another CONTEXT, that is, if African Americans dominated the culture and whites got discriminated against on a daily basis. Such events are a necessity as long as there is actual discrimination and factual segregation to raise awareness of the issue in the minds of the mainstream (=whites).

Many people here argue against BET and BHM and I believe them that they are not racist but I also that they do not fully grasp how it must be for an African American to be repeatedly confronted with underlying racism and rejection throughout their entire life! Not to mention the people who are STILL real racists, openly so or hidden.

So you ask: "Why the double standard?" The answer is a question: "Why still the double standard in the treatment of different races in society in general?"

by eborujion on 07/14/2009 08:29:05 AM EST

[ Parent ]

There is no need for  white  tele channel MOST channels where  already  whites only  for the most part for years.

The world is changing  I dont think you and pat buchanan get it

... Four states are majority-minority as of 2009: Hawaii (which is the only state that has never had a white majority), New Mexico, California, and Texas[1].
,,.The percentage of non-Hispanic white residents has fallen below 60 percent in Maryland, Georgia and Nevada, Arizona, New York, and Mississippi.[2].
...The District of Columbia reached a majority black status during the latter stages of the Great Migration.
..All major United States territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa) are majority-minority areas.
... 7 of the 40 largest metropolitan areas in the U.S. are majority-nonwhite.

Guess what
There is a black president
and there is going to be a hispanic woman on the supreme court.

and you are worried about an  awards show?

if whites where in the same situation as blacks then a white awards show would make sense

Or if gays where in the same position then a gay awards show

Or if Hispanics where in the same position  then a latin awards show

getting the concept?

:)

A conservative believes nothing should be done for the first time

by C D on 08/02/2009 03:44:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Just asking...cause 'elove' looks familiar to me...and I'm kinda new...not up with all the posters...

But I do YouTube...and 'elove' conjurs up memories of some republican-ish poster there...

Just curious...

by opiman000 on 07/13/2009 01:34:24 PM EST

[ Parent ]
to UID he/she is very new. Don't let the paranoia regarding sock puppets get to you, opi ;). As far as I am concerned, if someone does not openly say he/she is also another account, I don't speculate (with the exception of Kentroll here in the TYT-Forum, he is painfully obvious). I guess that is the difference of real person and internet persona, you can have more than one of the latter (though I am not condoning it).

by eborujion on 07/14/2009 08:34:54 AM EST

[ Parent ]
i am replying to you rather late i see...i haven't figured out a system to make sure i check my replies...i guess my recognition of elove comes from youtube...and yah...i will take him at face value.

by opiman000 on 08/02/2009 01:17:57 PM EST

[ Parent ]

The ellipsis, the random punctuation, the racism.

Could this be bobo's first attempt at a sock puppet?  Either that or it's Hulk Hogan.  Amen, brotha!

by Spencer on 07/09/2009 06:55:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Blacks weren't even allowed to play Blacks in the movies. They were portrayed by white actors in "Blackface".

Even after they were allowed to act in movies in the 30's and 40's, there was a separate film industry for "race movies" made for black audiences because blacks still weren't allowed in the "white folks" theatre.  Hmmm, do you think Black folks were the perpetrators of segregation? No, they weren't.

It wasn't until the 50's that it was socially acceptable (by whites again) for whites and blacks to actually act in the same films together! Oh, the horror! Whites and Blacks actually acting alongside each other???

Based on all this history, is it a surprise that a Black Actor didn't win the Academy Award until 1963? So, essentially, the Academy Awards were basically white people giving white people awards for the first 36 years!

I am white and watch the BET awards and don't have a problem with it. Bobo, you have a big old chip on your shoulder. It's so easy for you to cry out at perceived injustice against the poor old white guy. Give me a break!

by ilovecenk99 on 08/02/2009 06:19:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
...whites to give themselves awards for being white?

If not, then why is it okay for blacks to give themselves awards for being black?

by EveningStarNM on 07/03/2009 12:45:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Sorry, ES, I think, you are wrong here. They don't give themselves awards for being black, they award themselves because they feel neglected by the mainstream and or because they think the competition is tainted by racial considerations. If that feeling relates to real discrimination (in the Entertainment business that is) is another thing but I think as long as there is real tangible discrimination in general society there should be compensation of some kind to some extent.

I am not black, so I cannot speak for African Americans but that is my opinion.

by eborujion on 07/03/2009 01:29:23 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Saying that people with black skin feel neglected by mainstream organizations and that their cause, therefore, demands special attention is a powerful and compelling argument because they have been neglected.

From there, we have two options: either we can fix the current system or set up a separate one for blacks.

What is at the logical end of that path?

by EveningStarNM on 07/03/2009 04:58:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]
the logical end to me is a point at which the debate happens where someone asks BET executives if they really feel the "black entertainment awards" are necessary anymore.  If we have reached the positive "end", the executives will say,"you know what, maybe it is time we stopped calling the show the "black entertainment awards", and started calling it the "Artist recognition awards" and we'll recognize other artists as well, because other award shows have integrated minorities into their pools.  That could very well happen, especially if people like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson get on BET's case.  Remember, they tried VERY hard to get the young black community to stop using the word nigger(although they failed), so it's not like black leaders won't take the black community to task when they deserve it.  I don't see the path ever coming to an "end" however, so I think one day all of a sudden, race relations will be something of the past because our genetics will be too complex.  Not in our lifetime though.

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/03/2009 08:09:17 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Thanks.  And that's all I'm trying to do is to start the debate.  Believe me, I have no expectation that the changes that I've proposed will happen even in my lifetime -- and I am sad about that, because it means that racism will continue to plague us for a long, long time.

But as long as we're asking these kinds of questions and considering the possibilities even as unrealistic as they currently may be, then we're making progress.  I don't demand that we immediately stop Black History Month and anyone who disagrees with me is immoral.  I just want to stop considering skin color in all of our affairs.

Eventually.  (Oh, did I forget to use that word before?  My bad.)

That's all we can really hope or ask for: progress, not perfection.

by EveningStarNM on 07/03/2009 08:38:05 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Absolutely.  And during this phase, we'll take a few steps this way and a few steps that way, doing a drunkard's walk until we finally-almost-accidentally reach our ultimate destination, wherever that may be.

I just want to push us in one direction as much as I can.

by EveningStarNM on 07/03/2009 12:43:41 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"I want you to imagine flipping the channels to find the "Ivory" awards"

You mean the oscars?

http://findarticles.com/p/a rticles/mi_m1077/is_6_55/ai _61619022/

"I want you to imagine having a "White History Month" taught at your childrens schools,"

you mean every month?

I found "white in america", but it wasn't produced by cnn.

http://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=ReShmRYggIY

Dr. King did not want black history month, i will concede that, but Dr. King did not want to have to sit at the back of the bus either.  It's one thing to say that we will "achieve the dream", but unfortunately things like BET, and affirmative action were the necessary steps to get to a more integrated society.  You think white kids don't watch BET?  My white friends watch BET more than I do.  You think BET means that white people can't watch it?  You're misunderstanding the point of the channel.  BET often features white comedians, and latinos.  George lopez got his career started on BET.  BET is about promoting black culture (albeit negatively most of the time), because many other networks and stations don't.  The only reason blacks are big on MTV is because black music has been a huge part of American culture.  Hell, even MSNBC only has blacks as "support crew".  I'm not complaining about blacks' situation, rather I'm trying to get across to you that black culture isn't something that we can "absolve ourselves of" to become more American.  Black culture IS american, and it's something that doesn't HAVE to seperate us, but the miscommunication and misperceptions cause bitterness and resentment on both sides.  What you don't get is that many black people like things that you can't find on Fox, Disney channel, or Mtv for that matter.  BET fills this demographic's need.  Honestly, you think if you started "WET", you wouldn't be able to sell it?  I think people are just afraid to do WET, because it would inherently look racist.  You think BET didn't have the same fear?  They just got over it, and Robert Johnson proceeded to exploit black America like disney exploits white children.  In all honesty, I hate BET, but it's for glorifying the gangsta rap image, NOT for being BET.  

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/02/2009 03:54:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
but i have to say that to get to the vision of MLK, we arent gonna get there by seperation by segregating award shows and channels, months and etc, we will get there by bieng inclusive.  Adding more black history into the yearly education curriculum, not relogating it to one moth of the year... honoroing americans year round, reguardless of their color, not seperating them to one month.

The lack of it does not advocate the need for it, black history month should be abolished, otherwise wed need a white history month a asian history month a native american, ethiopian, pakistani ... etc ...etc..

While i read what your saying and agree that there needs change.   But what the black culture is doing, IS seperating itself... instead of bieng inclusive.  

THere are tv stations that cater to black people more but dont have a "black entertainment telivision" name... warnerbrothers network has been running a HUGE line of black themed shows

there are ways to bring these issues to the forefront, but seperating yourselves by color = your segregating yourselves.

My views on it.... at least.

by Ectheleon on 07/02/2009 04:25:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Etchelon: "black history month should be abolished, otherwise wed need a white history month a asian history month a native american, ethiopian, pakistani ... etc ...etc.."

Correction Time:

March - National Women's History Month

May - Asian Pacific American Heritage Month

May - Older Americans Month

June - Gay Lesbian Pride Month

September - National Hispanic-Latino Heritage Month

October - National Disability Employment Awareness Month

November - National Native American Indian Heritage Month

and in 2008, after House Approval, Pres George Bush proclaimed that May is also National Jewish Heritage Month..

Based on these inconvenient FACTS, do you still want to abolish Black History Month, Etchy??

by ilovecenk99 on 08/02/2009 07:21:45 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Fox news doesn't exclude blacks - Juan Williams is black, Thomas Sowell is black... The Oscars don't exclude blacks - Denzel Washington, Forrest Whitaker, Halle Berry are all black... TV DEFINITELY doesn't exclude blacks - Cosby, Fresh Prince, Bernie Mac, All the anchors on CNN except AC and Cafferty, UPN, WB, BET, MTV, CW - lots of blacks on TV. In fact for only being 12% of the total US population, I think there is an overrepresentation of blacks on TV... Music - most of the best performers are black or co-opted black style music...Hip Hop, Rap, R&B are some of the largest revenue generators for the music industry... Politics? Black President - and BTW Chris, Mixed/Multi racial or not, he's black... We agree with each other on a lot of things, Chris - and we disagree on a lot of things, and I hope you understand that I'm not trying to be testy with you, but seriously - YOU NEED TO GET THE CHIP OFF OF YOUR SHOULDER!!!! You have not been oppressed. You have not been burned out of your house. You have not wore the chains as your ancestors have coming across the great ocean - Get over yourself... :)

by bobo1 on 07/02/2009 04:38:24 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I'm not the one who made the post in the first place.  Personally, I think black history month SHOULD be abolished, but not because whites aren't being represented.  You're playing the "opressed white" card as if whites have REALLY been oppressed by blacks somehow creating BET.  I didn't say fox "EXCLUDED BLACKS", i said it was WHITE ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION.  Look at the demographics of fox news and call me a liar.  BTW, there is a HUGE difference between "Kenyan", and Black-American.  Don't conflate "black" with "kenyan American", because those are two completely different ethnicities, and to conflate them shows your desire for ignorance of these things.  I never claimed to be "oppressed", and if anything I was talking about how blacks have overcome the trials of a racist america to try and INTEGRATE ourselves with the others, but you chose to see it as "a chip on my shoulder".  You can't use belief to change my argument.  I personally didn't have "slave" ancestors on my father's side, and don't have a clue on my mother's side.  You don't have a clue about my heritage, and assume a lot about my statements based on a preconcieved notion about "black anger".  I don't HAVE it, I understand it.  It's called EMPATHY Bobo, and Obama has it to.  You want to seperate whites and blacks, but don't see the difference between a Kenyan American, and an African American.  They are apparently both "black" to you.  You said it.  I am not an egotistical person, so I will take the "get over yourself" comment as a snide swipe at my defense of black culture.  But as I've said before, i don't really care what anyone thinks of me personally.  I respect people, and hopefully I get it back.  But do I really care...No.  I don't offend people for no reason.  Now bobo, be careful about who you say has a chip on their shoulder, because I was one of the first people to declare a war against the flagrant use of the term "racist" around here.  I don't like it anymore than you.  I'm choosing to ignore a lot of the things you said, as a gesture.

Chris  

by chrisandyasemin on 07/02/2009 05:49:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Ignore him for the most part anyway, except when you feel like making a point for the benefit of the rest of us to hear. Bobo is the biggest troll around here.

by ilovecenk99 on 08/02/2009 06:22:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
So, one guy getting the opportunity to be President makes up for hundreds of years of oppression and discrimination. I would say that unless no one would notice (or comment on it) until after an election what "race" someone belongs to, then there is a reason for concern. But I will give you that. Maybe the election of the first black President amends all of America's racialist history. But how does that change today's racial discrimination and disparities for African Americans and other minorities? It was a fear of the cons that Obama would hand out packs of money in the hoods to his bruthas, was it? Well, he should have done it, but he didn't! Members of minorities in the U.S. on average are way worse off than white Americans.

But anyhow... One decisive point anuls your argument entirely. O'bama is not an African American black man! So how would he affect African Americans at all?

by eborujion on 07/02/2009 01:21:50 PM EST

[ Parent ]

I'm a Black man, and I feel sorry for you.  Are a lot of Black people racist? Sure.  There are racists in every ethnic group.  Unfortunately, it is a pandemic trait at the level of human development where our species currently stands.  Is there often an unfair standard applied to Whites as opposed to Blacks in terms of what is acceptable to say at times? Yes.  Do efforts to overcome racial inequities occasionally overreach and unfairly impact Whites? Yes.  Are Whites sometimes accused of racism when such a charge is not justified? Yes.

But you White guys feeling sorry for yourselves, I feel sorry for you.  I feel sorry for you, because you are so depressed, your self-esteem is so low, your own personal sense of self-worth so lacking, that you can't see the fact that YOU RUN THE FREAKING WORLD!  The overwhelming majority of the people on this planet with any significant wealth or power are white males.  But yet, some of you guys, who enjoy so much privilege as a group, can only bitch and moan and remain obsessed with the few rare instances where privilege benefited someone NOT white.  Success is never guaranteed in life for anyone, but if you are an American white male, you have, on average, more chances than anyone else in the WORLD to get it right, more opportunities to succeed than anyone.  You can't see all the thousands of doors that being White opens for you in life--instead you're fixated watching for any door that opens for a minority so you can complain about why you can't go through THAT door.  Every time a Black person has any success or privilege, it burns you up.  But you're blind to the MILLIONS of white males that enjoy success and privilege every day in America and around the world.  You need to open your eyes and broaden your scope.

You're obsessed with OJ and Michael Jackson because you believe they got away with crimes, but yet you seem not to care at all about the fact that thousands of Black men around the country are wrongly imprisoned for crimes they DIDN'T commit.  You're obsessed with OJ for 15 years now, and steam comes out of your ears every time his name is mentioned, but you NEVER mention Robert Blake, or any of the dozens of rich White guys that have gotten away with murdering their spouses over the history of this country.  OJ is infamous to you you, but I'll give you $10 if you can name the white guys who murdered Emmitt Till and got away with it without looking it up.  How many lynchings were successfully prosecuted in American history? Not many.

And please stop telling me about America's racist PAST.  America has a racist PRESENT.  We've made a ton of progress, everyone who is reasonable recognizes that, but minorities in America are still impacted by racism and prejudice every day.  It's far better than it was, but if you think it no longer exists, you need to go to the Black neighborhood in your town and sit down and talk to some people about their life experiences.  These days, the disadvantages may arise more often from systemic things rather than deliberate hateful things, but they are still present.

So I'm not going to call you racist.  I'm going to call you myopic.  You need to take a broader look at the world instead of just focusing on a small group of things that you feel are unfair, or on the small group of situations where possibly, Blacks are privileged more than Whites.  Look at the big picture.  Which would you rather have? The right to tell dumb jokes like Jamie Foxx or 43 of the 44 presidents?  Which would you rather have? One weird screwed up entertainer who maybe molested children but yet is still worshipped after dying at 50, or 490 out of the Fortune 500 CEOs? Stop feeling sorry for yourself.  As an American White male, you are the most privileged creature on the planet.  I know, that doesn't mean your life is easy. That doesn't mean you have it made.  But the problems and frustrations you have are multiplied for everyone outside your group.

And as a final note, it cracks me up that right-wing types (and honestly a lot of left-wing people too) who are so "rah rah America" reject the basic foundation of the American legal system, innocent until proven guilty, any time someone who they have concluded was guilty based on evidence gathered from our sensationalist news media.  Do I think OJ was guilty? Yes.  Do I think Michael Jackson was guilty? Maybe.  But its just funny to me how so many people in America now basically have a presumption of GUILT when someone is accused of a crime, and don't respect the legal process unless it yields the same conclusion that they reached from the evidence they gathered from their diligent investigations of watching television.  So when OJ gets off, when Michael Jackson gets off, there is outrage.  But when you want to talk to these same outraged people about people who are wrongly incarcerated, their attitude suddenly changes to "Oh no, there is no significant number of innocent people in prison.  The justice system always works".

 

 

by mdavidboyd on 07/02/2009 12:40:39 PM EST

"I'm a Black man, and I feel sorry for you.  Are a lot of Black people racist? Sure.  There are racists in every ethnic group.  Unfortunately, it is a pandemic trait at the level of human development where our species currently stands.  Is there often an unfair standard applied to Whites as opposed to Blacks in terms of what is acceptable to say at times? Yes.  Do efforts to overcome racial inequities occasionally overreach and unfairly impact Whites? Yes.  Are Whites sometimes accused of racism when such a charge is not justified? Yes."

I love what you say there because that's what I believe. Everyone is racist, its human nature to stereotype and to group people together, and to form opinions on groups for better or for worse. But its through logic that we can guide that natural tendency for something good or at the very least not destructive. The problem I have with racism in today's world is that minorities don't see the hypocrisy in their actions. That whites who say something maliciously racist is rightfully shunned, but when a similar act is done from a minority towards a white person, its the white person who shouldn't feel sorry for himself? The double standard is real and should not be underestimated. Racism is racism.

I'm a mutt, but half of me is white and when I was a kid had blond hair (looked uber white). Ive never had a white friend though cause there weren't any around where I live so I naturally made friends with who was around. But I think I was able to gain a genuinely honest perspective to how minorites react to a "white boy". Long story short, when I read a book like black like me, or watch a movies about the civil rights era where life was hard and whites were malicious, I can identify with it. No, I never feared getting strung up or went through anything as extream as African Americans did back then, but I can guarantee that Ive experienced more racism on a consistent basis from various minorities that all my friends ever have, black , hispanic, Flip, or whatever combined.

So this idea that reverse racism issue isn't real or shouldn't be honestly talked about is IMO weak sauce. Its not a matter of whites feeling sorry for anyone, its about addressing the hypocrisy of how we react to racism today which is usually in a racist way. I have a dream of a better world than that.

by Smokin on 07/02/2009 02:11:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]

You said...

"The problem I have with racism in today's world is that minorities don't see the hypocrisy in their actions."

That's your problem with racism today?

Not the kids being thrown out of the pool...not the american system of codified slavery (i.e.the penal system), not the hundreds of comments I alone hear everyday on the factory floor from whites, such as "n" word and so forth...oh no...for you, that is all in the past? or not so concerning?

Your biggest issue with racism is the minorities inability to see their own hypocrisy?

Oy vey...

If I didn't know any better, and I don't, you are beginning to sound like one of those whites I am racialist against. You strike me as a white who under their breath, and in 'certain' company, will 'let er rip' when it comes to your own racialist views...

You have the backdoor, back way in, yes...underground...way of being a racialist...seriously dude...I just have that feeling...

Let the chips fall...

by opiman000 on 07/13/2009 01:48:36 PM EST

[ Parent ]
if you are black...or a person of colour...please, please explain to me how you can have this attitude...

by opiman000 on 07/13/2009 01:50:14 PM EST

[ Parent ]
When someone loses power as has happened to whites as they've had to yield to the rights of other races, they sometimes want to feel sorry for themselves and see themselves as victims.  Therefore it's helpful to them to focus on the flaws of their made-up "oppressors" rather than on the real issues and their own flaws.

Abused children are less important to some than their own loss of prestige.  Smokin' was definitely focusing on a side issue.

Still, racism is not merely a whites-only problem.

by EveningStarNM on 07/13/2009 04:47:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]
-During a middle school football game

-Walking down the street in college

-In casual conversation with a middle school classmate

Give up?

All places I've been called a nigger in an unprovoked manner, and times I did not respond in anger or violence.  I am 26 years old, you do the math.  Does that sound like racism is dead to you?  Do I hate white people because of this?  HELL NO.  Do I blame ALL white people for racism?  HELL NO.  My point is, racism however ugly it may be, and however much you may not want to admit is alive and well, is DEFINITELY still around.  What about the holocaust museum shooting...You're just being inflammatory with this post.

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/02/2009 01:18:30 PM EST

The area was 95% black, i was jumped to and FROM school, simply for bieng white in a black area, asked why im going to a "black school" when i should be going to  a private school.

Racism is alive in ALL colors/people.

Ive been told to get out of a store cause im a "gringo" at a Hispanic corner store,   Ive been refused service at a black Deli.

when i was 13 i got into a fight outside the front of my house with my neighbor, he was black, the fight started cause he shoved my little brother for listening to rap music with a friend of his.   I got into it with him for it... and i beat his ass.   Thats not the issue,  after we finished fighting, he held his hands up and I backed off, the fight was over... less than 5 seconds later his mother who had been watching, came out, angrily took him by his ear and dragged him back into their house, cursing and stuttering and i quote "how dare you get your ass beaten by a white boy"   

Later i found out that she was teased cause her son lost to me by OTHER familys.

we moved out of that area later that year and since then my only experience with black racism was when i was 21 i was delivering furniture and it was lunch time, so me and kevin (The driver of our truck, i built furniture didnt usually do deliveries but they were short handed so i had to go out on the truck) stopped at a black deli to get lunch,  he got to the counter ordered his lunch... i was next in line, the Guy taking orders asked the black man behind me what he wanted,  i let that go... then he asked the guy behind him... i said "excuse me i was next in line" he asked if i was lost...   Kevin said i was cool that i was with him, the man said "i dont care take him somewhere else"...

Thats what is REALLY going on nowadays, i dont deny racism by whites... but when we only talk about white racism we miss SO MUCH of the conversation.

Racism is wrong on all sides, and to seperate ourselves iwth tv channels and Months etc only serves to go against MLK's dream.   WE need to be inclusive not derissive.

i give the example of the 6 black boys that almost killed a white classmate,  they basically got off with what amounted to attempted murder  and a hate crime, why? cause the black community stood up and said that they were getting harsh treatment cause they were black.

WHen in truth 6 boys almost murdered a classmate.   Now does this mean anything?  not really..  there have been hundreds of simmilar but reversed issues where white kids get off after beating almost killing a black schoolmate,  but should we let it go cause white kids got off? No you prosecute EVERYONE EQUALLY, reguardless of race...

thats what we should be aiming for as a society.... 
we have alot of issues in this world to deal with....  racism is one, but finger pointing has to stop, all of us have issues to deal with, and blacks arej ust as racist today as whites.   To deny that fact is also as ignororant as to say that racism is over cause we have a mixed president.

by Ectheleon on 07/02/2009 04:47:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
in fact, i'm agreeing with your post 100%.

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/02/2009 05:57:36 PM EST

[ Parent ]
and I want to clear something up.  Black americans didn't absolve the Africans of their part in slavery, and in fact their is a huge hatred between Black Americans, and African blacks today.  However, this is not really expressed in front of whites often.  This is a sub-culture of blacks that whites probably never see.  African blacks use the term "nigger", much in the same manner as American whites.  It's like "ashanti" or something like that, but ignorant Black Americans think it's a term of endearment.  The black americans are like a lost people who don't know where they came from, so they have tried to establish their culture here.  I am just trying to clarify that Africans did not get off scott free in the eyes of black americans, as many people might think.  Just to be clear, I think Africa is a fucked up continent with fucked up people, but a lot of it has to do with imperialism ravaging an already warring territory.  It goes way deeper than any race.

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/02/2009 07:41:50 PM EST

[ Parent ]
and I want to clear something up.  Black americans didn't absolve the Africans of their part in slavery, and in fact their is a huge hatred between Black Americans, and African blacks today.  However, this is not really expressed in front of whites often.  This is a sub-culture of blacks that whites probably never see.  African blacks use the term "nigger", much in the same manner as American whites.  It's like "ashanti" or something like that, but ignorant Black Americans think it's a term of endearment.  The black americans are like a lost people who don't know where they came from, so they have tried to establish their culture here.  I am just trying to clarify that Africans did not get off scott free in the eyes of black americans, as many people might think.  Just to be clear, I think Africa is a fucked up continent with fucked up people, but a lot of it has to do with imperialism ravaging an already warring territory.  It goes way deeper than any race.

Chris

by chrisandyasemin on 07/02/2009 07:41:59 PM EST

[ Parent ]

So how can we fix it without discriminating on the basis of race?  That IS our goal, isn't it?  And if that is our goal, shouldn't we actually not discriminate on the basis of race?

If we want a color-blind society, shouldn't we actually be one?  Sure, there will be creeps who pass you on the street and call you "nigger" because they have some kind of mental problem.  But there are many fewer of those kind of people today than there were twenty years ago, and there will be fewer still twenty years from now.

But we're not going to achieve a society that doesn't discriminate on the basis of race by discriminating on the basis of race.

I realize that I may be describing the problem too simplistically.  I realize that we must find ways of countering the discrimination that exists.  I'm just saying that the way to stop discriminating is to stop discriminating in all matters.

by EveningStarNM on 07/02/2009 06:59:12 PM EST

[ Parent ]

...while we're acknowledging the fact that Whites are not the only racists, let's not lose sight of the big picture, which is that its not a simple case, "oh, some Whites are racist, some Blacks are racist, so it's 50/50!".  I don't believe anyone is that dumb, so I do believe people might be hiding a racist agenda when they take that path.  There are racist people in every ethnic group, BUT here in America, it is only Whites who have the social, political and economic power to translate that racism into broad, harmful discrimination.  So the racism of Blacks and the racism of Whites is NOT 50/50, because for the most part, Blacks are not in a position to ACT on that racism in ways that negatively impact Whites financially, professionally or socially.  So racism+ the power to do harm is a much more toxic combination than racism as a member of a group that is a social, political and economic underclass. 

So we have to stay focused on the big picture.  There may be some racist minorities, but Whites, as the majority in America and the politically and economically dominant ethnicity in America, have a power to do broad harm to other ethnic groups with their racism.  No ethnic group's racism call harm Whites collectively.  That's obvious, and to deny that is to align yourself with the KKK and Neo Nazis.

by mdavidboyd on 07/02/2009 05:12:23 PM EST

The big picture IS all forms of racism, not just what you perceive to be an "oppressing" force on a certain race.

"So the racism of Blacks and the racism of Whites is NOT 50/50, because for the most part, Blacks are not in a position to ACT on that racism in ways that negatively impact Whites financially, professionally or socially.  So racism+ the power to do harm is a much more toxic combination than racism as a member of a group that is a social, political and economic underclass."


That's such weak sauce, thats implying (sorry that's flat out saying) that blacks & or other minorities are being harmed or repressed somehow today, that somehow whites are acting from a position of power to do harm because of a racist agenda.

 There may be some racist minorities, but Whites, as the majority in America and the politically and economically dominant ethnicity in America, have a power to do broad harm to other ethnic groups with their racism.  No ethnic group's racism call harm Whites collectively.  That's obvious, and to deny that is to align yourself with the KKK and Neo Nazis.

Straight up, Fuck you, I disagree with you and you say because of that I'm aligned with the KKK or neo Nazis. again because I dont want there to be confusion about this, FUCK YOU ASSHOLE. Racism is destructive in so many ways, the emotional and social deterioration that result from racism is very real and just as important as any political, economical concerns. In fact racism is not only harmful to the race targeted, but to the people consumes by racism. Racism among minorities should NOT be underestimated or dismissed, its counter productive. Its not something that should be tolerated just because "its the whites turn" or because politically or economically aren't being harmed as a whole. Its an absurd standard toward race issues.

by Smokin on 07/02/2009 05:42:35 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I just found out now that there is a black chamber of commerce.... So if you are white and own a biz, you are not recognized by the "Black chamber of Commerce". Maybe I don't know enough about this group to be speaking about it. But just the name alone! Come........On .......Man..... This is why I wrote this blog. There is such a double standard in this country where minorities want their equality and get it and then some. Black Chamber of Commerce........ Give me a freakin break!

by elove20202003 on 07/22/2009 05:23:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Does it hurt you (assumably a white business person)?

Does it help them (the black business person)?

Do they need some help?

Then unless you are afraid they will get "one up" on you, what does it matter?

"No, you are a paid blogger assigned to counter anyone that posts something negative about the government or Obama." by Mcamelyne II on 05/17/2011

by Robrob on 08/02/2009 06:03:06 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Gosh!  I learn something new every day that I come here!

But I wonder why it matters that he was black -- or if he was white, for that matter.  I continually wonder what part of having a color-blind society people don't understand.  Why do they keep wanting to inject a person's skin color into the conversation?

People who like to focus on race, whether they are black or white, are the problem.  The only way we can have a color-blind society is to actually be one.

Now, if you want to talk about culture, that's another thing.  Culture is behavior, not skin color.  I have to yell at my kids all the time (because that's they only way they'll hear me) to turn down that goddam rap pseudo-music so I can hear myself think!

by EveningStarNM on 07/02/2009 06:01:54 PM EST

BigDave: 

Obama is a dictator?  Explain how you define this term.  He defers on virtually every issue to the Congress, and has given very few executive orders in comparison with his predecessor over a given 6-month period.

People are afraid to speak up against the government?  Which people?  The Right does NOTHING but trash Obama and the government as loudly as possible, the Progressive Left is squawking about Obama's performance all over this forum and other Progressive sites, and if you're referring to his mainstream Democratic and Independent supporters, why would they be afraid to speak out?  They aren't afraid of Obama--they LIKE him.  Please give an example of someone who is afraid to voice an opinion about Obama.

The media are socialist?  THIS American media who blatantly kisses up to corporate sponsors?  This media who desperately shills day and night for ratings?  They are socialist?  Please explain.

I will leave the unbelievably patronizing discussion about "slaveowners being thanked and applauded because they had the kindness to employ slave labor" for someone with a bit more outrage on the subject.  But I do find it also patronizing that you would name one historically important Black inventor (Carver) and then, instead of talking about influential authors, politicians, businessmen, scholars, war heroes, etc., you jump right to musicians and athletes who "entertain" for a living.  If you were listing off a group of white Americans who had made positive contributions to our history and our society, how far down the list would you go before you named a single athlete?

You are free to express your opinions here at this forum, even if others don't agree with almost any of them.  But please bring us something stronger than "Obama is a dictator like his buddy Chavez."  We are smart people, and we call it as we see it, including if that means calling out Liberals and corporatist Democrats when warranted.  But we are not suspectible to fact-free partisan hackery from either side.

by Milltycoon on 07/03/2009 12:55:53 AM EST

When there were 4.2 million card-carrying members in the KKK (proud moment for us whities). Lynching was still legal - in other words murdering black people wasn't a crime. Umm, we have come that far in America since then to be ready to abolish Black History Month.

I'm also a fan of Asian Pacific American Month as well.. if only to remember and recognize the contributions that Asian-Americans have made to our society as well as remember some of the horrible things that have happened to our Asian-American countrymen (anyone remember the Internment Camps)?

Let's let everyone have their damn month.  And guess what, every month is white American history month already! Geez, get over it elove.

If you're that upset over Jamie Fox just remember that assholes come in all colors and move on with your life. He's an asshole, he's black, so what? 

by ilovecenk99 on 08/02/2009 06:32:35 PM EST

 Display: