03/02/2010 03:26:35 AM EST
Rats as pets
posted by ksoviero
I have been wanting to write this for a while now, but after seeing Monday's (3-1-10) show, I felt that I had waited long enough. Rats have been dogged on for far too long for atrocities that they themselves have not committed, not to mention all the negative stereotypes.
Cenk. Don't try to deface the small sliver of positive attention rats barely have at their disposal today. Rats have been kept as pets for centuries, they are intelligent, resourceful (as I suspect most people know), and posses many attributes that usually only apply to dogs, cats, and other familiar pets.
First of all, rats were NOT the cause of the Bubonic Plague. Their only action pertaining to those unfortunate years, were the fact that they were intelligent and could find their way onto ships and into houses easily. This caused the fleas that lived on them (the fleas being the things that actually carried the plague) to be able to infect the sailors and individuals living there. While they did also catch the plague, when they did, they died. They were as devastated by the plague as humans.
Second of all - back in modern times - “[rats] pose no more of a health risk than other common pets” (http://www.merckvetmanual.c
om/mvm/index.jsp?cfile=htm/
bc/220100.htm).
Not to mention that “fancy” rats (the kind kept as pets) are as similar in behavior and health, as wolves are to German Shepherds.
Thank you for talking the time to have read this far.
I really do enjoy watching The Young Turks on a daily basis (in fact I am a member), but sometimes I need to make sure that I at least try to set the record straight. I don't think this small note contains enough information to really get across the truth, but I hope it will at least get people to not dismiss rats (be them “fancy” or wild) so easily.