03/14/2010 10:47:14 AM EST
Separation of Money and State
posted by coach1640280
The constitution of the United States was written to form a practical and functioning government. The constitution did this by limiting government.
Our present government and our two main political parties are profoundly warped and shaped by special interest money. We need a constitutional amendment to separate money and state.
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:DoNotOptimizeForBrowser> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->
Legal economic entities, corporations, partnerships, unions, and businesses, like religious institutions, must be constitutionally separated from government.
Religious institutions cannot contribute to public political campaigns. Why should other legal institutions be allowed? Contributions to a government, "of the people, by the people, and for the people", should be made exclusively "by the people". Government political campaigns must rely exclusively on personal income contributions, limited by congress.
If we wish to spend "political capital" on constitutional amendments, lets spend it wisely. We needn't look beyond our pocketbook to see a gaping money-politics fault-line.
Here’s how an amendment to the constitution, separating money from state, might read:
The rights of the people, extended in this constitution shall not be construed or implied to extend to legal military, economic, social, or political entities. Contributions to government campaign financing “of the people, by the people, and for the People” shall be made exclusively by the people, and limited by congress.